SCOTUS Waves Off Kari Lake Lawsuit Over Electronic Voting

Lake, who filed the lawsuit during her failed campaign for governor in 2022, challenged whether the state’s electronic voting machines assured “a fair and accurate vote.” Two lower courts dismissed the suit, finding that Lake and former Republican state lawmaker Mark Finchem had not been harmed in a way that allowed them to sue.

Advertisement

Calling the precise nature of Lake’s claim “not clear,” the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals said the lawsuit was based on speculative concerns that the machines could be hacked.

Although Lake and Finchem cited “opinions by purported experts on manipulation risk” in the lawsuit, they did “not contend that any electronic tabulation machine in Arizona has ever been hacked,” the appeals court said. On appeal, the court continued, lawyers for Lake “conceded that their arguments were limited to potential future hacking, and not based on any past harm.”

Ed Morrissey

In order to file a lawsuit over public policy, one has to show demonstrable and material harm. Otherwise, it becomes a political question. The choice of voting systems is clearly a policy issue that should be fought in the state legislature, not the federal courts. 

For what it's worth, I agree with Lake on the policy; we should all use paper ballots with the ability to scan and tabulate the vote quickly and accurately. I was very happy when my county in Texas made that change in this cycle. But that's a policy matter, not a legal question. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Trending on HotAir Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement