Why, these Wall Street protesters are the new populists
But perhaps the closest historical parallel is with the Populist movement of the 1890s, which, like Occupy Wall Street, was a broad, economics-driven revolt that targeted a predatory class of corporate capitalists — the robber barons of the Gilded Age.
The Populists drove the Progressive era of reform of the early 1900s. They sought to dismantle the centralized power of corporations in the economy and return economic liberty to individuals and small business. They envisioned a graduated income tax, the secret ballot, the regulation of banks. It remains to be seen if today’s 99 Percenters will be as successful at transforming the political discourse.
The Populists formed a political party with a specific platform — the People’s Party. They ran candidates who won office; they formed real-world banking and agricultural cooperatives to challenge the hegemony of corporate capitalism.
In Liberty Square, the protesters say that they have no intention of disbanding; that they’re preparing for a long, cold winter. But will their numbers increase, or will their resolve fizzle in the histrionics of street theater? Will they organize or merely proselytize? Most important, can they move enough of today’s silent majority — 99 Percenters all — off the sidelines and into the fray?









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
There’s no such thing as a new populist, you moron.
Dusty on October 6, 2011 at 9:24 PM
The vast majority of Americans have nothing in common with those dirty hippies.
Blake on October 6, 2011 at 9:24 PM
Just a buncha Trustafarians.
Old hipsters and young dipsters.
The doucheoise.
ajacksonian on October 6, 2011 at 9:25 PM
Trustafarians and Bolsheviks… but the MSM loves them ’cause they’re not the Tea Party.
Fallon on October 6, 2011 at 9:30 PM
LOL I’m with Klein. These people are seriously overestimating.
blatantblue on October 6, 2011 at 9:30 PM
They liked secret ballots back in the 19th century, huh? My how times have changed for the populists.
Here is your populist, right here, the guy who is going to make every American’s daily existence better:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l3Y9CARUwio&feature=player_embedded
I wouldn’t let that jackwad enter my yard much less work for me.
Bishop on October 6, 2011 at 9:31 PM
The hypocrisy of these media jack-holes. I just want to gouge my eyes out. Pelosi says “God Bless them,” they’re an inspiring and uplifting populist movement to the MSM ????!!!!!!!!??????
Meanwhile, tea partiers were terrorists, idiots, selfish, loathsome, Nazis, astroturf, racist, rethuglikkkans funded by the Koch brothers and Fox News.
{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{SCREAM}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}
Firefly_76 on October 6, 2011 at 9:31 PM
Maybe the naive nudniks protesting on Wall Street need to have their eyes opened to facts about their fearless leader, he of street agitation.
Obama was put into office by Goldman Sachs.
Top Contributors to Obama 2008
University of California $1,648,685
Goldman Sachs $1,013,091
Harvard University $864,654
Microsoft Corp $852,167
Google Inc $814,540
JPMorgan Chase & Co $808,799
Citigroup Inc $736,771
Time Warner $624,618
Sidley Austin LLP $600,298
Stanford University $595,716
National Amusements Inc $563,798
Wilmerhale Llp $550,168
Skadden, Arps et al $543,539
Columbia University $541,002
UBS AG $532,674
IBM Corp $532,372
General Electric $529,855
US Government $517,908
Morgan Stanley $512,232
Latham & Watkins $503,295
http://www.opensecrets.org/pres08/contrib.php?cid=N00009638
onlineanalyst on October 6, 2011 at 9:33 PM
And for the dipsticks complaining about their college loans and blaming the BANKS, just who is it that is ASKING for the money?
Oh, yeah, the COLLEGES.
How about BLAMING THEM for asking so much? And asking for your money back as you didn’t learn a damn thing there other than how to whine, moan and complain about how ‘hard you have it’. The banks are pushing you asshats to take out a loan the SCHOOLS ARE.
ajacksonian on October 6, 2011 at 9:35 PM
The left is still all about hopey changey…if they write it they think it is true.
d1carter on October 6, 2011 at 9:45 PM
Don’t know if it’s been said yet, but I’m stealing that immediately!
Gang-of-One on October 6, 2011 at 9:50 PM
Never say they don’t teach them anything in J-school. That’s some Major League euphemism right there.
HitNRun on October 6, 2011 at 10:01 PM
Two movements: We want the Government to give us more of others people’s stuff .vs. We want government to take less of our stuff.
One actually populist; the other, not so much.
One popular with THIS Government; the other, not so much.
One popular with the media; the other, not so much.
One has and will continue to drive this country because at it’s core it – and they – WORK; the other(s), not so much.
Me? I’ll come home after a hard day’s work and… have more tea.
Unquiet on October 6, 2011 at 10:06 PM
Of course they’re the new populists. Populism is despicable. Populism is the for the little guy and against the big guy, and doesn’t care who’s right and wrong. If you’re poor, the populists are for you even if you’re a criminal. If you’re rich, they want to tear you down, even if you’re a productive citizen. BTW, the populists of the early 20th century were horrendous racists and nativists, something the LA Times will forget to mention.
Bartrams Garden on October 6, 2011 at 10:24 PM
Marxism is NOT populism!
Never forget: Labor Union + Government = Marxism
Freddy on October 6, 2011 at 10:27 PM
LOL. Yea it’s called the Democrat party of 2011.
angryed on October 6, 2011 at 11:04 PM
If I hear ‘corporate greed’ or ‘profit motive’ one more time I’ll puke.
They all sound like my brother. Sigh.
MaggiePoo on October 7, 2011 at 1:23 AM
Once the snow comes they’ll be back in their folk’s basement.
BHO Jonestown on October 7, 2011 at 2:43 AM
Ann Coulter: I am not the first to note the vast differences between the Wall Street protesters and the tea partiers. To name three: The tea partiers have jobs, showers and a point.
petefrt on October 7, 2011 at 6:37 AM
That’s my bet too. It’s almost a sure thing.
But for its promoters (Soros, unions, Van Jones et al.) this is a dry run for next summer, a dress rehearsal to build the infrastructure and de-bug the machinery. Next year, when the warm weather returns the protests will resume in a more virulent and confrontational form.
petefrt on October 7, 2011 at 6:43 AM
The French Revo*lut*ion was also a populist, economics driven movement.
tommyboy on October 7, 2011 at 6:55 AM