Our Super PAC decision: We’re not going to play by two sets of rules, Republicans
The President opposed the Citizens United decision. He understood that with the dramatic growth in opportunities to raise and spend unlimited special-interest money, we would see new strategies to hide it from public view. He continues to support a law to force full disclosure of all funding intended to influence our elections, a reform that was blocked in 2010 by a unanimous Republican filibuster in the U.S. Senate. And the President favors action — by constitutional amendment, if necessary — to place reasonable limits on all such spending.
But this cycle, our campaign has to face the reality of the law as it currently stands…
Therefore, the campaign has decided to do what we can, consistent with the law, to support Priorities USA in its effort to counter the weight of the GOP Super PAC. We will do so only in the knowledge and with the expectation that all of its donations will be fully disclosed as required by law to the Federal Election Commission.
What this change means practically: Senior campaign officials as well as some White House and Cabinet officials will attend and speak at Priorities USA fundraising events. While campaign officials may be appearing at events to amplify our message, these folks won’t be soliciting contributions for Priorities USA. I should also note that the President, Vice President and First Lady will not be a part of this effort; their political activity will remain focused on the President’s campaign.
But here’s what this doesn’t change: the fact that ordinary people stepping up to take control of the political process is essential to our strategy.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2
I was raised in Maryland. It’s technically the South — our state song is about evil Yankees invading Baltimore on the eve of the Civil War, and it’s below the Mason-Dixon Line — but culturally, not so much. Just another deracinated suburban kid with no claims of being “southern” but with time spent and family ties there.
North Alabama (Rocket City). Grandpa was actually a hillbilly from Tennessee (his words) while grandma was a townie and allegedly a little “stuck up.”
urban elitist on February 7, 2012 at 2:05 PM
Huntsville’s a pretty good mix of rural and big city. I grew up a couple of hours west of there.
rogerb on February 7, 2012 at 4:29 PM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2