Green Room

No labels: AP style book bans “illegal immigrant”

posted at 3:26 pm on April 2, 2013 by

Today’s the second of the month, so this isn’t an April Fools joke:

The Associated Press, the largest news-gathering outlet in the world, will no longer use the term “illegal immigrant.” The news came in the form of a blog entry authored by Senior Vice President and Executive Editor Kathleen Carroll on Tuesday afternoon, explaining that the decision is part of the company’s on-going attempt to rid their Stylebook of labels. “The Stylebook no longer sanctions the term ‘illegal immigrant’ or the use of ‘illegal’ to describe a person. Instead, it tells users that ‘illegal’ should describe only an action, such as living in or immigrating to a country illegally,” Carroll wrote. The company’s decision comes after years of controversy over the term. Fusion, the ABC-Univision joint venture, does not use “illegal immigrant” because we believe it dehumanizes those it describes and we find it to be linguistically inaccurate.

In case you’re curious, “undocumented immigrant” is also verboten, which leaves…what, exactly?  AP pro-tip: Why use two words when 17 will suffice?

Exit questions (Allahpundit ™):  How should enlightened journos refer to illegal immigrants persons-who-have-migrated-to-the-United-States-in-violation-of-one-or-more-statutes-but-whose-humanity-we-fully-affirm from now on?  And what other terms should get the axe, based on this standard?  Does active engagement in terrorism make someone a “terrorist”, really?  That’s such a judgmental word.  What about “criminals”?  “Persons convicted of unlawful acts” sounds less harsh.   Have at it, folks.

Recently in the Green Room:



Trackback URL


Maybe the AP will start calling them “undocumented citizens” like Rand Paul does.

Mark1971 on April 2, 2013 at 3:33 PM

Will they continue to label those who oppose amnesty, “anti-immigrant” or “anti-immigration?”

Fezzik on April 2, 2013 at 3:39 PM

OK. How about using this term:

Foreign Invaders

wren on April 2, 2013 at 3:46 PM

‘illegal’ should describe only an action, such as living in or immigrating to a country illegally,”

Isn’t that what we are doing when we use the words “illegal immigrant”? Of course it is. And you bolded this part, which is the heart of it. The implication seems to be they really don’t mean what their policy says, and are just banning the terms entirely. Probably you’re right, but the cognitive dissonance is blatant.

Fenris on April 2, 2013 at 3:50 PM

Those Ent names will keep Sauron on his toes, lest he risk exposing himself as a boorish rube for elves to heap mockery upon.

derit on April 2, 2013 at 4:02 PM

So, it’s acceptable to the AP to write “immigrated illegally,” but not “illegal immigrant”?

Does this also mean that, by extension, the term “legal immigrant” is banned?

steebo77 on April 2, 2013 at 4:03 PM

Un-invited Guests?

JusDreamin on April 2, 2013 at 4:07 PM

$50 on “undetermined citizenship”.

Xavier on April 2, 2013 at 5:32 PM

“Illegal immigrant” is out. So is “undocumented”?

Are they going back to “wetback”?

krome on April 2, 2013 at 5:47 PM

Mentally challenged Liberals actually think they can solve real problems by outlawing the words which describe them!!!

What maroons!! …and their alien invader friends, too!!!

Next: To rescue the economy, Liberals will ban the word “unemployed”!!!

landlines on April 2, 2013 at 6:08 PM

Next: To rescue the economy, Liberals will ban the word “unemployed”!!!

landlines on April 2, 2013 at 6:08 PM

Absolutely…many libtards don’t say that they are currently unemployed anyways, but that they are ‘between jobs’ :)…it always cracks me up…

jimver on April 2, 2013 at 7:21 PM

AP pro-tip: Why use two words when 17 will suffice?

Is this is a decision by people who get paid by the word? Are these the same folks who nodded sagely when the Obama admin reclassified war as time limited military kinetic action?

Do these people know that Orwell’s work was meant to be a warning, not an instruction manual?

CitizenEgg on April 3, 2013 at 10:12 AM

I am confused.

That is all…..

nchammer on April 3, 2013 at 12:06 PM

Good, I much prefer Criminal Alien or Alien Invader, to illegal Immigrant.

Bulletchaser on April 3, 2013 at 12:20 PM

LOL Or as Jay Leno (or Jay Leno’s joke writer) calls them: undocumented Democrats.

cynccook on April 3, 2013 at 12:40 PM

Okay let’s use Illegally an Immigrant, or resident Illegally?

JohnFLob on April 3, 2013 at 12:53 PM

I think it’d be wise at this rate to refer to Associated Press (“AP”) as Assanine Pantywaist, that way they can keep the “AP” but be admitting by using it that they’re an organization of fools.

Lourdes on April 3, 2013 at 2:26 PM

HotAir — Politics, Culture, Media, 2017, Breaking News from a conservative viewpoint
Top Pick


“Felix was out on bond after threatening another public servant and has a history of making threats.”

Chaffetz: House needs housing allowances?

Ed Morrissey Jun 27, 2017 8:41 PM

“There are dozens upon dozens of members living in their offices, and I don’t know how healthy that is long term.”

“This isn’t going to get a lot cheaper, it can’t, it won’t.”

“…what we failed to achieve with votes, we would do with weapons.”

“[S]o dumb it’s amazing we even have to have the conversation.”

“It was not necessary.”

“You’re inflaming everyone right here right now with those words!”

“Trump’s people said, ‘We’ll be writing the speech that the President’s Audio-Animatronic figure will be saying.'”

Excuses, excuses.

Not really a “kill all the lawyers” scenario

4 pm ET!

“it has not taken serious steps to end its own complicity in trafficking, including forced laborers from North Korea.”

Currently doing a search for “good international trade lawyers”

Ransomware attack spreads through Europe

John Sexton Jun 27, 2017 1:01 PM

“A massive ransomware campaign is currently unfolding worldwide.”

At least their address rarely changes

It just keeps on happening

“Trump is good for business right now.”

Start spreading the news…

“Now it’s time for the next step.”

A “cryptic” warning to Bashar al-Assad?

Jazz Shaw Jun 27, 2017 8:01 AM

The three strikes rule may be in effect

CNN reporters resign over retracted story

John Sexton Jun 26, 2017 9:21 PM

“The individuals all stated that they accepted responsibility and wanted to resign.”

Federalism’s greatest champion is now …

Ed Morrissey Jun 26, 2017 8:41 PM

“In the end, we’re a democracy.”

“Almost all controversial speech harms people, upsets or offends them…”

Obama: Back home again in Indonesia

Andrew Malcolm Jun 26, 2017 7:21 PM

The call to prayer and eating dog.

Testing the waters.

“primarily because the penalty for not having insurance would be eliminated.”

“If I were a Seattle lawmaker, I would be thinking hard about the $15 an hour phase-in.”

Days of future past

“Not only are taxpayers footing the bill, but people are dying unnecessarily because of this.”

Israel settles who can stand where at the Western Wall

Andrew Malcolm Jun 26, 2017 3:21 PM

Women to the right, men to the left.

Look on the bright side. There’s less snow in the summer

Big win … but for how long?

“Several Russian cities have unveiled monuments to Stalin in recent months.”

Massive disappointment