Green Room

WaPo: White House tipped to UK’s plan to detain Greenwald partner

posted at 3:17 pm on August 19, 2013 by

According to the Washington Post, the White House got advance knowledge of the UK’s plan to detain Glenn Greenwald’s partner under an anti-terrorism law.  The White House says that the Obama administration didn’t request the stop, but it apparently didn’t object to it either:

British authorities gave U.S. officials advance notice that they planned to detain the Brazilian partner of journalist Glenn Greenwald, who worked with leaker Edward Snowden to expose details of the National Security Agency’s surveillance programs.

The White House received a “heads up” that London police would detain David Miranda on Sunday at Heathrow Airport, White House spokesman Josh Earnest told reporters Monday. He added that the U.S. government did not request Miranda’s detention, calling it “a law enforcement action” taken by the British government.

“This was a decision that was made by the British government without the involvement and not at the request of the United States government,” Earnest said. “It’s as simple as that.”

Pressed repeatedly on the matter, Earnest would not condemn the nine-hour detention of Miranda, nor did he say whether British authorities shared with the United States any intelligence they might have extracted from him.

The Cameron government is getting slammed across the political spectrum at home for using an anti-terrorism law against a “suspect” which it acknowledges presented no risk of terrorism.  Will the White House involvement in the stop raise similar questions here?

Recently in the Green Room:

Blowback

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

But really, there’s no need to fear the police state. Freedom of the press and free speech will always be with us.

Just ask James Rosen.

Chris of Rights on August 19, 2013 at 3:55 PM

Why does Obama want gay couples to be persecuted?

trs on August 19, 2013 at 4:02 PM

Why the hell do we know this within 24 hours of the event …

gh on August 19, 2013 at 5:25 PM

The Cameron government is getting slammed across the political spectrum at home for using an anti-terrorism law against a “suspect” which it acknowledges presented no risk of terrorism. Will the White House involvement in the stop raise similar questions here?

Sound of gut-busting laughter coming from MSM-watchers all over America!

I’m sure CNN-CBS-ABC-NBC-MSNBC-WAPO-NYT-HUFFPO-LAT will be all over this story by nightfall, and sustained howls of outrage will be directed at the White House generally and the President himself any minute now.

Sacramento on August 19, 2013 at 6:32 PM


HotAir — Politics, Culture, Media, 2017, Breaking News from a conservative viewpoint
Top Pick

Noor lawyers up — for good reason.

Still losing ground.

Still an unusual choice

Lone Star blues

“…held in full view — but not listening distance — of others present.”

“In 1977, Chesimard was found guilty of first degree murder…”

“Shep is a friend, I like him, but he’s so anti-Trump.”

Pony up some additional cash, citizens

“She’s absolutely going to run.”

“‘Let’s fix it’ are the magic words.”

Growing fears of the war(s) to come

Jazz Shaw Jul 18, 2017 4:01 PM

Just because you’re paranoid doesn’t mean they’re not out to get ya

“it looked like the White House was going to tell Congress it could not certify Iran was complying”

Donald Trump just put Venezuela on notice

Jazz Shaw Jul 18, 2017 2:01 PM

Smack down

“…it seems that speech — at least certain types of speech — can be a form of violence.”

Aesthetics and optics.

Never an attractive option

“I did not come to Washington to hurt people.”

Third time’s the charm?

Why on Earth would I do that?

Police, experts, and Twin Cities wonder.

Conflict of lethal interests

Hello, AHCA?

“We will never stop fighting the violent left on the battlefield of truth.”

“He talks to us. He’s talking to ‘We the People.'”

Self-order kiosks coming to some Subway locations

John Sexton Jul 17, 2017 9:21 PM

“…a growing feature in more quick-service and fast-casual restaurants.”

Kurds: “We believe 99%” ISIS leader still alive

Ed Morrissey Jul 17, 2017 8:41 PM

Not in Mosul … or in Raqqa either?

The jobs Americans won’t do.

“A police spokesman said on Monday that the violence against officers was ‘horrifying’…”

Acid flashback?

Perhaps not a miracle, but still good news

“…there was a lot of pressure from them and their friends for Gretchen to change what she was saying.”