Maybe a downgrade wouldn’t be so bad after all
A downgrade to the nation’s credit would probably increase the cost of borrowing for the federal government and for everyone else. But the Obama administration, House Republicans, some economists and Wall Street strategists have concluded that the economic impact would be surprisingly modest, one reason that negotiations over a “grand bargain” for debt reduction broke down…
“A downgrade has lots of downsides, but they’re minor in comparison to not raising the debt ceiling on time, so I think the focus is correct at this point,” said Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody’s Analytics, a sister company to the rating agency that rates debt securities…
“The fundamental strength of the U.S. economy and widespread perception of the U.S. sovereign as a high-quality credit is likely to persist for the foreseeable future, even in a moderate downgrade scenario,” Fitch said in a note in July on the consequences of a downgrade.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Downgrade.
Now.
artist on July 30, 2011 at 8:36 PM
Too big to fail.
DrSteve on July 30, 2011 at 8:39 PM
I bet the Grey Lady has to say that all the time. Isn’t NYT debt junk?
andy85719 on July 30, 2011 at 8:40 PM
Do they need to switch to this argument now that they’re realizing that our debt really is too big?
Because when they thought that the downgrade was merely contingent on a debt ceiling raise they thought that it was “so bad”.
blink on July 30, 2011 at 8:50 PM
Sniper fire for their boy.
SouthernGent on July 30, 2011 at 8:56 PM
They’re backtracking just like S&P did — notice any parallels here?
No cheerleading? No vested interest?
OnlyOrange on July 30, 2011 at 8:57 PM
Uh, no. Rest assured if negotiations have broken down, it’s because someone has decided the political impact would surprisingly modest, at least as it relates to them.
This is possibly the most untrue statement of this entire campaign. What is the point, from a conservative or independent’s perspective – leaving aside the blowback of missed Social Security checks – of raising the debt ceiling, if not to protect the United States borrowing rate?
HitNRun on July 30, 2011 at 9:07 PM
We will default. We will go bankrupt. Not an if but a when.
angryed on July 30, 2011 at 9:09 PM