Green Room

US military assistance to Syrian rebels: Small arms, CIA training

posted at 11:56 am on June 15, 2013 by

But perhaps nothing armor-piercing, according to Fox News:

The United States will supply Syrian rebels with weapons through a CIA-run program, FoxNews confirmed Saturday.

President Obama decided Thursday to supply rebel forces with small arms and ammunition, following confirmation that the regime of Syria President Bashar al-Assad’s has been using chemical weapons in the 2-year-long civil war in which at least 90,000 people have been killed.

In addition to supplying the weapons, the CIA will train rebel forces, Fox News also confirmed.

Obama vowed last summer to take action should the Assad cross a “red line” by using chemical weapons but has been challenged in verifying whether his forces used chemical weapons and in determining which rebel forces can be trusted.

However, the rebels being supplied with only small arms has disappointed some Capitol Hill lawmakers and other Americas who want a more robust response and who say the administration’s actions might be too little, too late as Assad forces appear to be taking control of the war.

That won’t satisfy John McCain, who wanted to go the full Charlie Wilson and give the rebels anti-aircraft missiles as well as weapons to go after heavy mechanized forces on the ground.  The White House seems mindful of the fact that (a) the rebels are mainly Sunni Islamist extremists, and (b) the obvious secondary target for those missiles would be anything flying out of Tel Aviv.

On the other hand, it’s difficult to see how the small arms will do much against larger formations of the Syrian army and even Hezbollah, but it will keep partisan-style warfare in play.  That would prolong the conflict and put more pressure on Assad and the rebels to make concessions in peace talks.  The Obama administration says that’s their goal, and this seems consistent with the stated mission — and wisely limited, given the choices.

Recently in the Green Room:



Trackback URL


What could go wrong when arming Islamist militants who scream “Allah Akbar” when they’re in the act of killing people… wait, actually that’s EVERY video on the internet when Muslims are killing people. Seriously, show me one video online where Muslims are killing people and they’re NOT screaming “Allah Akbar”.

Yakko77 on June 15, 2013 at 12:02 PM

Is this “small arms and training” programme similar to the 1980s programme in Afghanistan that spawned Mr Bin Laden?

YiZhangZhe on June 15, 2013 at 5:34 PM

US military assistance to Syrian rebels: Small arms, CIA training

So they can now tap into our phone records and conduct raids on Tea Party groups?

Steve Eggleston on June 15, 2013 at 6:27 PM

I suppose the odd students will turn on their CIA trainers. Small price to please the Saudis. Maybe Jeb and Hillary will get that campaign money after all.

[email protected] on June 15, 2013 at 7:51 PM

I suppose if they are going into Syria using CIA hands, and probably civvie contract personnel, makes sense. Deniability. But this is the exact mission that is tasked to the Green Berets. It’s been their mission since JFK awarded the beret back in 62.They would seem more qualified not only to train but to provide leadership and a sense of discipline and order.

xkaydet65 on June 15, 2013 at 8:54 PM

Does it make any sense to do this, now that the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood will be backing the so called rebels ?

BillyPenn on June 15, 2013 at 10:37 PM

Should have been done years ago, before 30,000 Syrians were murdered…quietly toppling Assad.

However, that said…there was a time when covert action was well, sorta covert. We did a number of good things back in the day and it never hit the front page, not even page 28, below the fold, unless somebody screwed up.

Why is this Administration broadcasting that we are involved in “covert” stuff…or that CIA is out there doing stuff?

Iran is sending over 4000 “fighters” to Syria….bet a bunch are going to be detailed to hunt down Americans…in Syria, in Turkey and in Jordan.

All of this could have been avoided years ago…quietly…without fanfare, without spiking the ball, had we a CinC who actually understood the real world as it is, not as he (and his dad) dreamed it should be…

American blood will be shed…too much…for what???

To make Obama look good? Improve his polling?

coldwarrior on June 16, 2013 at 7:32 AM

ANY “engagement” that America has in Syria is downright obscene.

