Green Room

Re: Manning and whistleblowing

posted at 5:52 pm on January 19, 2013 by

Jazz, I agree with your take on this absurd claim, but let me make another point in support.  There are, in fact, a few ways that a real whistleblower with a security clearance can alert people to violations of the law or abuses of power. When granted a clearance, the newly-cleared person gets briefed on acceptable methods of alerting people to those kinds of issues — in fact, they’re usually repeated in security briefings that occur on a regular basis.

The first in the military is to go through one’s chain of command, starting with the unit leader, and if that doesn’t work, the commanding officer of the facility.  The military has other options, such as contacting the Pentagon, if that doesn’t work or if the lawbreaking/abusive activity continues.  Some of those allow for anonymity as well.  In the private sector, a whistleblower can contact the facility security officer (FSO), or the agency that provided the clearance.   Finally, if all else fails, a whistleblower can go to Congress.  Certain members have security clearances which would allow for the discussion of sensitive issues, and it wouldn’t take long to figure out which of those might be sympathetic to whatever issues the whistleblower has to discuss.

None of the paths involve passing classified information to domestic news media, not “selected” documents, and certainly not in bulk.  They don’t involve passing classified data to foreign media, either.  If this is the best defense that Manning’s team can muster, they are in deep doo-doo.

Recently in the Green Room:

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

I’m surprised they haven’t used the Twinkie Defense yet.

John the Libertarian on January 19, 2013 at 6:37 PM

Similar to the irrational defense of ObamaCare, Manning’s defense will argue that he’s protected by either the “General Welfare Clause” or the “Necessary and Proper Clause” — even if those arguments are self-contradictory … just please pick one (or, if you’re Justice Roberts, bring your own)!

ShainS on January 19, 2013 at 7:12 PM

“There are, in fact, a few ways that a real whistleblower with a security clearance can alert people to violations of the law or abuses of power. When granted a clearance, the newly-cleared person gets briefed on acceptable methods of alerting people to those kinds of issues — in fact, they’re usually repeated in security briefings that occur on a regular basis.” – E.M.

LMAO
Surely, Ed, you aren’t that naíve.
~(Ä)~

Karl Magnus on January 20, 2013 at 12:04 PM