Comments on: Video: Nancy Pelosi, constitutional scholar

By: hopeful

hopeful — Fri, 16 Nov 2012 21:26:18 +0000

Sad thing is, I bet an opponent could put this in a campaign ad against her and her supporters would think nothing of it.

By: change is for suckers

change is for suckers — Fri, 16 Nov 2012 19:12:37 +0000

Ted Torgerson on November 16, 2012 at 2:04 PM

“Good and proper,” “good and plenty,” whatever it is, I’m with the Constitution of the United States.

By: Ted Torgerson

Ted Torgerson — Fri, 16 Nov 2012 19:04:53 +0000

change is for suckers on November 16, 2012 at 12:28 PM

Silly wingnut don’t you know it’s the good and plenty clause.

By: The Rogue Tomato

The Rogue Tomato — Fri, 16 Nov 2012 18:55:57 +0000

She probably thinks she swore to uphold and defend the Constipation.

By: radjah shelduck

radjah shelduck — Fri, 16 Nov 2012 18:20:41 +0000

With people in Congress like her, I’m just glad we have the 27th Amendment.

Attention liberals: the 14th Amendment does NOT repeal the 10th Amendment. If it did, the opening phrase would be worded like the first words of the 21st Amendment.

By: Henry Parsons

Henry Parsons — Fri, 16 Nov 2012 18:11:28 +0000

I used to think that keeping Princess Pelosi around was a good thing, as we could perpetually point out the abject stupidity that emanates from her.

Unfortunately, her continued presence has instead validated the theory of the Dunning-Kruger effect in the American electorate.

By: UltimateBob

UltimateBob — Fri, 16 Nov 2012 18:06:12 +0000

Oh, come on. A 30-second commercial before the auto-play video starts? This is BS.

By: Dopenstrange

Dopenstrange — Fri, 16 Nov 2012 17:58:35 +0000

The 11th Amendment…the 12th Amendment — whatever it takes…

By: ToddPA

ToddPA — Fri, 16 Nov 2012 17:56:46 +0000

What a fumb duck. Everyone knows that what she’s looking for is found in the “good and proper clause.”

change is for suckers on November 16, 2012 at 12:28 PM

…hey, at least she didn’t say Guam would Tip over.

By: earlgrey133

earlgrey133 — Fri, 16 Nov 2012 17:38:33 +0000

Well I don’t know, didn’t John Roberts “prove” her right on Obamacare. Doesn’t seem to be much of a difference there.

By: Abby Adams

Abby Adams — Fri, 16 Nov 2012 17:32:47 +0000

How many do you suppose would pass?

I’ll be the optimist and say out of the 535 members (on a 15 question quiz), 25-30 would get perfect scores, another 75-80 would miss one or two questions, and another 250-275 would miss 3-5 questions.

“Only” about 150 or so would get less than 66%.

By: change is for suckers

change is for suckers — Fri, 16 Nov 2012 17:28:22 +0000

What a fumb duck. Everyone knows that what she’s looking for is found in the “good and proper clause.”

By: Illinidiva

Illinidiva — Fri, 16 Nov 2012 17:21:28 +0000

Hey.. Maybe that should be a requirement for running for President. After all, people who want to become citizens have to pass a test.

By: Illinidiva

Illinidiva — Fri, 16 Nov 2012 17:19:25 +0000

Ron Paul would probably pass as well.

By: changer1701

changer1701 — Fri, 16 Nov 2012 17:16:01 +0000

How many do you suppose would pass?

Two: Rand Paul and Paul Ryan.