Damn Joe Sestak for admitting the job offer!
Why in the world did he go blabbing about it? What did he possibly think he had to gain? That’s the real mystery in this increasingly crazy case of the “job” offered to Rep. Joe Sestak by Bill Clinton on behalf of Barack Obama in return for agreeing to forgo his challenge to Republican-turned-Democrat Arlen Specter in the Pennsylvania Senate primary. During a radio appearance in February, Sestak told host Larry Kane that he’d been offered a position. “I’m not going to say who or how and what was offered,” Sestak said in a later interview. “I don’t feel it’s appropriate to go beyond what I said.”
OK, there are a few other mysteries as well. What was the “job,” for instance? And was it really a job, or just a fancy, important-sounding title with nothing much to do except set the guy up in the future? The White House has admitted that, at the behest of Rahm Emanuel, Clinton did inquire as to whether “Sestak would be interested in service on Presidential or other Senior Executive Branch Advisory Board.” Whatever that means, the White House insists that it does not mean the job of Secretary of the Navy…
Sestak, who enjoys a tiny lead over his opponent, conservative congressman Pat Toomey, is making news for all the wrong reasons, and will spend crucial campaign days dodging questions about just what went on. Obama’s White House, meanwhile, in refusing to give a straight answer about what went down and admit whatever it was that it did, is looking disingenuous and losing control of the discourse. (It’s true nobody was really shocked that there was gambling going on in the back room at Rick’s, but the arrests went through nevertheless.) But perhaps most important, the White House and Democrats need to see this incident as a wakeup call. Should they lose both houses in 2010 and with them, control of the relevant investigative committees, they will spend the next two years doing little else besides fighting these phony wars, just as the Clinton administration did in its final two. Before 1998, remember, presidents did what they wanted in the privacy of their own outer-offices and nobody ever thought of trying to impeach anybody for a little lovin’ on the side. They need to put this incident behind them and get back to stuff that actually matters to people… and therefore wins elections.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Translation: Truth is bad. Lies are good.
portlandon on May 29, 2010 at 10:03 PM
Why in the world did
he go blabbing about itObama offer the job? What did he possibly think he had to gain?…
FIFY
artist on May 29, 2010 at 10:04 PM
Yeh screw the rule of law. /
CWforFreedom on May 29, 2010 at 10:08 PM
They’re nervous there may be a principled Democrat who will ultimately spill the beans. They shouldn’t be, but, oh, it’s possible.
That’s not why he was impeached, and Alterman must know it. It was for lying afterwards. Like they’re doing now, but not under oath. Yet.
Marcus on May 29, 2010 at 10:11 PM
Yeah. Like honesty, integrity, morality, and a servants heart.
But these are Dems so who am I kidding?
Guardian on May 29, 2010 at 10:12 PM
“Anti-corruption laws are for thee, not me.”
RBMN on May 29, 2010 at 10:13 PM
The process
repeat
repeat
repeat
Soon it becomes the “truth”.
CWforFreedom on May 29, 2010 at 10:13 PM
Sure, but you can’t possibly expect honesty from the left on that issue. Well, on any issue, really.
Laura Curtis on May 29, 2010 at 10:14 PM
It would definitely be more useful for Obama to have a senior democrat senator rather than a newbie. Plus Harry Promised.
MetaThought on May 29, 2010 at 10:15 PM
MetaThought on May 29, 2010 at 10:15 PM
I was mocking Alterman.
artist on May 29, 2010 at 10:20 PM
Good Lord you’re posting Eric Alterman now?!?!?
Skywise on May 29, 2010 at 10:23 PM
Ahh the selective memory of Liberals, Pres Clinton was impeached for perjury not for getting some action.
And before 1998 nobody cared about president’s sex lives guess that whole James Buchanan not supporting his baby momma thing never happened.
Or Alexander Hamilton and his love of another man’s wife.
Glad I went to a University where I had to learn instead of just preen and work on my obnoxious accent.
LincolntheHun on May 29, 2010 at 10:31 PM
Clearly Watergate wasn’t taught in schools that this idiot attended. Guess he never heard of Watergate tapes either.
txmomof6 on May 29, 2010 at 10:34 PM
I’m thinkin’ the lunch with Clinton was in the private dining room because that is probably one of the few places there is no way to record any conversations or have any Secret Service within earshot.
txmomof6 on May 29, 2010 at 10:38 PM
Ha! It took 48 hours for this and Zero is rehearsing the lines already. Poor Joy Behar, she’s going to have to wait past the holiday until Tuesday for “people don’t care about this!”
Marcus on May 29, 2010 at 10:39 PM
Fixed it for you, Ewic.
Unfortunately for Altered-Reality here, Bill Clinton.s Justice Department successfully prosecuted a female Federal employee for lying under oath about sex. She worked for the VA, too.
Del Dolemonte on May 29, 2010 at 11:25 PM
Sestak: bucking the Omachine.
Soon to be the most popular pose in D.C.
profitsbeard on May 29, 2010 at 11:25 PM
Sestak’s an ass. I hope Obama and Clinton hang his ass out to dry.
funky chicken on May 29, 2010 at 11:33 PM
It’s offical not only does the government think they are above the law but the media now thinks that the government is also above the law.
the rule of Law is no longer the law of the land. we have crossed the Rubicon and now have a tin pot ceaser on our hands.
