Scott Walker is the real progressive in Wisconsin
Progressives believe, correctly, that government can and should provide such public goods and services as education, parks, or aid for the poor and disabled. It’s axiomatic that the public is entitled to the highest quality at the best possible price. Yet unions, by their nature, increase the price of public services, without necessarily increasing quality. Just ask New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg about the “rubber room” where, until a couple of years ago, hundreds of union teachers languished, on full pay, while awaiting disciplinary hearings.
Which brings us to equality. To be sure, public-sector pay and perks hardly put union workers in the 1 percent. But their clout enables them to enjoy retirement and health-care benefits that are often better than those available to the middle-class citizens whose tax dollars support them. What’s fair about that? Even after Walker’s bill, Wisconsin public employees pay just 5.8 percent of their salary toward their pensions and a modest 12.6 percent of their health-care premiums…
Maybe there are enough voters in Wisconsin who support actual progressive governance — as opposed to “progressive” interest groups — to retain Walker.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
I agree with what the author said of Walker’s accomplishments, but since when do “progressives” believe in smaller government, balanced budgets and transparency? Sounds like he’s spinning this as a progressive victory.
To quote my supervising teacher last spring, “I’m sorry, but I should not have to pay for my own health care. Make some rich guy pay for it.”
Logboy on February 7, 2012 at 10:14 PM
I think Charles Lane doesn’t want to come off as the pro conservative at WaPo. I don’t get the, Walker is progressive, twist to his piece.
d1carter on February 7, 2012 at 10:23 PM
He’s making the same point Mickey Kaus has been making for a long time about the Democrats… and I bet that’s his inspiration.
ninjapirate on February 7, 2012 at 10:32 PM
It sounds like he’s trying to spin this as a “progressive” victory. Not even close. “Progressive” in Wisconsin means going back to the tax and spend, anti-gun, pro-choice, pro-union days of Jim Doyle.
Logboy on February 7, 2012 at 10:32 PM
Thanks for the heads up. I did a quick search. I had no idea Kaus, or any other individual for that matter, could hold such views and not be beheaded by angry liberals.
Logboy on February 7, 2012 at 10:36 PM
Then his opponents lie.
ChrisL on February 7, 2012 at 10:56 PM
Walker is liberal in The Founders sense of the term waaaay before the Democrats corrupted the word’s meaning. Liberal (small l) connotes freedom from oppressive government but nowadays Liberal (capital l) pretty much means Communist.
viking01 on February 7, 2012 at 11:48 PM
Comming next from the Washington 0bama Post:
0bama is the Real Conservative in the race for POTUS
DannoJyd on February 8, 2012 at 2:37 AM