Green Room

Shirtless judge admits to affair with woman in chambers

posted at 11:04 am on March 30, 2013 by

Say, remember Judge Wade McCree? Almost a year ago, he made the news when a husband found his shirtless picture on his wife’s cell phone.  Now NBC reports that McCree has admitted in an investigation that he had sex with a woman in his chambers while hearing her child-custody case — and launched another child-custody issue by doing so:

Visit NBCNews.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Raise your hand if you’re shocked, shocked that McCree isn’t a model of discretion and decorum.

Recently in the Green Room:

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

And judges are the folks who are going to ultimately decide the gay marriage issue for us. Just great.

gryphon202 on March 30, 2013 at 11:07 AM

I’m working on a case right now where opposing counsel started an affair with the mother of the kid, denied it, and the judge chose to believe her. Amazingly enough, WA state has a Bar rule prohibiting attorneys from having sex with their clients unless the sex came first.

And she goes to court and claims she incurs attorney fees. The judge gives them to her. So our guy has to pay for sex he doesn’t even get. So, no I’m not surprised at this black robed slut. I am surprised that he admitted it.

platypus on March 30, 2013 at 11:12 AM

That is not an affair

That is a quickie

oldernwiser on March 30, 2013 at 11:24 AM

I am relieved to hear the affair had no bearing on his decision in this case.
/

STL_Vet on March 30, 2013 at 11:39 AM

You got it all wrong. She was performing her public service.

BobMbx on March 30, 2013 at 11:46 AM

platypus on March 30, 2013 at 11:12 AM

What’s in the water up there? I remember when some guy on trial for multiple murder was caught schtupping his married public defender in the interview room. Sheesh!

Blake on March 30, 2013 at 11:50 AM

Kind of like the conflict of interest of the Judge that struck down California’s Prop 8.

Count to 10 on March 30, 2013 at 12:58 PM

Discretion and decorum? How about just flat out stupid, with carte blanche to ruin peoples’ lives?

Cindy Munford on March 30, 2013 at 4:05 PM

Okay, I’m going nuts. I swear I made a comment here.

Cindy Munford on March 30, 2013 at 4:16 PM

And there it is, 11 minutes later. So weird.

Cindy Munford on March 30, 2013 at 4:17 PM

But did the judge rule in her favor???

redguy on March 30, 2013 at 4:30 PM

About damned time a family court judge F^cked a woman! They have been screwing men for decades now.

astonerii on March 30, 2013 at 6:01 PM

astonerii on March 30, 2013 at 6:01 PM

LOL! I have to admit that this is a surprise from you. Not the view but the wording.

Cindy Munford on March 30, 2013 at 6:40 PM

There was a judge in Penn. who would offer female defendants a reduction in their sentence if they allowed him to wash their hair.

Then there was the judge in Orange County, who use to look at child porn on his court computer.

Blake on March 30, 2013 at 6:41 PM

LOL! I have to admit that this is a surprise from you. Not the view but the wording.

Cindy Munford on March 30, 2013 at 6:40 PM

I just cannot believe it was not the first post… It was why I came to look at this post, to see someone say it.

astonerii on March 30, 2013 at 6:56 PM

“the back entrance”. I bet.

SouthernGent on March 31, 2013 at 12:08 PM

She was performing her public service.

BobMbx on March 30, 2013 at 11:46 AM

I think you got one too many “L” in there.

Meanwhile: Goofy bow tie, suspenders. Women go for this kinda thing? I have so been doing things wrong. Never thought I’d see the day I’d consider consulting a cirucs clown for a make over.

apostic on March 31, 2013 at 1:51 PM

… uninhibited access …

.
LOL !!! Da judge sho did have uninhibited access in da courthouse!
Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha

ExpressoBold on March 31, 2013 at 4:03 PM

Kinda calls all his past cases in to question…

RalphyBoy on March 31, 2013 at 5:19 PM

Kinda calls all his past cases in to question…

RalphyBoy on March 31, 2013 at 5:19 PM

It is a family court, almost every single case for the last 40 years has been questionable.

astonerii on March 31, 2013 at 7:01 PM

Tell me again why we’re required to address them as “Your Honor”

bluesdoc70 on March 31, 2013 at 9:39 PM

jurist imprudence. Ideal for the obama justice department.

StevC on April 1, 2013 at 10:43 AM