Green Room

Is California “ungovernable” after 40 years of Democratic domination?

posted at 3:20 pm on February 22, 2014 by

Well, maybe, although there’s a solution for it that’s slightly less extreme than splitting California into six new states. The age-old impulse to partition the Golden State took a new direction, thanks to a Silicon Valley entrepreneur, who has won approval to collect signatures for his new ballot measure, which has precisely zero chance of ultimately succeeding. Instead of two states, Tim Draper wants a half-dozen out of California:

A plan to divide California into six separate US states is closer to making it on to a November ballot, with organizers gaining approval to collect signatures.

The seemingly far-fetched initiative, sponsored by Silicon Valley venture capitalist Tim Draper, claims “political representation of California’s diverse population and economies has rendered the state nearly ungovernable.”

And on Tuesday, the California Secretary of State’s office gave the movement a boost, saying that proponents “may begin collecting petition signatures.”

He’ll need over 800,000 signatures before mid-July to make the ballot, but that’s not going to be the big hurdle. Neither will the election, although it’s doubtful it will get that far, because Californians aren’t going to vote to dismember the state. And even if they did, Congress is not going to add 10 more Senate seats for Californians to hold.

So yes, this is a pipe dream at best. But it does raise some interesting questions about California, because Draper’s certainly correct that the state has chronically incompetent governance. Instead of dismembering California, though, maybe voters should stop electing Democrats to state offices and overwhelming Democratic majorities to the legislature, as they have for decades (especially the legislature). No one was complaining about the state being “ungovernable” when Republicans won statewide offices, and when Ronald Reagan was governor.

Recently in the Green Room:

Blowback

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2

I don’t understand how California could get past this clause

no new State shall be formed or erected within the Jurisdiction of any other State

However, Maine and West Virginia got past this clause, so maybe the Constitution has always been more of a guideline than anything else. I understand the North used the Civil War as an excuse for West Virginia, but that hardly seems reasonable.

Al in St. Lou on February 23, 2014 at 12:19 PM

You left some important text out of the clause. The Constitution actually says

no new state shall be formed or erected within the jurisdiction of any other state, nor any state be formed by the junction of two or more states, without the consent of the legislatures of the states concerned, as well as of the Congress.

So if everyone agrees including Congress, it’s permitted. That’s what happened with Maine; Massachusetts agreed to permit the secession if Main voters approved, they did, and Congress passed a bill approving it as part of the Missouri Compromise. Maine didn’t “get past” anything.

I haven’t looked up West Virginia, but I think at the time Virginia had already seceded, so it could be argued that it was no longer a state and this clause didn’t apply.

ajb3 on February 24, 2014 at 8:55 PM

Comment pages: 1 2


HotAir — Politics, Culture, Media, 2017, Breaking News from a conservative viewpoint
Top Pick

“it has not taken serious steps to end its own complicity in trafficking, including forced laborers from North Korea.”

Currently doing a search for “good international trade lawyers”

Ransomware attack spreads through Europe

John Sexton Jun 27, 2017 1:01 PM

“A massive ransomware campaign is currently unfolding worldwide.”

At least their address rarely changes

It just keeps on happening

“Trump is good for business right now.”

Start spreading the news…

“Now it’s time for the next step.”

A “cryptic” warning to Bashar al-Assad?

Jazz Shaw Jun 27, 2017 8:01 AM

The three strikes rule may be in effect

CNN reporters resign over retracted story

John Sexton Jun 26, 2017 9:21 PM

“The individuals all stated that they accepted responsibility and wanted to resign.”

Federalism’s greatest champion is now …

Ed Morrissey Jun 26, 2017 8:41 PM

“In the end, we’re a democracy.”

“Almost all controversial speech harms people, upsets or offends them…”

Obama: Back home again in Indonesia

Andrew Malcolm Jun 26, 2017 7:21 PM

The call to prayer and eating dog.

Testing the waters.

“primarily because the penalty for not having insurance would be eliminated.”

“If I were a Seattle lawmaker, I would be thinking hard about the $15 an hour phase-in.”

Days of future past

“Not only are taxpayers footing the bill, but people are dying unnecessarily because of this.”

Israel settles who can stand where at the Western Wall

Andrew Malcolm Jun 26, 2017 3:21 PM

Women to the right, men to the left.

Look on the bright side. There’s less snow in the summer

Big win … but for how long?

“Several Russian cities have unveiled monuments to Stalin in recent months.”

Massive disappointment

Emboldened conservative wing?

It’s more about the powers of the Presidency at this point

A second look at paper ballots?

Jazz Shaw Jun 26, 2017 10:41 AM

Low tech solutions to high tech crime

No extra beatings required, thanks

A “”massive, massive f*** up…”

This is totally amazing!

McConnell may not get his wish on health care vote

Taylor Millard Jun 25, 2017 7:31 PM

Senate leadership wants a vote this week, others say, “Negative, Ghost Rider.”

Helping others without the government.

“…the reality is the reality.”

These kiosks don’t make $15 per hour or need benefits

Going for the record

“We will answer them on the field”