Green Room

Seeing the future: The NYT on the NSA, March 1983

posted at 9:44 am on August 23, 2013 by

Making the rounds today on Twitter. Here’s the eerie final paragraph:

No laws define the limits of the N.S.A.’s power. No Congressional committee subjects the agency’s budget to a systematic, informed and skeptical review. With unknown billions of Federal dollars, the agency purchases the most sophisticated communications and computer equipment in the world. But truly to comprehend the growing reach of this formidable organization, it is necessary to recall once again how the computers that power the N.S.A. are also gradually changing lives of Americans – the way they bank, obtain benefits from the Government and communicate with family and friends. Every day, in almost every area of culture and commerce, systems and procedures are being adopted by private companies and organizations as well as by the nation’s security leaders that make it easier for the N.S.A. to dominate American society should it ever decide such action is necessary.

Can’t wait for the 2043 version.

Recently in the Green Room:



Trackback URL


Can’t wait for the 2043 version.

Um, the way things are going, you will not have to wait anywhere near that long, AP.

Difficultas_Est_Imperium on August 23, 2013 at 9:56 AM

They are such great journalists when a Repub is president. /

nobar on August 23, 2013 at 10:04 AM

I remember reading Digital Fortress by Dan Brown, and he described the NSA in a similar way. I thought it was silly at the time. Not anymore.

bluegill on August 23, 2013 at 11:08 AM

I remember reading Digital Fortress by Dan Brown, and he described the NSA in a similar way.

or the lefty movie, ‘sneakers.’

truecon on August 23, 2013 at 12:01 PM

Too many republic rats like this power grab. They’ve made a separate peace with demon rats, and the only solution is to rip the power away from them.

The Liberty Amendments – Mark Levin….

deadite on August 24, 2013 at 10:59 AM

Huh. I would have guessed 1984.

SomeCallMeJohn on August 25, 2013 at 11:29 AM

And who was President in 1983? Why were the liberals so concerned? And did whatever the NYT claim might happen come to pass in the past 30 years?

Fast forward, and here we are, carping about a liberal President and the NSA.

unclesmrgol on August 25, 2013 at 4:39 PM

HotAir — Politics, Culture, Media, 2017, Breaking News from a conservative viewpoint

Just a reminder: People will die

Allahpundit Jun 28, 2017 10:41 PM
Top Pick

“Whipped cream’s killing more people than ever before.”

Top Pick

Medicare for all?

“There comes a point where you gotta get off the crazy train.”

Poll: Dem voters glumly sticking with Pelosi

Ed Morrissey Jun 28, 2017 8:41 PM

Disaster ahead?

“When she left it, it was in better shape than it had ever been.”

Manafort, firm registers as foreign agents

Ed Morrissey Jun 28, 2017 6:41 PM

Better late than never?

Delivered as promised

“I would like to think that the president saved many innocent men, women and children.”

“The Russia investigation was by far the dominant topic…”

The merry little media war continues.

Criminal enterprise

Politico: Has the SPLC lost its way?

John Sexton Jun 28, 2017 3:01 PM

“The organization has always tried to find ways to milk money out of the public…”

Trump legal team backing away from Comey complaint?

Ed Morrissey Jun 28, 2017 2:31 PM


Time to get up and go to work, sir

CNN gets glum, defensive after resignations

John Sexton Jun 28, 2017 1:01 PM

“If Jeff lit himself on fire, it wouldn’t appease the pro-Trump media.”

Hmmm: FBI probing Russia-based anti-virus firm?

Ed Morrissey Jun 28, 2017 12:31 PM

“I wouldn’t put their stuff on my computer if you paid me.”

He works hard for the money…

It’s not a slippery slope. It’s a freaking avalanche.


Showdown: Sarah Palin vs the New York Times

Jazz Shaw Jun 28, 2017 9:21 AM


Credit where creditor’s due?

More flash than bang, but a very bad sign

“Felix was out on bond after threatening another public servant and has a history of making threats.”

Chaffetz: House needs housing allowances?

Ed Morrissey Jun 27, 2017 8:41 PM

“There are dozens upon dozens of members living in their offices, and I don’t know how healthy that is long term.”

“This isn’t going to get a lot cheaper, it can’t, it won’t.”

“…what we failed to achieve with votes, we would do with weapons.”

“[S]o dumb it’s amazing we even have to have the conversation.”

“It was not necessary.”

“You’re inflaming everyone right here right now with those words!”

“Trump’s people said, ‘We’ll be writing the speech that the President’s Audio-Animatronic figure will be saying.'”

Excuses, excuses.

Not really a “kill all the lawyers” scenario

4 pm ET!

“it has not taken serious steps to end its own complicity in trafficking, including forced laborers from North Korea.”