Green Room

‘Apology tour’ lie exposed? What lie?

posted at 11:37 am on October 24, 2012 by

In the midst of their high-fiving over the president’s “commanding” performance in Monday night’s presidential debate, liberals are finding time to express their righteous indignation over Mitt Romney’s mention of Obama’s 2009 “apology tour.”

When ABC anchor George Stephanopoulos asked after the debate, “Any glaring misstatements by either candidate?” Senior Political Correspondent Jonathan Karl harrumphed, “The President didn’t apologize for America. He did acknowledge some mistakes that the United States had made, but there’s no way you could really call it ‘an apology tour.’”

Ditto for CNN, which branded the characterization as “False” and the Christian Science Monitor, which did back flips in its effort to discredit the claim, simultaneously taking Republicans to task for their own arrogance in not accepting the gospel according to the “fact-checkers.”

The president didn’t need their help. He was in full denial mode during the debate, when he declared:

Nothing Governor Romney just said is true, starting with this notion of me apologizing. This has been probably the biggest whopper that’s been told during the course of this campaign. And every fact checker and every reporter who’s looked at it, Governor, has said this is not true.

On second thought, maybe he did need their help.

What seems to be lost in all the back-and-forth is the notion of literality. Did the president, while standing on foreign soil, in 2009, use the word apologize or apology when describing the past actions of the United States? No. Is either of those words or a phrase such as I’m sorry or forgive me a necessary condition for declaring an utterance to be apologetic? Before you answer, consider the following hypotheticals:

 “Yipes, I guess I made a mess of that!”

“That was indiscreet of Tom. I would have expected more of him.”

“My wife loses control when she has a few drinks.”

Compare those examples with this actual statement by the president:

In America, there’s a failure to appreciate Europe’s leading role in the world. Instead of celebrating your dynamic Union and seeking to partner with you to meet common challenges, there have been times where America has shown arrogance and been dismissive, even derisive.

A compendium of other similar statements can be found here, but the single example suffices to point up a mode of behavior that should have been odious and offensive to every American. It would have been had the speaker been someone other than a man in whom so many invested hope. The unwillingness of those on the left now, after four years, to concede that Obama’s words were not only apologetic but wrong-headed just shows how partisan and small-minded they are.

Related Articles

Follow me on Twitter or join me at Facebook. You can also reach me at howard.portnoy@gmail.com.

Recently in the Green Room:

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

It doesn’t hurt to keep pointing that out.

“Apology tour” must really hurt.

0bama acted stupidly.

cozmo on October 24, 2012 at 11:43 AM

Regardless what the rabid Obama supporters might care to believe (who can tell them anything, anyway?), I think Romney’s withering assault on Obama using the words “apology tour” resonated deeply with many. And I believe “apology tour” likely also connected really well with moderate Dems.

That charge against Obama is valid and connected with viscerally by many.

notta_dhimmi on October 24, 2012 at 12:02 PM

Obama has always winked to his anti-American leftist base and used plausible deniability to avoid scaring off mainstream Democrats. His base supports apologising for the sins of the USKKKA, as Rev Wright would say, while most mainstream Democrats would be against it. So Obabma tries to have it both ways.

Pervygrin on October 24, 2012 at 1:11 PM

Faux outrage. The more faux, the more accurate the criticism.

BigAlSouth on October 24, 2012 at 1:21 PM

Gee, “apology tour” was a pretty well-used and common term for that trip in certain circles. I guess we know who Romney and his campaign pay attention to.

stukinIL4now on October 24, 2012 at 3:25 PM

One of the ways to tell when something really sticks to them is to see how hard they work to wipe it off.

MikeA on October 24, 2012 at 7:10 PM

Agree re “Apology Tour” being used for a long time to describe that trip.

Calling the label “false” requires a deliberate suspension of intellect.

First, the characterization is an OPINION – opinions are not “true” or “false.”

Second, Obama’s schtick – “Previous Presidents & Administrations screwed up but I’m fixing all that now” – can be properly described as apologizing for your predecessors “acting stupidly” … along with stroking your own ego.

BD57 on October 24, 2012 at 7:42 PM

I remember the apology tour – and how disgusted I was at the time; I’m still disgusted by it.
As bad as the scurrilous comments about America were, as bad as the denial of American exceptionalism was, for me the worst thing of all was seeing the scum sucking SOB bow to tyrants. Watching him bow to the king of Saudi Arabia really set my hair on fire and engendered a white hot hatred that will never die.

single stack on October 24, 2012 at 8:32 PM