Green Room

Surprise: Officials confirm security breach on Vermont’s Obamacare exchange

posted at 4:16 pm on November 25, 2013 by

Democrats run the show in liberal Vermont, where the state government has set up a foundering and costly Obamacare exchange — free from the pervasive and insidious threat of “Republican obstructionism.”  Nothing to see here, Vermont residents:

Officials overseeing the Vermont Health Connect website confirmed Friday there was a security breach on the system last month in which one user got improper access to another user’s Social Security number and other data. A report from state to federal officials overseeing the health insurance exchanges set up under the Affordable Care Act said a consumer reported the incident with the Vermont Health Connect website on Oct. 17. The consumer, whom officials would not identify, reported that he received in the mail — from an unnamed sender — a copy of his own application for insurance under the state exchange. “On the back of the envelope was hand-written ‘VERMONT HEALTH CONNECT IS NOT A SECURE WEBSITE!’ This was also (written) on the back of the last page of the printed out application,” said the incident report. The report was prepared by Greg Needle, privacy administrator with Vermont Health Connect, and filed with the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. The Associated Press obtained it after a request under the state public records law to the Department of Vermont Health Access. The report did not identify the individual consumers involved in the breach.

Vermont’s Obamacare chief has assured citizens that this error was isolated and has been “responded to appropriately.” So we’re all good.  Thus far, news stories on Obamacare data security breaches have involved honest citizens and IT specialists probing for weaknesses.  Might there be other characters out there exploiting unknown vulnerabilities for more nefarious purposes?  Not to worry; Kathleen Sebelius “feels like” the websites are secure, even as security experts urge the administration to take Healthcare.gov off-line until safeguards are enhanced.  And why wouldn’t people trust her casual assessment over the urgent warnings of people whose expertise lies in the realm of online security?  Suck it up and carry on, folks.  It’s not like the navigators handling your private data might be convicted felons, or anything.

Recently in the Green Room:

Blowback

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Another gift from the government to you, the taxpayer – NEARLY-GUARANTEED IDENTITY THEFT!

Enjoy!

Good Lt on November 25, 2013 at 4:26 PM

ObamaCare is like your favorite STD.

It keeps on giving….

Turtle317 on November 25, 2013 at 4:38 PM

And yet I find I don’t care because dollars to donuts the person whose identity was stolen most likely is a raging liberal. Reap-Sow, Dogs-Fleas yadda yadda yadda.

neyney on November 25, 2013 at 4:44 PM

Today we are being encouraged to enroll voluntarily.

Tomorrow, the government will hire a legion of people behind the scenes who will cull your data, build a profile and some “insurance plan” FOR you, and the next time you go to your doctor or pharmacy, you will find that you have been “flagged” and will be pressured to sign up for it. Perhaps someone will actually call you on the telephone…or ring your doorbell someday with legal authority like the census people.

Why do you think dems spent all that money and time on database building?

RushBaby on November 25, 2013 at 5:08 PM

Why do you think dems spent all that money and time on database building?

RushBaby on November 25, 2013 at 5:08 PM

And over a billion bullets!!

Deano1952 on November 25, 2013 at 5:38 PM

Fun fact: If Vermont’s Obamacare site were run by a private company, that company would now be subject under HIPAA to civil fines of $50,000 per affected user, and the DOJ would have the option of pursuing criminal charges against the company’s managers with jail terms of up to 5 years. Plus if the victims could show actual damages, they’d be able to pursue tort claims of their own. But, hey, it’s a government website, so none of that applies–it’s a 100% accountability-free environment! Way to go, Vermont!

Fabozz on November 25, 2013 at 5:42 PM

I was just going to write what Fabozz did. And that’s probably just the tip of the proverbial iceberg. I’m sure the fed is violating all manner of regulations with Zerocare.

raz0r on November 25, 2013 at 6:04 PM

And they’ve never lied or been mistaken about the ACA or the website before so of course we should believe them when they say the website “feels” secure.

talkingpoints on November 25, 2013 at 8:51 PM

“Feels like”?? What a moron!

Sherman1864 on November 25, 2013 at 9:08 PM

if you like your identity you can keep it…obmamacare

jaywemm on November 26, 2013 at 12:52 AM

Wow, who could have seen this coming?

Chris of Rights on November 26, 2013 at 8:07 AM

I love how only one identity can be confirmed to be compromised. Is that because there’s only one person actually in the system deep enough to actually have their identity in there to be stolen?

GWB on November 26, 2013 at 9:04 AM

Gotta go with KS on this one. The admin also got assurances from the Iranians that they won’t go nuclear. Kerry feels good about that, so we’re all good.

You wingnuts just don’t have the skills that brilliant Dems like Kerry and Sebelius have.

mankai on November 26, 2013 at 10:37 AM

This only happened to one person, which means that 50% of VT enrollees have been affected.

mankai on November 26, 2013 at 10:38 AM


HotAir — Politics, Culture, Media, 2017, Breaking News from a conservative viewpoint

Fixing crime in America is a complicated issue

Taylor Millard Jun 23, 2017 8:31 PM
Top Pick

Cops alone won’t solve it.

Top Pick

Victim’s father was President Maduro’s supervisor back when he was a bus driver.

Democrats forgot all about the “era of good feelings”

“Bernie and Jane Sanders have lawyered up.”

“the Judiciary Committee is examining the circumstances surrounding the removal of James Comey.”

Winning isn’t everything. It is the only thing

Trump signs VA reform bill into law

John Sexton Jun 23, 2017 2:41 PM

“What happened was a national disgrace, and yet some of the employees involved in these scandals remained on the payrolls.”

A new era of something.

“…died suddenly in less than a week just after his return to the U.S.”

The shortsightedness of “Denounce and Preserve”

Taylor Millard Jun 23, 2017 12:11 PM

Pragmatism for the sake of pragmatism doesn’t always work.

Perhaps if you threw in a new car?

Gay marriages still growing, but not as fast

Andrew Malcolm Jun 23, 2017 10:31 AM

More, but not as quickly.

Should’ve stuck with the pirate gig. It was working for him

The battle for the rubble of Raqqa is underway

Andrew Malcolm Jun 23, 2017 8:51 AM

Won’t be much left.

Your list of demands is a publicity stunt

“what happened that day was emblematic of a deeply troubling trend among progressives…”

“The jobs are still leaving. Nothing has stopped.”

Bad vendor. Bad! No cookie!

“The Corps is just starting to grapple with the issues the court has identified.”

“So you want me to sing my praises, is that what you’re saying?”

Why would we possibly want that?

“I mean he sold our country to The Russians.”

I could think of someone else you might want to ask about…

“You can ask a hundred people what hate speech is and you get a thousand different answers”

Trump: I never made any recordings of Comey

Allahpundit Jun 22, 2017 2:01 PM

Bluff.

Hackers stole private data from election databases

John Sexton Jun 22, 2017 1:21 PM

“90,000 records stolen by Russian state actors contained drivers license numbers”

Failure to protect the city

Big man on the Middle Eastern campus

Biased Americans see media as biased.

Tough times down on the liberal ranch

Will Nancy Pelosi survive this latest Dem disaster?

Andrew Malcolm Jun 22, 2017 8:41 AM

Eat quick, before it’s gone.

Slow your roll, boss

“I’m bothered by the lack of emerging evidence…”

FIrst look at the Senate health bill

John Sexton Jun 21, 2017 9:21 PM

“the Senate bill would go farther than the House version in its approach to cutting Medicaid spending.”

Divide and conquer?