Fighting the mandate in ObamaCare will only bring about single-payer
But here’s the rub: You can’t force health plans to offer coverage to everyone, regardless of medical condition, if you don’t make sure everyone is in the insurance pool. Without such a mandate, people have an incentive to wait until they get sick to buy coverage. Insurance can’t work that way. The result is a classic insurance “death spiral” in which, on average, sicker people are in the pool, which makes premiums rise, which in turn forces healthier people out of coverage they can’t afford, which then leaves the pool filled with even sicker people on average, which sends premiums higher again, and so on. This is why states that have forced insurers to accept all comers without also having a coverage mandate (such as New York and New Jersey) have seen rates soar and coverage shrink — hardly what officials intended. This is Health Insurance 101. (The other piece is that you need subsidies for low-income folks if you’re going to have the mandate, which is why Obamacare is expensive.)…
So, conservatives, be careful what you wish for. By fighting the mandate needed to make private insurance solutions work, and doing nothing to ease the health cost burden on everyday Americans, you’ll hasten the day when the public throws up its hands and says, “Just give us single-payer and price controls.” Don’t think the anti-government wave this fall won’t reverse itself on health care if the most private sector-oriented health care system on earth keeps delivering the world’s costliest, most inefficient care.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Idiot, we are damned if we do and damned if we don’t. The whole Bill is designed to bring about single payer no matter what we do or don’t do. Better to fight the tyranny than let it slowly take over.
jawkneemusic on October 21, 2010 at 7:03 PM
It’s true. And that’s why the whole shebang has to be repeale — and quickly, before we lose too many insurors.
S. Weasel on October 21, 2010 at 7:04 PM
I’m ready to dance.
artist on October 21, 2010 at 7:07 PM
The surrender now before its too late tactic. Works every time!
sharrukin on October 21, 2010 at 7:08 PM
So let’s just do nothing.
That sounds like a great plan.
doodleduh on October 21, 2010 at 7:09 PM
Mr. Miller…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OTSQozWP-rM&feature=player_embedded
artist on October 21, 2010 at 7:11 PM
In a real world, you can’t buy insurance after you get sick. But not anymore. Since Obamacare turned into a welfare program…I guess you could look at it that way.
lorien1973 on October 21, 2010 at 7:12 PM
Well I don’t know about you guys. But I’m convinced.
Best just get in line for my government mandated healthcare, then drive home in my government mandated car, then go in my government mandated house, eat my government mandated food, sleep with my government mandated wife/husband, then wake up and go to my government mandated job.
And a big ol’ sarc tag here.
Gatsu on October 21, 2010 at 7:12 PM
Hah. As if Obamacare won’t bring about single payer anyways. Idiot. I don’t want to fight just the mandate. Repeal the whole danged thing!
SouthernGent on October 21, 2010 at 7:13 PM
This is my concern exactly. They need to repeal the damned thing and forget about this challenge to nowhere.
Buy Danish on October 21, 2010 at 7:13 PM
Who will continue lending money to the Americans to prop up their expenditures?
Kralizec on October 21, 2010 at 7:16 PM
Single payer? Says who? Let’s say a judge deems it unconstitutional. All we have to do is fight this until 2012 and make sure we get a Republican President. Then we can pass the reforms that we want (tort reform, insurance across state lines etc).That’s why I don’t understand those who support Romney. He has been discredited on this issue. He can not carry this message.
Tasha on October 21, 2010 at 7:18 PM
That mandate thing only works if the penalty is something meaningful, otherwise you get a classic insurance death spiral of people paying the fine until they need insurance. That must be in Health Insurance 102.
rw on October 21, 2010 at 7:19 PM
If it was really the Left’s goal to simply have coverage for everyone, they would have just expanded Medicaid. Or just get rid of the government programs and subsidize the insurance companies with enough money so that the cheapest plan could be afforded by virtually anyone (the same way we subsidize U.S. agricutlure to keep the food cheap).
No, their goal is to CONTROL it in order to try and enforce EQUALITY.
There are several other ways to ensure everyone gets covered other than the Obamacare mandate.
WisCon on October 21, 2010 at 7:22 PM
The hardest part about this will be getting people to understand that health care is not a right, but a purchasable product.
If you can’t afford it, you can’t have it, is a principle that died with the birth of the never-never.
OldEnglish on October 21, 2010 at 7:23 PM
It’s this false argument that gets set up that people without critical thinking skills fall for the socialist gab.
We do not have to have individual mandates to force insurance companies to be unable to deny coverage.
The cost of insurance for those folks will be exorbitant (as they should be) the point of the individual mandate is to spread the wealth around and make me and other healthy people who don’t use insurance that much pay our “fair share” for someone else’s insurance plan.
That is socialism. No debate. It is what it is.
ButterflyDragon on October 21, 2010 at 7:29 PM
I’m with Jim DeMint on this one. Repeal and replace.
John the Libertarian on October 21, 2010 at 7:30 PM
Having a mandate to have at least a high deductible plan is probably workable. Having a mandate that requires you to fund abortion, chiropracty, homeopathy, and every other liberal wet dream is too much.
