Green Room

Video: Nancy Pelosi, constitutional scholar

posted at 12:12 pm on November 16, 2012 by

Via Breitbart, the latest deep thought from a legislator who once described ObamaCare as a “right” and famously replied to a question about the constitutional underpinnings of the mandate with, “Are you serious?” This time the subject was the debt ceiling.

I’d pay good money to watch her — or actually any member of Congress — take a pop quiz on the Constitution designed for, say, a seventh-grade civics class. Nothing fancy, just the basics on different federal powers and where in the document those powers are (or aren’t) specifically granted. No studying, though; it has to be a pop quiz so that we can see what sort of knowledge our leaders are walking around with day to day. How many do you suppose would pass?

Recently in the Green Room:

Blowback

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

How many do you suppose would pass?

Two: Rand Paul and Paul Ryan.

changer1701 on November 16, 2012 at 12:16 PM

Ron Paul would probably pass as well.

Illinidiva on November 16, 2012 at 12:19 PM

Hey.. Maybe that should be a requirement for running for President. After all, people who want to become citizens have to pass a test.

Illinidiva on November 16, 2012 at 12:21 PM

What a fumb duck. Everyone knows that what she’s looking for is found in the “good and proper clause.”

change is for suckers on November 16, 2012 at 12:28 PM

How many do you suppose would pass?

I’ll be the optimist and say out of the 535 members (on a 15 question quiz), 25-30 would get perfect scores, another 75-80 would miss one or two questions, and another 250-275 would miss 3-5 questions.

“Only” about 150 or so would get less than 66%.

Abby Adams on November 16, 2012 at 12:32 PM

Well I don’t know, didn’t John Roberts “prove” her right on Obamacare. Doesn’t seem to be much of a difference there.

earlgrey133 on November 16, 2012 at 12:38 PM

What a fumb duck. Everyone knows that what she’s looking for is found in the “good and proper clause.”

change is for suckers on November 16, 2012 at 12:28 PM

…hey, at least she didn’t say Guam would Tip over.

ToddPA on November 16, 2012 at 12:56 PM

The 11th Amendment…the 12th Amendment — whatever it takes…

Dopenstrange on November 16, 2012 at 12:58 PM

Oh, come on. A 30-second commercial before the auto-play video starts? This is BS.

UltimateBob on November 16, 2012 at 1:06 PM

I used to think that keeping Princess Pelosi around was a good thing, as we could perpetually point out the abject stupidity that emanates from her.

Unfortunately, her continued presence has instead validated the theory of the Dunning-Kruger effect in the American electorate.

Henry Parsons on November 16, 2012 at 1:11 PM

With people in Congress like her, I’m just glad we have the 27th Amendment.

Attention liberals: the 14th Amendment does NOT repeal the 10th Amendment. If it did, the opening phrase would be worded like the first words of the 21st Amendment.

radjah shelduck on November 16, 2012 at 1:20 PM

She probably thinks she swore to uphold and defend the Constipation.

The Rogue Tomato on November 16, 2012 at 1:55 PM

change is for suckers on November 16, 2012 at 12:28 PM

Silly wingnut don’t you know it’s the good and plenty clause.

Ted Torgerson on November 16, 2012 at 2:04 PM

Ted Torgerson on November 16, 2012 at 2:04 PM

“Good and proper,” “good and plenty,” whatever it is, I’m with the Constitution of the United States.

change is for suckers on November 16, 2012 at 2:12 PM

Sad thing is, I bet an opponent could put this in a campaign ad against her and her supporters would think nothing of it.

hopeful on November 16, 2012 at 4:26 PM


HotAir — Politics, Culture, Media, 2017, Breaking News from a conservative viewpoint

Fixing crime in America is a complicated issue

Taylor Millard Jun 23, 2017 8:31 PM
Top Pick

Cops alone won’t solve it.

Top Pick

Victim’s father was President Maduro’s supervisor back when he was a bus driver.

Democrats forgot all about the “era of good feelings”

“Bernie and Jane Sanders have lawyered up.”

“the Judiciary Committee is examining the circumstances surrounding the removal of James Comey.”

Winning isn’t everything. It is the only thing

Trump signs VA reform bill into law

John Sexton Jun 23, 2017 2:41 PM

“What happened was a national disgrace, and yet some of the employees involved in these scandals remained on the payrolls.”

A new era of something.

“…died suddenly in less than a week just after his return to the U.S.”

The shortsightedness of “Denounce and Preserve”

Taylor Millard Jun 23, 2017 12:11 PM

Pragmatism for the sake of pragmatism doesn’t always work.

Perhaps if you threw in a new car?

Gay marriages still growing, but not as fast

Andrew Malcolm Jun 23, 2017 10:31 AM

More, but not as quickly.

Should’ve stuck with the pirate gig. It was working for him

The battle for the rubble of Raqqa is underway

Andrew Malcolm Jun 23, 2017 8:51 AM

Won’t be much left.

Your list of demands is a publicity stunt

“what happened that day was emblematic of a deeply troubling trend among progressives…”

“The jobs are still leaving. Nothing has stopped.”

Bad vendor. Bad! No cookie!

“The Corps is just starting to grapple with the issues the court has identified.”

“So you want me to sing my praises, is that what you’re saying?”

Why would we possibly want that?

“I mean he sold our country to The Russians.”

I could think of someone else you might want to ask about…

“You can ask a hundred people what hate speech is and you get a thousand different answers”

Trump: I never made any recordings of Comey

Allahpundit Jun 22, 2017 2:01 PM

Bluff.

Hackers stole private data from election databases

John Sexton Jun 22, 2017 1:21 PM

“90,000 records stolen by Russian state actors contained drivers license numbers”

Failure to protect the city

Big man on the Middle Eastern campus

Biased Americans see media as biased.

Tough times down on the liberal ranch

Will Nancy Pelosi survive this latest Dem disaster?

Andrew Malcolm Jun 22, 2017 8:41 AM

Eat quick, before it’s gone.

Slow your roll, boss

“I’m bothered by the lack of emerging evidence…”

FIrst look at the Senate health bill

John Sexton Jun 21, 2017 9:21 PM

“the Senate bill would go farther than the House version in its approach to cutting Medicaid spending.”

Divide and conquer?