The way Obama’s going, “Carter II” is a best-case scenario
The Great Recession is not as crushing as the Great Depression, but President Obama’s problems in the face of economic turmoil are beginning to look Hooveresque. The stimulus program on which he hung his hat may, as its friends argue, have prevented an even worse economic debacle. Clearly, however, the $800 billion plus stimulus failed to jump-start an economic recovery. Many of the administration’s pet stimulus programs have joined Jerry Ford’s “Whip Inflation Now” buttons on the junkpile of history: green jobs, cash for clunkers, debt relief for homeowners, and now, by the President’s own admission, ‘shovel-ready’ infrastructure projects.
Like Hoover, President Obama now finds himself (at least temporarily) without the ability to shape national economic policy. His opponents in Congress will block the kind of second stimulus his instincts and allies propose, and the Fed is not at this point particularly impressed by the White House’s recovery plan and is acting on its own. Like Hoover, President Obama faces the possibility of a devastating second downturn due to economic problems in Europe — and like President Hoover, President Obama can’t do much to prevent it. Like Hoover, President Obama is harried by a domestic populist revolt against his leadership and the policies he supports and like Hoover, President Obama’s once unassailable popularity is being slowly ground down by economic bad news.
As President Obama struggles, again, to gain control of the economic conversation and relaunch his administration’s economic policy (how many times has this administration announced its determination to focus on job creation?) the similarities between these two idealistic and patriotic men begin to emerge. In both cases we have a President who thought that his mission was to remake the world, but who gradually discovered that the tools in his toolkit were no match for the problems he faced. With great intelligence and serious goodwill, both men set about to address the most important issues facing the country and the world — only to find that their chosen remedies failed one by one.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Heck of a job Barry!
jnelchef on June 15, 2011 at 10:13 PM
B+.
conservative pilgrim on June 15, 2011 at 10:17 PM
Just think about it, in 30 years, when Obama is old, grey, and delusional, we’ll still be entertained by him talking about how awesome his presidency was.
Just like Carter.
uknowmorethanme on June 15, 2011 at 10:17 PM
Barry is patriotic?
flyfisher on June 15, 2011 at 10:22 PM
I beg to differ to apply those words to BHO. I don’t think he’s that smart, and I don’t think for a minute that he has or had serious goodwill toward this country.
INC on June 15, 2011 at 10:23 PM
He already has the gray and delusional part covered, we’re just waiting on Father Time.
Bishop on June 15, 2011 at 10:24 PM
I’m keeping my fingers crossed for a Spiro Agnew.
Blake on June 15, 2011 at 10:31 PM
I have no idea why Walter Russell Mead, Victor Davis Hanson and the late Sam Huntington are Democrats; they do the biggest takedowns of liberal ideas.
IR-MN on June 15, 2011 at 10:35 PM
VDH is a Democrat?
Whaaaaa???
roscopico on June 15, 2011 at 10:44 PM
roscopico on June 15, 2011 at 10:44 PM
Weird, huh. Dr. Mead has been slamming liberals on his blog for weeks now and has in general been pretty conservative, except in 08. I don’t get them either.
IR-MN on June 15, 2011 at 10:57 PM
To be fair, I think he’s more evil than delusional at this point in time.
uknowmorethanme on June 15, 2011 at 11:00 PM
Carter II my butt.
Obama is going to create an entire new category of FAIL.
BigWyo on June 15, 2011 at 11:12 PM
Mead is some goooood readin’. Especially recently. There I was, swearing I’d get to bed on time last night. Did one more check, and BOOM–this article. With Mead’s byline. Must read.
I blame Walter Russell Mead for my insomnia…that’s the ticket…
Sekhmet on June 15, 2011 at 11:17 PM
In many ways, Obama’s acting out a re-make of the “Picture of Dorien Gray”.
The end will not be pretty.
landlines on June 15, 2011 at 11:31 PM
What an article. Poor Obama, the stars just haven’t aligned for this supremely intelligent, highly patriotic man. /s
It can’t be that Hoover’s policies — socialist, micromanaging, protectionist policies that were in the main adopted by FDR, which were in the main adopted by FDR, helped bring about and extend the Great Depression, and that Obama’s similar policies aren’t worsening an already rotten situation caused mainly by corrupt socialist policies in his own party — and assisted by some of his own partisan votes.