A mandate is at least a step towards getting it away from employer based plans.
pedestrian on October 21, 2010 at 7:33 PM
songle payer? no it will not because there is not enough votes to pass single payer therefore repealing Obamacare will not bring about single payer. Are these people insane?
unseen on October 21, 2010 at 7:34 PM
Unless the price of the insurance is in the form of an up front payment equal to the projected cost of the diagnosis, then the mandate on insurance companies to not deny will cause them to raise rates on everyone else.
pedestrian on October 21, 2010 at 7:36 PM
Congratulations. You’re one of them now.
Government shouldn’t be in the business of mandating we buy anything.
lorien1973 on October 21, 2010 at 7:39 PM
I think you guys missed the point of this article. It wasn’t that just repealing the mandate will result in single payer, so therefore we should not fight it. It was that the pre-ObamaCare system was broken:
So if the pre-ObamaCare system continues without any fixes, eventually health care will become so expensive without being effective enough to justify the expense that people will demand single payer.
John the Libertarian gets this point:
tneloms on October 21, 2010 at 7:40 PM
Get the government and insurance out of the cost and there will not be a $800 tooth brush that is rubbered stamped to be paid. Then when the free market Walmart hospital will have the the lowest prices everywhere and be the best in town. Or the people will go across the street the the Home Depot Hospital or the Dr. Pepper Health care center.
tjexcite on October 21, 2010 at 7:53 PM
Correct. But I wouldn’t be forced to purchase health insurance at those increased rates. I can choose to pay my health costs out of pocket. Or go without health care. Or just go buy me a catastrophic health insurance plan.
I have choices.
The free market works on every level. Government meddling in the health care market is one of the reason health care insurance has increased so much over the years.
ButterflyDragon on October 21, 2010 at 8:03 PM
Elsewhere in the article, Miller writes:
Well there you go. The whole rationale for the law: Obama wants it. Constitution be damned – to hell with what the people want – screw freedom of choice.
Obama wants it so it must be done.
DamnCat on October 21, 2010 at 8:15 PM
Then I assume the leftist scum will fight the mandate as well?
These filthy, fascists progs would never want to have complete ownership of a fully nationalized system. If they did, then they wouldn’t have the (imaginary) free market to blame when it all goes horribly wrong.
Rae on October 21, 2010 at 8:17 PM
I agree. However, if the courts strike the mandate provision down, there is the chance the whole law goes down because of the lack of a severence clause (and a pissed demagogued Supreme Court can’t hurt).
However with the individual mandate, it would also throw millions out of an increasingly expensive private insurance into an underfunded Medicare, which is already collapsing and unable to provide care. Millions who had insurance now unable to see a doctor will give more opposition to Obama.
redeye on October 21, 2010 at 8:27 PM
Correction,
I meant “However, without the individual mandate…”
redeye on October 21, 2010 at 8:28 PM
You would think so. But the people who put this thing together didn’t want the fine to be large. It benefits them to have no one pay it – that way the system collapses that much faster, insurance companies go out of business paying out on guaranteed-issue policies and BAM the gov’t swoops in to “save” us with single-payer.
That’s how it was engineered.
Repealing the whole shebang is the only way to reverse this course.
Missy on October 21, 2010 at 8:36 PM
If we fight the mandate, we’ll get single-payer.
If we don’t fight the mandate, we’ll get single-payer.
So, given that the situation is completely hopeless, let’s fight like hell. Maybe the gummint will lose it’s taste for playing in the health care market.
applebutter on October 21, 2010 at 8:59 PM
Everything about Obamacare will bring about single-payer.
It should be repealed in full and sent to sleep with the fishes.
uknowmorethanme on October 21, 2010 at 9:17 PM
Miller has a point. The President’s put the noose around the neck of the private insurance industry and the mandate-repealers are trying to kick the chair out from under them.
I am as disgusted by the last 80 years of Commerce Clause as anyone else, but tactically this is not smart.
DrSteve on October 21, 2010 at 9:28 PM
The vast majority has health care with which they’re happy, that’s why Barry needed his “if you like it you can keep it” lie. Now, those of us who had been happy are getting significantly higher costs (my family wAsn’t happy with the extra $2,000 we shelled out this year) from higher premiums, higher deductibles and the government-mandated cut-backs in HSAs. Seniors love their Medicare Advantage and are losing it.
We BLAME the government intervention, we’d never look for more intervention to solve the problems it created. The only people who love obamacare are those who didn’t pay for medical care to begin with and the unions.
The unions have fully funded leaders’ luxe healthcare plans and pensions. Rank and files’ dues went to lobbyists, leaders and politics. Rank and file healthcare and pensions are dramatically underfunded. To a large extent Obamacare is a union bail out.
Don’t look to the rest of us to open our pocketbooks for unfunded union liabilities or to run to suck at the government teat because the government broke our health care plans. Instead, DC will meet the pitchforks Barry promised, albeit not in the form he expected.
obladioblada on October 21, 2010 at 9:57 PM