Green Room

Pew: MSNBC’s coverage of Romney more negative than Fox’s of Obama

posted at 1:31 pm on November 2, 2012 by

If you understand MSNBC as an attempt to counterprogram the liberal caricature of Fox News rather than the actual Fox News, this is unsurprising:

According to Pew, four years ago the numbers for Fox and MSNBC were essentially mirror images of each other vis-a-vis Obama and McCain. If you notice the dates in the graphic, you might be tempted to conclude that the negativity was driven by Romney’s fading polls during September. Not so. If that’s the case, then his resurrection after the Mile-High Massacre on October 3 should have cut sharply into the positive/negative gap. And besides, per Pew, his numbers were actually worse on MSNBC in non-horserace coverage:

MSNBC was especially negative in its treatment of Romney’s policy prescriptions. Fully 75% of the stories focused on Romney’s policies were negative compared with 1% that were positive. For Obama, by comparison, 32% of policy stories were favorable while 18% were negative.

I must have missed the one percent that were positive, unless they ran those in the first half-hour of Scarborough’s show at 6 a.m. to clear the way for the rest of the day. Exit question: How is it that Obama’s coverage from late August to late October was nearly even on CNN and positive (of course) on MSNBC when that period overlaps almost perfectly with the drip-drip-drip of Benghazi revelations?

Recently in the Green Room:

Blowback

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

exit question: gotta prop up dear leader…deflect, deflect, deflect

cmsinaz on November 2, 2012 at 1:39 PM

MSNBC was especially negative in its treatment of Romney’s policy prescriptions. Fully 75% of the stories focused on Romney’s policies were negative compared with 1% that were positive. For Obama, by comparison, 32% of policy stories were favorable while 18% were negative.

First of all, color me not surprised. Secondly, only 1% of the stories were positive?! I’d love to know which policy they liked.

Doughboy on November 2, 2012 at 1:40 PM

No

WAY!!!

JohnGalt23 on November 2, 2012 at 1:45 PM

Are we supposed to be able to read that graphic? Because it is too freaking small and it doesn’t enlarge.

woodNfish on November 2, 2012 at 1:47 PM

First of all, color me not surprised. Secondly, only 1% of the stories were positive?! I’d love to know which policy they liked.

Doughboy on November 2, 2012 at 1:40 PM

Probably a story about Romney praising Romneycare or some such.

jarodea on November 2, 2012 at 1:50 PM

You guys want to see my shocked face?

This is my shocked face.

=O

Red Cloud on November 2, 2012 at 2:03 PM

The graphic displayed here is misleading. It makes it look like the 46% of Fox’s Obama coverage being negative is almost as much as the 71% of MSNBC’s Romney coverage being negative.

The green Fox-Obama bar should be less than two-thirds as long as the green MSNBC-Romney bar.

J.S.K. on November 2, 2012 at 2:08 PM

Duh

levi on November 2, 2012 at 2:31 PM

What’s more amusing is the CNN line.

mrscullen on November 2, 2012 at 2:38 PM

I think the real story of this is shattering the myth of CNN as the “centrist” news organization.

Fox: Pro-Romney bias (net pro-Romney stories – net pro-Obama stories)
Romney: 28-12 = +16
Obama: 6-46 = -40
Net 16 – -40 = 56 net Romney bias points.

MSNBC: Pro-Obama bias (net pro-Obama stories – net pro-Romney stories)
Obama: 39-15 = +24
Romney: 3-71 = -68
Net: 24 – -68 = 92 net Obama bias points

CNN: (same equation as MSNBC)
Obama: 21-18 = +3
Romney: 11-36 = -25
Net: 3 – -25 = 28 net Obama bias points

So yes, significantly more centrist than Fox, but still has a substantial liberal lean. It actually works out pretty nicely: MSNBC is about as close to completely biased as you can get. Fox splits the difference between MSNBC and perfect fairness and CNN splits the difference between Fox and perfect fairness.

LukeinNE on November 2, 2012 at 2:57 PM

How about adding in the negativity on Romney from the rest of the rotten lying left-biased slimestream media? That would make FOX’s negativity on the left barely measurable.

stukinIL4now on November 2, 2012 at 4:02 PM

Wow, that graph is really misleading in the way they display the percentages. I’m guessing the percentages omitted from the full 100% are the neutral stories? So fox has 46% neg 6% pos 48% neut and msnbc has 71% neg 3% pos and 26% neut. If thats the case, why is the 52% of pos/neg fox stories represented by a bar that is the same height as msnbc’s 74% of pos/neg stories? It gives the impression at first glance that fox and msnbc are the same. But they aren’t, they have much more neutral stories in relation to their negative and positive stories than msnbc. Msnbc seems to just be negative with a sprinkling of neutral stories and positive stories.

Do not like.

Smiles on November 2, 2012 at 4:12 PM


HotAir — Politics, Culture, Media, 2017, Breaking News from a conservative viewpoint
Top Pick

Button it up.

Top Pick

“I repeat I am innocent of these charges. They are false.”

Just a reminder: People will die

Allahpundit Jun 28, 2017 10:41 PM

“Whipped cream’s killing more people than ever before.”

Medicare for all?

“There comes a point where you gotta get off the crazy train.”

Poll: Dem voters glumly sticking with Pelosi

Ed Morrissey Jun 28, 2017 8:41 PM

Disaster ahead?

“When she left it, it was in better shape than it had ever been.”

Manafort, firm registers as foreign agents

Ed Morrissey Jun 28, 2017 6:41 PM

Better late than never?

Delivered as promised

“I would like to think that the president saved many innocent men, women and children.”

“The Russia investigation was by far the dominant topic…”

The merry little media war continues.

Criminal enterprise

Politico: Has the SPLC lost its way?

John Sexton Jun 28, 2017 3:01 PM

“The organization has always tried to find ways to milk money out of the public…”

Trump legal team backing away from Comey complaint?

Ed Morrissey Jun 28, 2017 2:31 PM

De-escalation?

Time to get up and go to work, sir

CNN gets glum, defensive after resignations

John Sexton Jun 28, 2017 1:01 PM

“If Jeff lit himself on fire, it wouldn’t appease the pro-Trump media.”

Hmmm: FBI probing Russia-based anti-virus firm?

Ed Morrissey Jun 28, 2017 12:31 PM

“I wouldn’t put their stuff on my computer if you paid me.”

He works hard for the money…

It’s not a slippery slope. It’s a freaking avalanche.

Nuts.

Showdown: Sarah Palin vs the New York Times

Jazz Shaw Jun 28, 2017 9:21 AM

Defamation

Credit where creditor’s due?

More flash than bang, but a very bad sign

“Felix was out on bond after threatening another public servant and has a history of making threats.”

Chaffetz: House needs housing allowances?

Ed Morrissey Jun 27, 2017 8:41 PM

“There are dozens upon dozens of members living in their offices, and I don’t know how healthy that is long term.”

“This isn’t going to get a lot cheaper, it can’t, it won’t.”

“…what we failed to achieve with votes, we would do with weapons.”

“[S]o dumb it’s amazing we even have to have the conversation.”

“It was not necessary.”

“You’re inflaming everyone right here right now with those words!”

“Trump’s people said, ‘We’ll be writing the speech that the President’s Audio-Animatronic figure will be saying.'”

Excuses, excuses.

Not really a “kill all the lawyers” scenario