This is the typical MSM meme. Even as virtually all of his domestic policies have proven to be hideously expensive failures and unsurpassed payoffs, they still make excuses for the “well-meaning” Great One. Fortunately, in this less than year-and-a-half before the election, there will be opportunities to tour the country and address the propaganda.
Aardvark on June 15, 2011 at 11:48 PM
That’s Meade’s point in a nutshell, yes. Or as he put it:
Obama’s main problem right now, is that he doesn’t know what he doesn’t know. It’s why he keeps treading the same broken ground time and time again, and why “Unexpectedly!” is swiftly becoming the punchline of the decade. He thinks he’s got all the knowledge he needs to orchestrate (to command? Hey, he did appoint the “Special Master for Pay,” remember) an economy that produces goods and services for 25% of the globe, using just 5% of the global population. The word for this is “Hubris.” And with Hubris moving in to stay, can Nemesis (the failing, flailing economy) be anywhere but right behind?
Blacksmith on June 16, 2011 at 12:00 AM
The problem with this argument is that the economy has a rational level of prosperity at any given time. The act of stopping it from reaching that level quickly only causes it to continue to degrade slowly until it eventually reaches that level, and only when it has reached the bottom can it begin the task of growing and prospering. Yes, the intervention can change the rational level to some degree.
astonerii on June 16, 2011 at 12:58 AM
Carter is an arrogant, meddling fool but Zero is an arrogant, meddling fool with a sense of entitlement seeking vengeance and destruction against our nation.
viking01 on June 16, 2011 at 1:30 AM
:lol I thing a ton of Conservatives have seen this coming since 2008.
dec5 on June 16, 2011 at 1:46 AM
:lol I think a ton of Conservatives have seen this coming since 2008.
dec5 on June 16, 2011 at 1:46 AM
I must disagree with WRM at this point: I don’t think Obama’s instincts are toward a second stimulus. His instincts seem to be geared toward looking good for the camera, clipping his enunciatiion while baratoning his voice, and selecting the proper iron for a given distance. His advisors — where ever the hell they ran off to — seemed to be the ones with the stimulus fetish.
apostic on June 16, 2011 at 2:17 AM
Victor Davis Hanson is not a democrat.
…
blatantblue on June 16, 2011 at 4:33 AM
Obama combines the worst traits of Jimmy Carter, LBJ and Benito Mussolini.
HalJordan on June 16, 2011 at 4:50 AM
Obama, a great American patriot?
They guy who sought out anti-American radicals to be his friends at college? The guy who recruited anti-American, American flag-stomping, domestic terrorist Billy Ayers to help launch his political career in Chicago, and even allowed Ayers to babysit his kids? The guy who wrote a book praising the Kenyan Communist father who abandoned him in infancy, not the American mother and her parents who raised and supported him? The guy who sat for more than 20 years in the pulpit of a racist loon whose sermons routinely included such phrases as “God Damn Amerikkka”?
The guy who, to announce he was running for U.S. president, held a rally in Germany, where he pronounced himself not an American patriot, but a “citizen of the world”? The guy who, during the presidential debates, said that he did not believe in the concept of American exceptionalism? The guy who loves the book The Post-American World, and made it author one of his presidential advisors? The guy who, for years, refused to wear a U.S. flag pin or to place his hand over his heart when the national anthem played, because he was uncomfortable with such displays of nationalistic feelings? The guy who cheered the Mexican president when that president verbally (and through lawsuits) attacked the state of Arizona for attempting to defend its borders and enforce U.S. immigration laws against the hundreds of thousands of illegal aliens who swarm across Mexico’s border and into Arizona every year?
That’s your idea of an American patriot, Mead?
Really?
AZCoyote on June 16, 2011 at 8:47 AM
I’m old enough to remember the Carter years.
And – I can’t believe I’m saying this – Carter was an outstanding President when compared to Obumbler.
Yes. Obama is actually that bad.
Professor Blather on June 16, 2011 at 8:51 AM
But…
Thank God they want to block his programs… they didn’t work… what was that about not learning any lessons?
mankai on June 16, 2011 at 9:18 AM
…and it’s a massive lie that the Stimulus prevented a greater recession. The economy had made its great stumble and was settling into its cleanout mode when the Obama administration started to mess with it in Spring 2009.
mankai on June 16, 2011 at 9:23 AM