Green Room

Rand Paul More Troubled With Chuck Hagel Each Passing Day

posted at 6:27 pm on February 8, 2013 by

The key Kentucky Senator was interviewed by Hugh Hewitt Friday, and was asked about the revelation today by Breibart.com’s Ben Shapiro that the Defense secretary nominee received support from a group called Friends Of Hamas. Here’s the parts of that interview.

HH: Let me bring up one piece of information that Ben Shapiro at Breitbart put out today, which is one of the foreign funders behind Senator Hagel that he has not yet disclosed formally is something called Friends Of Hamas. If that is in fact true, Senator, would that lead you to vote against Mr. Hagel?

RP: You know, I saw that information today, also, and that is more and more concerning. With each day, there are new things coming out. So part of me wonders if the nomination continues to go on, and we’ll see how that goes. There are also either some organizations or corporations he’s been involved with that people, Ted Cruz in particular, has been asking are there any foreign contributors. And I think that is important. If you’re going to be in that high level a position in our government, we need to know if you have foreign sponsors, or have had foreign contributors. And I think that is pretty important, because people, that’s something that needs to be known.

HH: Well, let’s stay focused on Friends Of Hamas. Obviously, that would be a support group for a terrorist organization. Can you imagine voting or not filibustering anyone who’d received support from supporters of a terrorist organization?

RP: Like I say, it’s very troubling. And I’ve just seen the press report, so I’m going to have to look at what the response is, what the group is, and that kind of thing. But it is very concerning.

HH: Hamas – what is your opinion of Hamas?

RP: Well you know, I think that Hamas has shown itself not capable of sort of living in peace with Israel. They seem to foment a military reaction, and don’t seem to be able to live in peace with Israel. I do know that Israel did negotiate with them on one occasion for release of the solider, an Israeli soldier who’d been held there, and some say there are discussions between Hamas and Israel. I think that for there to be process for peace, there needs to be a more moderate type of Palestinian government in Gaza, I think, for the peace process to move forward.

HH: I believe Hamas is on our country’s list of terrorist organizations. Do you agree with that assessment?

RP: Yes.

HH: And so given that, I come back around to answering again, asking again, Senator Paul, I don’t know how Senator Hagel’s name can’t be withdrawn if he has received support from an organization, that’s a big if, but just assume that it is for a second, Shapiro a pretty good reporter, he’s got to pull his name. You can’t take money from a terrorist-supporting organization and come before the United States Senate and ask for a vote, can you?

RP: Yeah, I’m very troubled by it, and I think that’s what’s going to, we’re going to find out, is he’s going to have to respond to this. And you know, I think we’ll find out something in the next day or two.

- – - -

HH: Let me conclude by going one more time back to Secretary Hagel. Is it fair for me to conclude, tell the audience after you’re gone, that Chuck Hagel, in Rand Paul’s view, has to answer the question about whether or not he took money from Friends Of Hamas?

RP: Yes, that he has to, and I am going to wait and see what his answer is to that, and I’ve tried to keep an open mind on this. But I become more and more troubled with each day.

The nomination of Chuck Hagel, at this stage of the game, appears, it not Monty Python ex-parrot dead, at least Princess Bride mostly dead. There are clearly financial ties the former Nebraska Senator does not want to become public, because once disclosed, his nomination could no go forward. But Republicans are showing no signs of allowing the nomination to move forward until said financial disclosures, and any following questions that arise from them are answered.

And the collegiality principle that normally allows swift approval of appointees who are or were senators goes out the window in this case, because Hagel really wasn’t a likable guy on either side of the aisle.

Republicans so far haven’t let up on this, and they shouldn’t. We owe it to the republic to not passively approve someone so clearly demonstrating incompetence at best, and hostility at worst, towards the department he is nominated to run.

Recently in the Green Room:

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

I would not object to a filibuster on Hagel.

rbj on February 8, 2013 at 6:38 PM

Hagel really wasn’t a likable guy on either side of the aisle.

Maing him the perfect Obama appointee.

Bitter Clinger on February 8, 2013 at 6:53 PM

Can’t say that I blame the Buddha for having concerns. Hagel seems oddly disconnected from his surroundings.

Bmore on February 8, 2013 at 7:56 PM

Good. Up-chuck Hagel IS troubled.

MelonCollie on February 8, 2013 at 8:21 PM

You’ve heard of the Peter Principle? That we’re promoted or advance until we reach our level of incompetence?

Mr Hagel topped out with his paper route in Jr High.

countrybumpkin on February 8, 2013 at 8:30 PM

Man, these Senators on the right side of the aisle are deeply loathe to talk about even voting against a nominee, much less a filibuster of a nominee. Hugh had to horse-whip Senator Paul to get a condemnation of Hamas, fer cripes’ sakes.

Jaibones on February 9, 2013 at 1:40 PM

I don’t know what Friends of Hamas is. As Hillary might say, what difference does it make? If Hagel has accepted support of any kind from a group that is “friends” with a pack of murderous Islamists, any Democratic vote of support for Hagel from the likes of Schumer, Feinstein, Blumenthal, et al is the absolute epitome of hypocrisy.

Texlib on February 9, 2013 at 6:58 PM

Man, these Senators on the right side of the aisle are deeply loathe to talk about even voting against a nominee, much less a filibuster of a nominee. Hugh had to horse-whip Senator Paul to get a condemnation of Hamas, fer cripes’ sakes.

Jaibones on February 9, 2013 at 1:40 PM

Exactly.

Pretty sad. Even if the Friends of Hamas thing isnt’ true Hagel still has NO business being nominated.

He wants to cut both conventional AND nuclear weapons. He doesn’t think its fair for us to single out Iran or North Korea.

He’s against all sanctions on Iran.

He agreed with a caller to Al Jazeera who said America was a bully!

This shows what a sad state that we’re really in. That Rand Paul who had to be dragged into saying he had concerns instead of saying h@ll no…. that Rand Paul is one of the best we got as the other guys are all wimps and are much worse!

LevinFan on February 9, 2013 at 11:13 PM

They will all wail and wave their arms then politely get in line and support his nomination…the ruling class.

trs on February 10, 2013 at 3:26 PM