A Libyan no-fly zone is worth the risks
If the United States is to bomb Libya, the argument must be made now, both at home and to the international community, before Qaddafi can slaughter his way to victory over the rebel movement. Such a public debate might alone deter Qaddafi from further bloodshed. But if the U.S. is to stay home, the president should explain why he is willing to accept bloodshed that does not intersect with U.S. interests. That might clearly signal to protestors that they should not count on U.S. assistance, and possibly prevent the same massacre that befell the Iraqi Kurds following the Gulf War.
If the U.S. intervenes in the ongoing revolution in the Arab world, some will call these spontaneous and moving uprisings the work of the CIA. But such malcontents will say that no matter what. In the mean time, if the Obama administration is so committed, the people of Libya need to know that on the other side of their struggle is U.S. solidarity. And as “Colonel” Qaddafi’s henchmen turn Tripoli into a killing field, it’s a safe bet that at least a few protesters wish the U.S. Air Force was there to fire back.










Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
We’ll be blamed for slaughtering HIS troops if we do … and blamed for not STOPPING the slaughter of the rebels if we don’t … so pick one. I prefer to be blamed for killing bad guys than for letting bad guys kill.
Tony737 on March 9, 2011 at 6:07 PM
Niiiice. You found a counterpoint to the George Will article! You are worth your weight in gold, Allahpundit!
cynccook on March 9, 2011 at 6:12 PM
Well, who ya gonna listen to? A WAR HERO? Or some general?
Tony737 on March 9, 2011 at 6:17 PM
What war hero? There’s no war hero mentioned in your quote. Just a medal hunting traitor and a general.
single stack on March 9, 2011 at 6:26 PM
whew!…sure glad there’s wide-spread consensus on this issue…
Knott Buyinit on March 9, 2011 at 6:34 PM
I bet its nice for other countries to do your dirty work.
“Oh please help these poor oppressed people.” Does anyone know anything about these freedom fighters? Or does the hatred for quadaffy make that unnecessary. If its to stop the killing why didnt you guys insist we go to Darfur? Lots of slaughtering there.
No blood for oil /s (kind of)
Greed on March 9, 2011 at 6:47 PM
What war hero? There’s no war hero mentioned in your quote. Just a medal hunting traitor and a general. – Single Stack
Hahaha I know, I was being sarcastic.
Tony737 on March 9, 2011 at 6:53 PM
If its to stop the killing why didnt you guys insist we go to Darfur? – Greed
Some of us DID. I wanted to see the USAF bomb the crap outta the Janjaweed! I know, I know, “WARMONGER!”
Tony737 on March 9, 2011 at 6:55 PM
Your just mean (kidding). Im all for blowing up some POS’s, i just would like to know who we are helping, and do they deserve our help. Are we helping some particular sect who in two years are going to export terrorism to the US?
Greed on March 9, 2011 at 7:14 PM
No. No American lives for Libya.
Qadahfi is a nutcake for sure, but al-Qaeda always as had long ties with Libya’s Islamists, and Libya’s Islamic Fighting Group was one of its first allies. A Libyan named Abu Yaha al-Libi is now considered a possible successor to Osama bin Laden.
Obungler and NATO will inflame the Muslim world as neo-colonialists in an imperial adventure to grab Libya’s oil. Might just rally Libyans and other North Africans in a nationalist manner, and present a propaganda coup to the Islamists.
Urban Infidel on March 9, 2011 at 7:23 PM
What to do when two groups of Muslims go to war with each other?
Really?
REALLY?
Do we really need to ask that question?
elfman on March 9, 2011 at 7:40 PM
It doesn’t make one damn bit of sense for the U.S. to get involved in Libya at all. It’s lose/lose no matter who takes over in the end of all this.
Libya is of no use to us in any fashion.
uknowmorethanme on March 9, 2011 at 7:51 PM
Arm both sides with a dozen nukes a piece and accidentally detonate them?
MadDogF on March 9, 2011 at 8:45 PM
Question: Should the U.S. go to war with Libya?
Answer: We’re broke. Next question.
Bugler on March 9, 2011 at 8:55 PM