Maybe Putin will be a reformer this time around
But what will Putin do next? Will he really fulfill his promise to let new parties emerge or just wait out his opposition, which is divided and still lacks a real national leader? Putin’s Russia is at a crossroads. It has become a “sort-of-but-not-really-country.” Russia today is sort of a democracy, but not really. It’s sort of a free market, but not really. It’s sort of got the rule of law to protect businesses, but not really. It’s sort of a European country, but not really. It has sort of a free press, but not really. Its cold war with America is sort of over, but not really. It’s sort of trying to become something more than a petro-state, but not really…
This is either delusional or really cynical. And then there’s foreign policy. Putin was very helpful at the United Nations in not blocking the no-fly zone over Libya, but he feels burned by it — that we went from protecting civilians to toppling his ally and arms customer, Muammar el-Qaddafi. It’s true. But what an ally! What a thing to regret! And, now, the more Putin throws his support behind the murderous dictatorship of Bashar al-Assad in Syria, the more he looks like a person buying a round-trip ticket on the Titanic — after it has already hit the iceberg. Assad is a dead man walking. Even if all you care about are arms sales, wouldn’t Russia want to align itself with the emerging forces in Syria?
“There is a strong domestic dimension to Russian policy toward Syria,” said Vladimir Frolov, a Russian foreign policy expert. “If we allow the U.N. and the U.S. to put pressure on a regime — that is somewhat like ours — to cede power to the opposition, what kind of precedent could that create?”









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
No, seriously Chuck, I promise I’ll hold the football this time. Go ahead and kick it.
-Lucy
Flange on February 5, 2012 at 7:43 PM
He couldn’t even reform the election he stole….
The Nerve on February 5, 2012 at 7:43 PM
Yah… he can run on Hope & Change.
heh.
katy on February 5, 2012 at 7:45 PM
Oh He will be a reformer. If in reformer, you mean reforming the USSR.
astonerii on February 5, 2012 at 7:49 PM
LOL… the nyt is so far from reality.
Wade on February 5, 2012 at 7:53 PM
Reformer just like Assad.
Grunt on February 5, 2012 at 7:53 PM
I’d say this is about as bad as the NYT can get with their professional, deliberate dissemination of naivete without hopefully touting Ahmadinejad, but I’m fairly sure they’ve done that too.
HitNRun on February 5, 2012 at 7:59 PM
former kgb guy reformer? only walter duranty’s peeps could do that.
newrouter on February 5, 2012 at 8:00 PM
Contrast, if you have the time, this awful analysis by Friedman with Walter Russell Mead’s analysis of why Putin supports Assad: Russian’s Syrian Bet.
Shorter Mead: Putin’s playing to his ultranationalist base, he won’t get anything by going along with the West, his veto gives support to the anti-American resistance around the world, and, anyway, the Arabs will forget his support for Assad in a week.
It’s like reading a high school term paper versus a doctoral thesis.
SteveMG on February 5, 2012 at 8:02 PM
Like Bush and Obama were reformers.
rickv404 on February 5, 2012 at 8:18 PM
Of course he will! He shall re-form the Russian empire!
OldEnglish on February 5, 2012 at 9:04 PM
Bernie Madoff will do a good job of investing my life savings this time around. I’m sure of it.
John Hitchcock on February 5, 2012 at 9:34 PM
Killing a zombie Usama is a great premise for a movie, but judging from this trailer, and the history of movies of the last few years, I don’t think it will be enough to get me to pay to sit through 90 minutes of bad acting, cliched writing, and overused CGI like the many other awful B movies that have been produced.
There was a time when a good number of B movies were actually watchable without falling asleep.
V-rod on February 5, 2012 at 9:41 PM
During the Forties and Fifties I went to the movies to see the B movie, regardless of what the A movie was.
OldEnglish on February 5, 2012 at 10:02 PM
…and maybe Obama will govern from the center and tackle entitlements and debt if he/em> gets re-elected…
DavidW on February 5, 2012 at 10:15 PM
formatting fail:
…and maybe Obama will govern from the center and tackle entitlements and debt if he gets re-elected…
DavidW on February 5, 2012 at 10:16 PM
Well, he will be the one guy that can stop a war. As Iran and Syria are now part of the Russian Soviet states but just don’t know it yet. When Iran does get the bomb and uses it Russia will not be to happy. As long as the checks keep coming to the Kremlin from Iran for Nuke tech and the oil keeps flowing they can boast all they want but that is about it. Trust Putin to keep Iran in Check but that is about it.
tjexcite on February 6, 2012 at 12:22 AM
Oh, this is fun! Let’s try some other ones.
Maybe Barack Obama will be a centrist instead of a Marxist this time!
Maybe Romney will be a conservative this time around!
If it wasn’t so late, I could play this game for hours.
didymus on February 6, 2012 at 1:05 AM