<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"><title>HotAir</title><link>https://hotair.com/headlines/archives/2009/12/28/clyburn-on-second-thought-who-needs-the-public-option/feed/</link><description>HotAir is the leading conservative blog for breaking news and commentary covering the Biden administration, politics, media, culture, and current elections.</description><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 15:19:11 -0400</lastBuildDate><item><title>Clyburn: On second thought, who needs the public option?</title><description>&lt;![CDATA[Asked on CBS&amp;#8217; &amp;#8220;Face the Nation&amp;#8221; if he could back a bill without the public plan, he said &amp;#8220;Yes, sir, I can. Because why did we do&amp;#8211; why do we want a public option? We want a public option to do basically three ten&amp;#8211; things: create more choice for insurers, create more competition for insurance companies, and to contain costs.&amp;#8221;]]&gt;</description><pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 08:50:05 -0500</pubDate><creator xmlns="dc">&lt;![CDATA[Allahpundit]]&gt;</creator><enclosure url="" type="image/jpeg" length="123" /><link>https://hotair.com/headlines/2009/12/28/clyburn-on-second-thought-who-needs-the-public-option-n220781</link></item></channel></rss>