Headlines

NYT

Maureen Dowd fantasizing now about kicking Cheney in the shins

Read the Article

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

I suppose this is the progressive tolerance I’ve been told about. Let’s restrain ourselves when it comes to dealing with nations that kill our troops, but by all means we’ll kick the Vice President of the United States in the shins.

amerpundit on January 11, 2009 at 3:03 PM

Interrogating terrorists at least has a purpose besides hurting someone..

the_nile on January 11, 2009 at 3:05 PM

Just as when [George W Bush] was in the National Guard and didn’t bother to show up

Woooow….this woman is so sad and pathetic.

And who the hell invited her to Brit Hume’s party?

jimmy the notable on January 11, 2009 at 3:10 PM

You do that, Maureen. Then when Biden is sworn in as VP in 9 days, you kick him in the shins too. Gotta be fair (and Biden was also responsible for the decisions made in gov’t too).

I’ll hold my breath until you do that….

mjk on January 11, 2009 at 3:11 PM

I get so angry every time a lib goes on about how Bush/Cheney defiled the constitution, how they trampled all over the bill of rights, can someone please, please tell me what right you have lost under Bush? What civil liberties you have been denied since Bush took office? Anyone?

saltydogg14 on January 11, 2009 at 3:12 PM

You know, she was always pretty goofy, but I don’t remember her being so hateful years ago when I used to actually read her sometimes. Same as with Joe Klein. They’re both terminal BDS cases. It makes them sound like impotent angry toddlers. Anklebiters.

juliesa on January 11, 2009 at 3:15 PM

She got it wrong about Cheney going back to Casper. He’s going back home to Jackson, WY, with a stop in Casper.

juliesa on January 11, 2009 at 3:26 PM

They are all this way nowadays, juliesa. Or at least a lot of them are.

They’ve been fantasizing about violence against the administration for years now.

It just makes you wonder. What sort of people they are.

Alana on January 11, 2009 at 3:30 PM

Well, we should have seen this coming.

As soon as the direct threat/danger passed, the second-guessers – the same ones demanding back then that we be protected – are now on their self righteous crusade.

The revolt of the, now safe, elites.

SteveMG on January 11, 2009 at 3:34 PM

I will not click on anything written by this bitter shrew.

Babino on January 11, 2009 at 4:17 PM

Aww, isn’t that precious. She must be awfully difficult to live with. It must be horrible to be her husband.

Oh, wait.

Red Cloud on January 11, 2009 at 4:18 PM

Today’s NYT is nothing but “war crimes” drivel. Dowd is a hack. What will these guys write about in the coming weeks? Frank Rich’s head will explode when the Messiah doesn’t close Gitmo or hold trials. Amazing what an intel brief can do to someone’s view of things. “major dad” writes

tree hugging sister on January 11, 2009 at 4:27 PM

maureen please just fantasize how you will pleasure mr o so mrs o can rip your head off

film at 11

lexa on January 11, 2009 at 4:55 PM

Sure, she would. She dreams about it, the bitter hag.

Lefties are like her. See this from 2000

Oct 19, 2000 | Al Gore has endured criticism for years that he’s constantly giving his image a makeover. Now Inside.com reports that Rolling Stone magazine airbrushed some of Gore’s assets in its latest issue. Apparently, a certain bulge in the vice president’s pants had to be “brought down a bit” in the photo adorning the rock magazine’s cover. Despite Gore’s reputation for being stiff, Rolling Stone’s Jann Wenner liked what he saw when he and Will Dana interviewed the candidate. “I urge you to vote for him,” Wenner writes in a separate editorial.

Of course, now the current VP’s package, and Gore’s are forgotten for this One.

Entelechy on January 11, 2009 at 5:07 PM

Since the NYT is continuing to take on water in spite of its stellar line up of rapier wits, Ms Dowd, who actually used to be fun to read, once, will probably find herself looking for work in the lesser pubs where she will be well appreciated but make fewer appearances on Hot Air. It is only working for the Times that gives her cache. She really doesn’t have much new to say any more.

mytralman on January 11, 2009 at 5:22 PM

Maureen Dowd fantasizing now about kicking Cheney in the shins

Of course she is. He’s the only man she knows who wouldn’t hit her back.

Tanya on January 11, 2009 at 5:51 PM

I’m fantasizing about Dowd in front of Cheney, who’s holding a shotgun full of rock salt… Mmmm, good!

rmgraha on January 11, 2009 at 6:02 PM

But a girl can fantasize.

So can a guy, I guess. I know lots of guys who’d like to spit in your face.

petefrt on January 11, 2009 at 6:23 PM

Lynne would stomp her silly. Sillier.

baldilocks on January 11, 2009 at 6:31 PM

I get so angry every time a lib goes on about how Bush/Cheney defiled the constitution, how they trampled all over the bill of rights, can someone please, please tell me what right you have lost under Bush? What civil liberties you have been denied since Bush took office? Anyone?

saltydogg14 on January 11, 2009 at 3:12 PM

I heard a middle-aged guy ranting about that stuff in a grocery store just before the election, near a table where a couple of women were registering voters. I just glared at him. I wanted to say something, but I didn’t…but what I would have done is asked him that very thing.

It’s all just liberal hysterics.

As for Maureen Dowd, I fantasize about dropping her off in the middle of Tehran in an outfit from Frederick’s of Hollywood.

capitalist piglet on January 11, 2009 at 6:32 PM

Starting to look like the long years of violent leftist fantasies aren’t quite over yet.

Should have known, I mean, have they changed their stripes since the French revolution? No. Not gonna change ‘em now.

The “peace & love” crap was just propaganda.

Merovign on January 11, 2009 at 6:48 PM

I see yet another Pulitzer in MoDo’s future.

benny shakar on January 11, 2009 at 6:50 PM

You know how bad the New York Times has gotten? The goats in my petting zoo won’t eat it anymore!

radjah shelduck on January 11, 2009 at 7:02 PM

Should have known, I mean, have they changed their stripes since the French revolution? No. Not gonna change ‘em now.

Merovign on January 11, 2009 at 6:48 PM

So right are you.

petefrt on January 11, 2009 at 7:24 PM

I see yet another Pulitzer in MoDo’s future.

benny shakar on January 11, 2009 at 6:50 PM

Well, we actually agree on something, sort of! I see a Pew-litzer for Ms. Dowdy when they start awarding them to bitter ex-girlfriends of movie stars who dumped them and marry a really hot babe, and who now write assinine, snarky columns while suffering from a headache from too many Cosmopolitans the night before

TeeDee on January 11, 2009 at 7:50 PM

Meh, NY Times will be out of bidness by year end. Why get worked up over anything written on its pages?

angryed on January 11, 2009 at 8:45 PM