Green Room

Video: Harry Reid vs. Harry Reid on the Filibuster

posted at 2:02 pm on December 7, 2012 by

Before you watch this clip, go read Dustin’s grist-for-the-mill post about filibuster “reform.”  Additional background on the issue is available here.   And now, here’s our Senate Majority/Minority leader making an impassioned case for/against changing the chamber’s longstanding filibuster rules (via the Senate Republican Conference):

In case you were curious, this man’s national job approval rating stands at 24 percent.  Liberals may protest that Republicans’ 2005 proposed (and abandoned) rule changes were substantively different than the package Democrats are considering now.  This is true.  The GOP sought to eliminate filibusters on judicial appointments, arguing that the Constitution’s “advise and consent” clause made no mention of a super-majority threshold for confirmation.  Indeed, the framers even debated including a provision that would have required a super-majority to block a presidential appointment.  Democrats vehemently objected (“Un-American!”) at the time, leading to the Gang of 14 compromise — which averted any formal alterations to Senate protocol.   Come January, Democrats will control 55 Senate seats, the same number Republicans held when they flirted with the nuclear option nearly eight years ago.

Reid’s caucus is looking to shift several filibuster regulations, including the elimination of cloture votes on motions to proceed.  Former Sen. Judd Gregg (R-NH) recently told me that although this concept seems innocuous, the initial vote to green-light debate on a piece of legislation is absolutely critical because that moment represents the peak of the minority’s leverage.  By stalling or threatening to block the advancement of a bill, the minority party can effectively demand a hand in shaping the debate —  for example, by negotiating votes on amendments.  (Not amendments, mind you, votes on amendments).  Once a motion to proceed has been adopted, the majority dominates the process from that point forward.  Harry Reid has abused this power, regularly denying Republicans the opportunity to offer amendments by employing a maneuver called “filling the amendment tree.”   He’s done so more than his six immediate predecessors combined. This explains why Republicans, shut out from offering any amendments, have retaliated by launching the “record number” of filibusters we often hear about in the media.  Reid has also already changed Senate rules once in order to box out a Republican attempt to force a tough vote on the president’s jobs plan in 2011.

Ultimately, though, the differences between the 2005 and 2012 filibuster reform plans are immaterial.  The video above shows Reid strenuously opposing filibuster rule changes on principle.  He insisted in 2005 that  he would “never, ever consider breaking the rules to change the rules,” which is how Democrats referred to simple-majority rule changes back then.  Now he’s shrugging it off; hey, “rules change around here.”   Shameless.

Recently in the Green Room:

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

I really despise the little weasel

cmsinaz on December 7, 2012 at 2:21 PM

A government powerful enough to give you anything you want, is powerful enough to take away everything you have.

Jabberwock on December 7, 2012 at 2:41 PM

Reid behaving like a hypocritical DB? Not exactly man bites dog.

Kataklysmic on December 7, 2012 at 2:48 PM

I really despise the little weasel

cmsinaz on December 7, 2012 at 2:21 PM

Me too.

I honestly believe he is more of a partisan obstructionist than 0webowmao himself.

Anti-Control on December 7, 2012 at 3:00 PM

Look, I hate Harry Reid. But I’m having a hard time being angry about one particular change to the filibuster. I think having to actually talk a bill to death is good rather than someone just having to say “I filibuster” and that’s it.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HX8aFpnWxPA

AngusMc on December 7, 2012 at 3:15 PM

Angus, please note the part of my post about the elimination of the filibuster of motions to proceed. The “forcing a real talk-a-thon” thing isn’t the only element of Democrats’ proposed “reforms.”

Guy Benson on December 7, 2012 at 3:24 PM

Look what Nevada has brought upon the nation…

right2bright on December 7, 2012 at 3:52 PM

Look, I hate Harry Reid. But I’m having a hard time being angry about one particular change to the filibuster. I think having to actually talk a bill to death is good rather than someone just having to say “I filibuster” and that’s it.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HX8aFpnWxPA

AngusMc on December 7, 2012 at 3:15 PM

And this is how people like Obama get elected…they are easily fooled.

It isn’t “one particular change”…how easy it is to fool the people…gee I wonder how Obama got elected??

right2bright on December 7, 2012 at 3:54 PM

So Harry is a flip flopper ? Disgusting dishonest little commie.

FlaMurph on December 7, 2012 at 9:28 PM

Not even the Green Room shrubs could muster the requisite COURAGE!

December 7, 1941 — a date which will live in infamy…

A date which will live in — Infamy?

Not if you’re HotAir.com — or Google — or Yahoo.

HotAir.com posts NOTHING on Pearl Harbor Day to commemorate the horrific Japanese surprise attack on the American Naval Fleet in port at Pearl Harbor leaving 2,402 Americans killed and 1,282 Americans wounded — many of them civilians.

Pathetic.

This website has gone to crap ever since Michelle Malkin sold out to the highest bidder.

HotAir.com — Guaranteed Soft & SquishyOr Your Money Back

FlatFoot on December 7, 2012 at 11:40 PM

Harry Reid “evolved”.

tommy71 on December 7, 2012 at 11:41 PM

HotAir.com — Guaranteed Soft & Squishy™ Or Your Money Back

FlatFoot on December 7, 2012 at 11:40 PM

AngusMc on December 7, 2012 at 3:15 PM

Hmmmm.

CW on December 8, 2012 at 2:58 PM