Green Room

Shirtless judge admits to affair with woman in chambers

posted at 11:04 am on March 30, 2013 by

Say, remember Judge Wade McCree? Almost a year ago, he made the news when a husband found his shirtless picture on his wife’s cell phone.  Now NBC reports that McCree has admitted in an investigation that he had sex with a woman in his chambers while hearing her child-custody case — and launched another child-custody issue by doing so:

Visit NBCNews.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Raise your hand if you’re shocked, shocked that McCree isn’t a model of discretion and decorum.

Recently in the Green Room:

Blowback

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

And judges are the folks who are going to ultimately decide the gay marriage issue for us. Just great.

gryphon202 on March 30, 2013 at 11:07 AM

I’m working on a case right now where opposing counsel started an affair with the mother of the kid, denied it, and the judge chose to believe her. Amazingly enough, WA state has a Bar rule prohibiting attorneys from having sex with their clients unless the sex came first.

And she goes to court and claims she incurs attorney fees. The judge gives them to her. So our guy has to pay for sex he doesn’t even get. So, no I’m not surprised at this black robed slut. I am surprised that he admitted it.

platypus on March 30, 2013 at 11:12 AM

That is not an affair

That is a quickie

oldernwiser on March 30, 2013 at 11:24 AM

I am relieved to hear the affair had no bearing on his decision in this case.
/

STL_Vet on March 30, 2013 at 11:39 AM

You got it all wrong. She was performing her public service.

BobMbx on March 30, 2013 at 11:46 AM

platypus on March 30, 2013 at 11:12 AM

What’s in the water up there? I remember when some guy on trial for multiple murder was caught schtupping his married public defender in the interview room. Sheesh!

Blake on March 30, 2013 at 11:50 AM

Kind of like the conflict of interest of the Judge that struck down California’s Prop 8.

Count to 10 on March 30, 2013 at 12:58 PM

Discretion and decorum? How about just flat out stupid, with carte blanche to ruin peoples’ lives?

Cindy Munford on March 30, 2013 at 4:05 PM

Okay, I’m going nuts. I swear I made a comment here.

Cindy Munford on March 30, 2013 at 4:16 PM

And there it is, 11 minutes later. So weird.

Cindy Munford on March 30, 2013 at 4:17 PM

But did the judge rule in her favor???

redguy on March 30, 2013 at 4:30 PM

About damned time a family court judge F^cked a woman! They have been screwing men for decades now.

astonerii on March 30, 2013 at 6:01 PM

astonerii on March 30, 2013 at 6:01 PM

LOL! I have to admit that this is a surprise from you. Not the view but the wording.

Cindy Munford on March 30, 2013 at 6:40 PM

There was a judge in Penn. who would offer female defendants a reduction in their sentence if they allowed him to wash their hair.

Then there was the judge in Orange County, who use to look at child porn on his court computer.

Blake on March 30, 2013 at 6:41 PM

LOL! I have to admit that this is a surprise from you. Not the view but the wording.

Cindy Munford on March 30, 2013 at 6:40 PM

I just cannot believe it was not the first post… It was why I came to look at this post, to see someone say it.

astonerii on March 30, 2013 at 6:56 PM

“the back entrance”. I bet.

SouthernGent on March 31, 2013 at 12:08 PM

She was performing her public service.

BobMbx on March 30, 2013 at 11:46 AM

I think you got one too many “L” in there.

Meanwhile: Goofy bow tie, suspenders. Women go for this kinda thing? I have so been doing things wrong. Never thought I’d see the day I’d consider consulting a cirucs clown for a make over.

apostic on March 31, 2013 at 1:51 PM

… uninhibited access …

.
LOL !!! Da judge sho did have uninhibited access in da courthouse!
Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha

ExpressoBold on March 31, 2013 at 4:03 PM

Kinda calls all his past cases in to question…

RalphyBoy on March 31, 2013 at 5:19 PM

Kinda calls all his past cases in to question…

RalphyBoy on March 31, 2013 at 5:19 PM

It is a family court, almost every single case for the last 40 years has been questionable.

astonerii on March 31, 2013 at 7:01 PM

Tell me again why we’re required to address them as “Your Honor”

bluesdoc70 on March 31, 2013 at 9:39 PM

jurist imprudence. Ideal for the obama justice department.

StevC on April 1, 2013 at 10:43 AM


HotAir — Politics, Culture, Media, 2017, Breaking News from a conservative viewpoint
Top Pick

Will they stay or will they go?

Top Pick

I can’t imagine what I was thinking when I said that

Rocking the boat majorly

Big government never contracts. It only grows more powerful

It’s only a “ban” until it becomes inconvenient

The decline and fall of Obamacare and the AHCA

Jazz Shaw Jun 24, 2017 8:31 AM

This was all over before it began

Fixing crime in America is a complicated issue

Taylor Millard Jun 23, 2017 8:31 PM

Cops alone won’t solve it.

Victim’s father was President Maduro’s supervisor back when he was a bus driver.

Democrats forgot all about the “era of good feelings”

“Bernie and Jane Sanders have lawyered up.”

“the Judiciary Committee is examining the circumstances surrounding the removal of James Comey.”

Winning isn’t everything. It is the only thing

Trump signs VA reform bill into law

John Sexton Jun 23, 2017 2:41 PM

“What happened was a national disgrace, and yet some of the employees involved in these scandals remained on the payrolls.”

A new era of something.

“…died suddenly in less than a week just after his return to the U.S.”

The shortsightedness of “Denounce and Preserve”

Taylor Millard Jun 23, 2017 12:11 PM

Pragmatism for the sake of pragmatism doesn’t always work.

Perhaps if you threw in a new car?

Gay marriages still growing, but not as fast

Andrew Malcolm Jun 23, 2017 10:31 AM

More, but not as quickly.

Should’ve stuck with the pirate gig. It was working for him

The battle for the rubble of Raqqa is underway

Andrew Malcolm Jun 23, 2017 8:51 AM

Won’t be much left.

Your list of demands is a publicity stunt

“what happened that day was emblematic of a deeply troubling trend among progressives…”

“The jobs are still leaving. Nothing has stopped.”

Bad vendor. Bad! No cookie!

“The Corps is just starting to grapple with the issues the court has identified.”

“So you want me to sing my praises, is that what you’re saying?”

Why would we possibly want that?

“I mean he sold our country to The Russians.”

I could think of someone else you might want to ask about…

“You can ask a hundred people what hate speech is and you get a thousand different answers”

Trump: I never made any recordings of Comey

Allahpundit Jun 22, 2017 2:01 PM

Bluff.

Hackers stole private data from election databases

John Sexton Jun 22, 2017 1:21 PM

“90,000 records stolen by Russian state actors contained drivers license numbers”

Failure to protect the city

Big man on the Middle Eastern campus