Planned Parenthood’s hostages
While Planned Parenthood’s target in the Komen case was new, its tactics are not. In the past two years, we have seen the abortion giant (and the politicians it funds) hold for ransom a diverse array of hostages.
In 2010, President Obama and the Democrats in Congress risked and narrowly averted the rejection of their signature health-care law in order to block the inclusion of provisions (such as the 1970s Hyde Amendment) that prevent federal abortion funding. At the 11th hour, a handful of “pro-life” Democrats capitulated, giving Mr. Obama and Planned Parenthood their victory.
Last year, in April, Mr. Obama risked a government shutdown over language in a resolution that would have defunded Planned Parenthood at the federal level. At the last moment, congressional Republicans gave way and allowed the federal money to keep flowing.
Also in 2011, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services threatened to withhold billions of dollars in Medicaid funds from those states such as Indiana that prohibit state funding of Planned Parenthood and other entities that provide elective abortions. Planned Parenthood strongly opposed Indiana’s attempt to cut off its funding and celebrated the federal government’s intervention. Indiana is currently litigating the matter in federal court.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
WARNING:
Outrageous outrage incoming.
Pablo Honey on February 7, 2012 at 6:40 PM
I’m surprised he left out the illuminati, black helicopters, FEMA death camps, Kenyan takeover of the US, water fluoridation, moon landing and most importantly and undeniably, the lizard people.
lester on February 7, 2012 at 7:05 PM
I had a thought.
If pro-abortion activists can label those who’re against abortion as “anti-choice,” can pro-life activists label them as “anti-life?”
ZK on February 7, 2012 at 7:07 PM
‘Murderers’ would be more to the point.
slickwillie2001 on February 7, 2012 at 7:26 PM
That’s why they’re called “pro choice” to begin with. When the battle was first being joined, anti-abortion groups figured out it’s better to be for (“pro”) something rather than against (“anti”). Semantics are better. And “Pro Life” was born. Next the pro abortion crowd figured out “pro abortion” was a loser. And nobody in their right mind would say they are “anti life.” So now we have the wildly misleading “pro choice” crowd.
Mitoch55 on February 7, 2012 at 7:28 PM
“Pro-fetus” would be more appropriate.
Pablo Honey on February 7, 2012 at 8:29 PM