Green Room

Maybe we should define “progress”

posted at 11:59 am on February 10, 2013 by

Suzi Parker at the Washington Post seems worried that the new dress code from CBS for Grammy Awards attendees is a sign of regression:

Is this country regressing instead of progressing?

The war on women is raging, feminism is a dirty word and skimpy clothes on stars is a no-no, even in the world of rock and roll.

Tonight, CBS hosts the 55th annual Grammy Awards where music royalty gather to honor talent in an array of  genres including jazz, country, rock and even classical. It’s a starry, sparkly event, the music business’ equivalent to the Academy Awards, where musicians strut on the red carpet in outrageous outfits.

But maybe not this year.

CBS has issued a “wardrobe advisory” for tonight’s show. It reportedly states, “Please be sure that buttocks and female breasts are adequately covered. Thong type costumes are problematic. Please avoid exposing bare fleshy under curves of the buttocks and buttock crack. Bare sides or under curvature of the breasts is also problematic.”

See-through clothing that could “possibly expose female breast nipples” is also banned. And then there’s this: “Please be sure the genital region is adequately covered so that there is no visible ‘puffy’ bare skin exposure.” As if any worthy rock star has an ounce of puffy anywhere on his or her body.

The “war on women” is a myth, feminism sold out during the Monica Lewinsky affair, and skimpy clothes are fine on the beach or in similar social circumstances.  If we’re defining progress by how acceptable it is at formal affairs to expose nipples and show off “side boob,” then I’d say that we’re regressing as a society to on that basis rather than progressing toward maturity.

I find it rather amazing that the Washington Post can decry the decline of feminism and in the same sentence complain that CBS wants to avoid having women displayed as sexual objects with their breasts and buttocks on display for entertainment.  Talk about clueless irony ….

Recently in the Green Room:



Trackback URL


Glad they have their priorities in order: No side views of boobs, no stories on Benghazi, et al

Amendment X on February 10, 2013 at 12:07 PM

Please be sure that buttocks and female breasts are adequately covered.

So, what, moobs are OK?

I’m confused.

iurockhead on February 10, 2013 at 12:11 PM

Not that I would watch the Grammies but I’m afraid this policy will spill over to other shows. I always justified my cable bill as being part “cover charge”.

you know I’m just joking.

teejk on February 10, 2013 at 12:17 PM

So WaPo is offended that awards shows aren’t giant porn flicks? Er, ooooookkaaaayyyy…

Stoic Patriot on February 10, 2013 at 1:53 PM

“Progress means getting nearer to the place you want to be. And if you have taken a wrong turning, then to go forward does not get you any nearer.
If you are on the wrong road, progress means doing an about-turn and walking back to the right road; and in that case the man who turns back soonest is the most progressive man.”

C.S. Lewis

FlareCorran on February 10, 2013 at 2:02 PM

Why bother watching if we can’t see a nip slip?????

redguy on February 10, 2013 at 2:25 PM

Before you can define “progress”, you must FIRST define “normal”.

The entire spectrum of ALL political debate boils down to an argument over “defining normal.”


There’s never going to be an agreement over the definition of “normal” or “progress”, until Jesus returns.


listens2glenn on February 10, 2013 at 2:33 PM

I’m really glad to see someone call out the feminist. They’re the ones who allowed this “War on Women” to be run by the Democrats, they’re the ones who had no problem with Clinton and Lewinsky, and they’re the ones who only have problems with bias when they can blame it on Conservatives.

Having raised 3 daughters, I never realized I should have told them to only complain about unfair treatment if it was from a Republican and let the Democrats do what they want.

bflat879 on February 10, 2013 at 4:51 PM

where music royalty gather to honor talent

See, there’s our first problem. No, they aren’t royalty. I know many folks might speak hyperbolically about that, but I somehow doubt it was hyperbolic from this woman.

GWB on February 11, 2013 at 9:35 AM

Obama thinks that taxing you and using the tax money to hire people to work for the government is job creation. Real job creation occurs when people start their own businesses and grow and hire more employees thereby increasing the tax base. Everyone wins. The employer gets rewarded for his investment of time and money, the employee gets a job and the govenrment gets more tax money due to the increased tax base. Socialist fools like Obama do not understand this simple truth and the country suffers because of it. Obama is alot more interested in his perverse socialist agenda that he is in the welfare his fellow citizens

kemojr on February 11, 2013 at 9:43 AM

I thought we had dictionaries around that would help with that..even online ones, Suzi.

OH, like “focus” when Obama uses it….yeah…

Inigo Montoya on Obama’s use of the word “focus”

You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.

ProfShadow on February 11, 2013 at 12:49 PM

I find it rather amazing that the Washington Post can decry the decline of feminism and in the same sentence complain that CBS wants to avoid having women displayed as sexual objects with their breasts and buttocks on display for entertainment. Talk about clueless irony ….

It’s not contradictory to the liberal feminists mind because they want a society where they are free to “be themselves” and act in any way they want without anyone judging them for it. They want to behave like sexual objects but blame you if you think they are a sexual object.

gwelf on February 11, 2013 at 1:55 PM

HotAir — Politics, Culture, Media, 2017, Breaking News from a conservative viewpoint

Politico: Has the SPLC lost its way?

John Sexton Jun 28, 2017 3:01 PM
Top Pick

“The organization has always tried to find ways to milk money out of the public…”

Trump legal team backing away from Comey complaint?

Ed Morrissey Jun 28, 2017 2:31 PM
Top Pick


Time to get up and go to work, sir

CNN gets glum, defensive after resignations

John Sexton Jun 28, 2017 1:01 PM

“If Jeff lit himself on fire, it wouldn’t appease the pro-Trump media.”

Hmmm: FBI probing Russia-based anti-virus firm?

Ed Morrissey Jun 28, 2017 12:31 PM

“I wouldn’t put their stuff on my computer if you paid me.”

He works hard for the money…

It’s not a slippery slope. It’s a freaking avalanche.


Showdown: Sarah Palin vs the New York Times

Jazz Shaw Jun 28, 2017 9:21 AM


Credit where creditor’s due?

More flash than bang, but a very bad sign

“Felix was out on bond after threatening another public servant and has a history of making threats.”

Chaffetz: House needs housing allowances?

Ed Morrissey Jun 27, 2017 8:41 PM

“There are dozens upon dozens of members living in their offices, and I don’t know how healthy that is long term.”

“This isn’t going to get a lot cheaper, it can’t, it won’t.”

“…what we failed to achieve with votes, we would do with weapons.”

“[S]o dumb it’s amazing we even have to have the conversation.”

“It was not necessary.”

“You’re inflaming everyone right here right now with those words!”

“Trump’s people said, ‘We’ll be writing the speech that the President’s Audio-Animatronic figure will be saying.'”

Excuses, excuses.

Not really a “kill all the lawyers” scenario

4 pm ET!

“it has not taken serious steps to end its own complicity in trafficking, including forced laborers from North Korea.”

Currently doing a search for “good international trade lawyers”

Ransomware attack spreads through Europe

John Sexton Jun 27, 2017 1:01 PM

“A massive ransomware campaign is currently unfolding worldwide.”

At least their address rarely changes

It just keeps on happening

“Trump is good for business right now.”

Start spreading the news…

“Now it’s time for the next step.”

A “cryptic” warning to Bashar al-Assad?

Jazz Shaw Jun 27, 2017 8:01 AM

The three strikes rule may be in effect

CNN reporters resign over retracted story

John Sexton Jun 26, 2017 9:21 PM

“The individuals all stated that they accepted responsibility and wanted to resign.”