Green Room

Heads I win, tails you lose

posted at 1:40 pm on November 29, 2012 by

This National Journal story popped up in the headlines earlier, but I think it merits a slightly closer look.  The rub:

Senate Democrats say they have made their opening bid on the revenue side by pushing House Republicans to approve a Senate-passed bill to extend the Bush-era tax cuts for the middle class while raising tax rates on the wealthy. Now, Democrats want Republicans to offer up the spending cuts they want to see – a move the GOP doesn’t seem inclined to make right now … For their part, Republicans argue that they have passed a budget that included significant entitlement reforms and now it’s up to the president to say what cuts he will support.

I’ll admit it.  Sometimes I find myself taken by a perverse admiration for Democrats’ sheer cajones.  Here’s how I describe their magnanimous “negotiating” posture over at Townhall:

Democrats’ “opening bid” is an insistence that Republicans agree to (job-killing,drop-in-the-deficit-bucket) tax increases on the rich.  This offer involves precisely zero compromise on their part, of course.  Their next bold move is to say, “ok, guys, now that we’ve repeated ourselves for the umpteenth time on stickin’ it to the rich for jollies, it’s time for you to outline specific entitlement cuts that we can use to paint you as heartless bastards.”  …  Perhaps this is what Dick Durbin meant when he said entitlement reform should be “on the table.”  It’ll only be on the table in the sense that Democrats will continue to commit to jack squat, using the safety of their do-nothing crouch to attack the only meaningful ideas being offered by either side.  In short: You give us everything we want, then you do the politically-risky heavy lifting on everything else, which we’ll probably just use to batter you over the head anyway. Compromise!

Yes, if only these damned Republicans would actually commit to controversial but necessary entitlement reform plans on paper, then we might finally get somewhere.  What a bunch of cowards, right?


UPDATE
Politico is reporting on the same dynamic, so this really is a thing, it seems.

Recently in the Green Room:

Blowback

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Why are Republicans still negotiating? Just give Obama what he wants and let the whole economy go to hell… Just to be on record they need to put two bills to be voted on:

Bill # 1: Extend the Bush tax cuts to people making up to $ 200,000 a yaer per individual and $ 250,000 per couples. This bill will pass and signed by Obama.

Bill # 2: Also extend the Bush cut to people making more than $ 200,000 a year per individual and $ 250,000 per couples. This bill may not pass the democrat senate and for certain it will be vetoed by Obama. However Obama and the socialists now will own the disaster of taking the economy to hell by increasing taxes on the job creators.

So stop the negotiations and submit these two simple bills tomorrow for vote…

mnjg on November 29, 2012 at 1:58 PM

If we had people on our side, r’s that is, with an ounce of testosterone to ACTUALLY stand up FOR the US and the citizens who put/funded those worthless slugs to stand up for us, a huge herd of pigs would fly for months over dc! I am so sick of these spineless worms caving if they think for one minute that bhopress/d’s will say something nasty about them! bhopress/d’s WILL always say nasty things and blame r’s and those of us who voted for them for everything!
L

letget on November 29, 2012 at 2:02 PM

The people ignorant enough to support Obama and swallow the media line are going to blame the GOP no matter what.

The country is headed into a recession, as evidenced by the revised personal consumption numbers from the Q3 GDP (all of upward revision was government spending and inventories, personal expenditures are weakening). There is nothing to be done about it now.

Adjoran on November 29, 2012 at 3:13 PM

It’s “cojones“, not “cajones“.

/nitpick

TSUGambler on November 29, 2012 at 3:21 PM

I think the two bills for extending the Bush tax cuts are a great idea… but aside from that, if we’re going to give the Democrats what they want and let them see what actually happens, the Republicans will need to vote “present,” rather than actually voting FOR any of the Democrats’ bills. If we vote for them, they’ll come back and say they passed with bipartisan support. If we vote against them, they’ll say we’re obstructionist. The only way to let them get burned and have no one but themselves to blame is to vote “present” or abstain altogether. (Caveat: I have no knowledge of the parliamentary procedures used in House/Senate votes, so I’m not completely sure this is even possible. Feel free to enlighten me.)

TSUGambler on November 29, 2012 at 3:24 PM

TSUGambler

You are 100% correct. It will become a bi-partisan plan where no one could have seen the consequences – thus the blame falls on the Republicans for holding it up until December. In all reality, Obama could pass this by EO and the Republicans would still get all the blame and the media would be more than happy to push that.

Deets on November 29, 2012 at 4:43 PM


HotAir — Politics, Culture, Media, 2017, Breaking News from a conservative viewpoint
Top Pick

Bad vendor. Bad! No cookie!

Top Pick

“The Corps is just starting to grapple with the issues the court has identified.”

“So you want me to sing my praises, is that what you’re saying?”

Why would we possibly want that?

“I mean he sold our country to The Russians.”

I could think of someone else you might want to ask about…

“You can ask a hundred people what hate speech is and you get a thousand different answers”

Trump: I never made any recordings of Comey

Allahpundit Jun 22, 2017 2:01 PM

Bluff.

Hackers stole private data from election databases

John Sexton Jun 22, 2017 1:21 PM

“90,000 records stolen by Russian state actors contained drivers license numbers”

Failure to protect the city

Big man on the Middle Eastern campus

Biased Americans see media as biased.

Tough times down on the liberal ranch

Will Nancy Pelosi survive this latest Dem disaster?

Andrew Malcolm Jun 22, 2017 8:41 AM

Eat quick, before it’s gone.

Slow your roll, boss

“I’m bothered by the lack of emerging evidence…”

FIrst look at the Senate health bill

John Sexton Jun 21, 2017 9:21 PM

“the Senate bill would go farther than the House version in its approach to cutting Medicaid spending.”

Divide and conquer?

“If we do nothing, more companies will back out and more people will lose coverage.”

You know, I may have cracked the case for you, guys

“They’re still running against her and still winning races.”

“…the suspect is from Quebec and has a Canadian passport.”

When the Left lost their way on immigration

Jazz Shaw Jun 21, 2017 2:41 PM

It wasn’t all that long ago, really

“I personally watched some of these students go up to Chief Brown, right up to her face, and call her all kinds of names, cursing at her.”

Did the Queen “nix” a Trump visit to London?

Jazz Shaw Jun 21, 2017 12:41 PM

More like wishful thinking on the American left

Sometimes it’s hard. This was the hardest part

Did the polls get the Handel/Ossoff race wrong?

Allahpundit Jun 21, 2017 11:21 AM

Nah.

Physician, heal thyself

Maybe we’ll stay home and watch.

Good lack of work if you can get it

GOP takes 2 more special House races, meaning what?

Andrew Malcolm Jun 21, 2017 8:41 AM

Two more demoralizing moral victories for Dems.

Not a murder, but nearly as awful