The poor are paying the price for Obama’s restrictions on religious groups
In a variety of international settings, I have seen religious groups, with support from the U.S. government, engaged in AIDS treatment, fistula repair, malaria control, and the promotion of child and maternal health. Ram Cnaan of the University of Pennsylvania has documented the domestic role of “sacred places that serve civic purposes” — homeless shelters, food banks, health care, welfare-to-work, prisoner re-entry programs. Cnaan estimates the “replacement value” — the cost to government agencies of assuming these roles — to be about $140,000 each year for the typical community-serving religious institution…
Much of this good work — and similar work across the country — is now threatened. If federal policies make it impossible for religious nonprofits and hospitals to work in conjunction with federal, state and local agencies in providing social services, millions of poor and vulnerable Americans — Catholic and non-Catholic, religious and nonreligious — would suffer. The task of building alternatives would cost hundreds of billions of dollars — and then lack the distinctive human touch provided by religious groups.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Well, once all assistance comes from one source (like the single payor healthcare system, this is the ultimate objective for the statists), then everything will be perfect!
cynccook on February 7, 2012 at 5:24 PM
Obama wants the federal Government to be completely responsible for the poor. He doesn’t want the competition of religious groups.
portlandon on February 7, 2012 at 5:26 PM
“He would rather the poor be poorer provided the rich were less rich.”
-Thatcher
joekenha on February 7, 2012 at 5:33 PM
The left wants the state to supercede religion.
darwin on February 7, 2012 at 5:43 PM
I think Obama finally found a group of people who will just say “NO” for the first time in his life. Same for the Democrat party, and all politicians.
They claim to be “pro-choice” and in this instance the choice is NO. We all know how they will react.
Mord on February 7, 2012 at 5:45 PM
FIFY
ConservativePartyNow on February 7, 2012 at 5:59 PM
Everything PantLoad is doing is designed to get as many people as possible on government tit….
Took over student loans
Looking to do away with charitable contributions tax deduction
Heath care
Fannie/Freddie
BigWyo on February 7, 2012 at 6:17 PM
As designed. Obama and the Democrats want Americans dependant only on the Democrat and will demand votes in exchange.
RJL on February 7, 2012 at 6:26 PM
Who care about the poor? There are women’s votes to buy, and wealthy feminists whose campaign contributions are needed.
rockmom on February 7, 2012 at 7:13 PM