WaPo – June 15, 2013
“The CIA is preparing to deliver arms to rebel groups in Syria through clandestine bases in Turkey and Jordan that were expanded over the past year …”

It’s none of our business. PERIOD! Obviously, Emperor Øligula is bound and determined to assist terrorists. The “rebels” have pledged allegiance to al Qaeda and the American people allow this?
What an utter disgrace. As for the brain-addled Johnny Mac, he can go to Hades and take Øligula with him.

Karl Magnus on June 16, 2013 at 11:52 AM

Personally, since 7 of the 9 major groups supporting the rebels are terrorist or terrorist-affiliated I think we are backing the wrong side. Any armaments given them will wind up in Al Qaeda’s hands if the rebels are successful. Should Assad win anyway, then he gets the weapons. In any event it’s lose-lose. Why are we getting involved???? Are we crazy or is it an Obama ploy- playing wag the dog to divert attention from scandals?

What is the CIA going to teach the rebels? How to eavesdrop on Americans like the FBI, NSA and IRS? That’ll come in handy when Al Qaeda takes over.

MaiDee on June 17, 2013 at 1:02 AM

Obama …..Amateur.
Aren’t CIA trainers “boots on the ground?”

Art on June 17, 2013 at 6:35 AM

HotAir — Politics, Culture, Media, 2017, Breaking News from a conservative viewpoint

Fixing crime in America is a complicated issue

Taylor Millard Jun 23, 2017 8:31 PM
Top Pick

Cops alone won’t solve it.

Top Pick

Victim’s father was President Maduro’s supervisor back when he was a bus driver.

Democrats forgot all about the “era of good feelings”

“Bernie and Jane Sanders have lawyered up.”

“the Judiciary Committee is examining the circumstances surrounding the removal of James Comey.”

Winning isn’t everything. It is the only thing

Trump signs VA reform bill into law

John Sexton Jun 23, 2017 2:41 PM

“What happened was a national disgrace, and yet some of the employees involved in these scandals remained on the payrolls.”

A new era of something.

“…died suddenly in less than a week just after his return to the U.S.”

The shortsightedness of “Denounce and Preserve”

Taylor Millard Jun 23, 2017 12:11 PM

Pragmatism for the sake of pragmatism doesn’t always work.

Perhaps if you threw in a new car?

Gay marriages still growing, but not as fast

Andrew Malcolm Jun 23, 2017 10:31 AM

More, but not as quickly.

Should’ve stuck with the pirate gig. It was working for him

The battle for the rubble of Raqqa is underway

Andrew Malcolm Jun 23, 2017 8:51 AM

Won’t be much left.

Your list of demands is a publicity stunt

“what happened that day was emblematic of a deeply troubling trend among progressives…”

“The jobs are still leaving. Nothing has stopped.”

Bad vendor. Bad! No cookie!

“The Corps is just starting to grapple with the issues the court has identified.”

“So you want me to sing my praises, is that what you’re saying?”

Why would we possibly want that?

“I mean he sold our country to The Russians.”

I could think of someone else you might want to ask about…

“You can ask a hundred people what hate speech is and you get a thousand different answers”

Trump: I never made any recordings of Comey

Allahpundit Jun 22, 2017 2:01 PM


Hackers stole private data from election databases

John Sexton Jun 22, 2017 1:21 PM

“90,000 records stolen by Russian state actors contained drivers license numbers”

Failure to protect the city

Big man on the Middle Eastern campus

Biased Americans see media as biased.

Tough times down on the liberal ranch

Will Nancy Pelosi survive this latest Dem disaster?

Andrew Malcolm Jun 22, 2017 8:41 AM

Eat quick, before it’s gone.

Slow your roll, boss

“I’m bothered by the lack of emerging evidence…”

FIrst look at the Senate health bill

John Sexton Jun 21, 2017 9:21 PM

“the Senate bill would go farther than the House version in its approach to cutting Medicaid spending.”

Divide and conquer?