Great news: GOP figuring out creative new ways to earmark
Though Mr. Kirk and other Republicans thundered against pork-barrel spending and lawmakers’ practice of designating money for special projects through earmarks, they have not shied from using a less-well-known process called lettermarking to try to direct money to projects in their home districts…
Lettermarking, which takes place outside the Congressional appropriations process, is one of the many ways that legislators who support a ban on earmarks try to direct money back home.
In phonemarking, a lawmaker calls an agency to request financing for a project. More indirectly, members of Congress make use of what are known as soft earmarks, which involve making suggestions about where money should be directed, instead of explicitly instructing agencies to finance a project. Members also push for increases in financing of certain accounts in a federal agency’s budget and then forcefully request that the agency spend the money on the members’ pet project.
Because all these methods sidestep the regular legislative process, the number of times they are used and the money involved are even harder to track than with regular earmarks.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Folks, this article is about phonemarking (sort of like earmarking). It mentions one (read it again: ONE) Republican (Kirk of ILL, notorious known RINO).
Sigh. Apparently Allahpundit is bored .. again.
moochy on December 28, 2010 at 12:41 PM
For crying out loud! These crooks spend 24/7 trying to find ways to scr*w voters and taxpayers. Gads, I detest these below slug slimes in dc!
L
letget on December 28, 2010 at 12:41 PM
GOP congressman “Hey US Army Corps of Engineers, I think you should dredge the river in my district like the money you receive directs you to do”
NYT “GOP comes up with new earmarks and boondoggles”
LincolntheHun on December 28, 2010 at 12:43 PM
I think the Romans called this Bribes & Patronage. Our names are much better.
lm10001 on December 28, 2010 at 12:44 PM
Lisa Murkowski begins wringing her hands and salivating…..
portlandon on December 28, 2010 at 12:45 PM
In other words, there is no way to stop RINO’s like me from using workarounds/end runs/soft earmarks…
yubley on December 28, 2010 at 12:47 PM
That’s OK. We can find creative ways to vote them out of office too.
mizflame98 on December 28, 2010 at 12:48 PM
Harlots with different labels and different letters. The taxpayers are scroomed either way.
The biggest exploiters will be the “No labels”. They can add “no transparency” to their designation.
Schadenfreude on December 28, 2010 at 12:50 PM
Gosh, and the same critics always say the Republicans never have any ideas.
MassVictim on December 28, 2010 at 12:51 PM
I might be wrong but I don’t think tricky is what our shiny new Congress should be shooting for. Especially since the MSM will be all too happy to point Republican hypocrisy and the public is all to tired of being treated like they are stupid. I don’t see this working out.
Cindy Munford on December 28, 2010 at 1:04 PM
I see your point and don’t disagree, but looked at from a different perspective it could work out great! If Democrats and RINO’s continue their corruption and the tea party doesn’t partake, it could add even more fuel to and stoke the flames of the tea party even higher in ’12.
We’ll just have big ol’ tea party celebration and primary all of the corrupt bastages that won’t give up the pork and backroom double-dealing.
FloatingRock on December 28, 2010 at 1:23 PM
The fact that they (or he) is even trying it is beyond infuriating. If the Dems get involved the MSM may be more reluctant to report it but I still think the Tea Party will figure it out. Woe be unto those members of this “glorious” institution.
Cindy Munford on December 28, 2010 at 1:43 PM
With Republicans like this, who needs Democrats?
Corruption like this is what drives undecided voters into the arms of the leftists AND discourages actual conservatives from showing up on election day.
leereyno on December 29, 2010 at 7:12 PM