We as a nation must return ourselves to the rule of law and the concept that no one is above the law.
unseen on May 30, 2010 at 12:17 AM
This guy is a professor of journalism. He writes that they tried to impeach Clinton for a “little lovin’ on the side”.
A teacher who teaches future journalists doesn’t know that they actually did impeach Clinton, and impeached him for the crime of perjury and not a blow job, should not come as a surprise to anyone who ever talks to a liberal.
I love the part where he says he doubts the administration actually investigated anything. So he knows they’re all a bunch of liars but it’s all the fault of Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity. Typical liberal logic.
Jaynie59 on May 30, 2010 at 6:07 AM
Heh. They really unleashed the whirlwind when they decided to go after Richard Nixon with everything they had.
I wonder if any of them ever stop and ponder if it was worth it.
S. Weasel on May 30, 2010 at 6:39 AM
This guy brings up Claude Rains’s bit about feigning shock about gambling going on at Rick’s place, then ends his piece with what has to be the modern-day equivalent, intended for the same purpose: to deflect trouble by feigning righteousness.
Weasel.
Aitch748 on May 30, 2010 at 7:38 AM
Harry, Eddie Rendell, Biden and presumably Obama all promised Specter an unopposed primary if he flipped. Specter knew he’d have Toomey as an opponent if he ran in the GOP primary. And this time, Specter would not have Bush and Santorum to help him beat Toomey.
So the Dems had to get Sestak out of there when Arlen became the DEm 2010 candidate. And Harry was already in trouble because he promised Arlen he’d keep his senate seniority on committees. Harry couldn’t deliver (the caucus balked at it), so Harry and the Dems really had to try to keep the other promise.
Sestak wasn’t playing along because he had had plans as far as 2008 to run for senate against a GOP Specter. (The House is not big enough for Sestak’s ego.) Sestak was presumably quietly encouraged at first in senate ambitions by the Dems, who needed someone to oppose the GOP Specter. Then Sestak was told he’d have to wait another six years, when now-Dem Arlen would presumably retire.
But Sestak is an impatient man. All the threats, pleas for party loyalty, etc., Sestak got didn’t work. So they thought they’d try a high-level job to keep him happy until 2016.
Wethal on May 30, 2010 at 8:13 AM
Eric Alterman is the most highly underrated scumbag journalist out there. He’s on par with the Olbermanns and Sanchezs of the world, but doesn’t get nearly the attention.
Check out his laughably ridiculous hit jobs in “Boogie Man,” which is an unfair documentary of Lee Atwater.
Red Cloud on May 30, 2010 at 8:47 AM
Alterman is actually in a position of teaching others, yet he can’t understand that at the time Sestak had a world to gain by separating himself from the corrupt insider’s network that runs the Crat Party and much of DC?
But more than for abject stupidity, he should be fired on the spot for his unethical suggestion that Sestak should have covered up the transgression. Consider that this guy teaches journalism, and it becomes easier to understand the mess this nation is in.
What.a.jerk.
paul1149 on May 30, 2010 at 9:03 AM
I’m not as curious anymore about what job Obama offered Sestak originally as much as I’m curious now as to what Obama offered to cause him to now agree that it was “no big deal.” You’d think it had to be something big to cause Sestak to walk back from a rather damning accusation.
katiejane on May 30, 2010 at 9:08 AM
apparent he’s impatient, and too damn honest to be a Democrat. He’s stepped outside the crooked party line and violated the inviolable truth, that is, you shall lie for other Democrats to your dying day.
ain’t it funny when the Democrat in the most trouble are the ones that tell the truth.
ted c on May 30, 2010 at 9:13 AM
Jeez, Eric, get the facts before you whine about this.
Larry Kane, a very good local reporter, got a tip that Sestak had been offered a bigtime job by the White House to get him out of the Senate race. He asked Sestak point-blank about it in an interview. What was Sestak supposed to do? Lie? He isn’t very good at Clintonesque obfuscation. A “no comment” would have sent the local media here into a feeding frenzy. Instead, he told the truth, which may have been inconvenient for the White House, but it was very convenient for Sestak because it made him appear as The Man Of Integrity who was impervious to the siren songs of power and position. Which one does he think Sestak should have chosen? Does this guy have any idea what sort of person Joe Sestak is?
rockmom on May 30, 2010 at 9:32 AM
Exactly right. Dems in PA tried to get Sestak to run for Governor, since they have a very weak field there, and leave Specter alone. He refused; he likes Washington too much and wanted nothing to do with the jerkwater town of Harrisburg. Clinton created a monster with this guy.
rockmom on May 30, 2010 at 9:35 AM
Sestak also wanted to be the “I can’t be bought” outsider compared to that old DC insider Arlen, who could be bought to fip to Dem with promises from Harry Reid.
Wethal on May 30, 2010 at 10:29 AM
All one needs to know about Ewic is that one of his heroes is I.F. “Izzy” Stone.
Del Dolemonte on May 30, 2010 at 10:42 AM