Comments on: Maybe we should define “progress”

By: gwelf

gwelf — Mon, 11 Feb 2013 18:55:34 +0000

I find it rather amazing that the Washington Post can decry the decline of feminism and in the same sentence complain that CBS wants to avoid having women displayed as sexual objects with their breasts and buttocks on display for entertainment. Talk about clueless irony ….

It’s not contradictory to the liberal feminists mind because they want a society where they are free to “be themselves” and act in any way they want without anyone judging them for it. They want to behave like sexual objects but blame you if you think they are a sexual object.

By: ProfShadow

ProfShadow — Mon, 11 Feb 2013 17:49:01 +0000

I thought we had dictionaries around that would help with that..even online ones, Suzi.

OH, like “focus” when Obama uses it….yeah…

Inigo Montoya on Obama’s use of the word “focus”

You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.

By: kemojr

kemojr — Mon, 11 Feb 2013 14:43:54 +0000

Obama thinks that taxing you and using the tax money to hire people to work for the government is job creation. Real job creation occurs when people start their own businesses and grow and hire more employees thereby increasing the tax base. Everyone wins. The employer gets rewarded for his investment of time and money, the employee gets a job and the govenrment gets more tax money due to the increased tax base. Socialist fools like Obama do not understand this simple truth and the country suffers because of it. Obama is alot more interested in his perverse socialist agenda that he is in the welfare his fellow citizens

By: GWB

GWB — Mon, 11 Feb 2013 14:35:03 +0000

where music royalty gather to honor talent

See, there's our first problem. No, they aren't royalty. I know many folks might speak hyperbolically about that, but I somehow doubt it was hyperbolic from this woman.

By: The Schaef

The Schaef — Mon, 11 Feb 2013 14:22:10 +0000

Let us redefine progress to mean that just because we can do a thing, it does not necessarily mean we must do that thing.

By: bflat879

bflat879 — Sun, 10 Feb 2013 21:51:58 +0000

I’m really glad to see someone call out the feminist. They’re the ones who allowed this “War on Women” to be run by the Democrats, they’re the ones who had no problem with Clinton and Lewinsky, and they’re the ones who only have problems with bias when they can blame it on Conservatives.

Having raised 3 daughters, I never realized I should have told them to only complain about unfair treatment if it was from a Republican and let the Democrats do what they want.

By: listens2glenn

listens2glenn — Sun, 10 Feb 2013 19:33:25 +0000

Before you can define “progress”, you must FIRST define “normal”.

The entire spectrum of ALL political debate boils down to an argument over “defining normal.”

Conclusion:

There’s never going to be an agreement over the definition of “normal” or “progress”, until Jesus returns.

Period.

By: redguy

redguy — Sun, 10 Feb 2013 19:25:51 +0000

Why bother watching if we can’t see a nip slip?????

By: FlareCorran

FlareCorran — Sun, 10 Feb 2013 19:02:10 +0000

“Progress means getting nearer to the place you want to be. And if you have taken a wrong turning, then to go forward does not get you any nearer.
If you are on the wrong road, progress means doing an about-turn and walking back to the right road; and in that case the man who turns back soonest is the most progressive man.”

C.S. Lewis

By: Stoic Patriot

Stoic Patriot — Sun, 10 Feb 2013 18:53:21 +0000

So WaPo is offended that awards shows aren’t giant porn flicks? Er, ooooookkaaaayyyy…

By: teejk

teejk — Sun, 10 Feb 2013 17:17:09 +0000

Not that I would watch the Grammies but I’m afraid this policy will spill over to other shows. I always justified my cable bill as being part “cover charge”.

you know I’m just joking.

By: iurockhead

iurockhead — Sun, 10 Feb 2013 17:11:38 +0000

Please be sure that buttocks and female breasts are adequately covered.

So, what, moobs are OK? I'm confused.

By: Amendment X

Amendment X — Sun, 10 Feb 2013 17:07:05 +0000

Glad they have their priorities in order: No side views of boobs, no stories on Benghazi, et al