Green Room

What to expect in the next presidential debate

posted at 1:04 pm on October 13, 2012 by

Liberal pundits are rejoicing over Joe Biden’s … er—“interesting” performance during Thursday’s vice presidential debate. Many are claiming that Biden gave the Democratic base just the jolt it needed. This begs the question of how Biden’s antics will play among undecided voters or what impact it will have on the next presidential debate, which is scheduled for this coming Tuesday, Oct. 16th.

The chance to try to even the score probably can’t come soon enough for President Obama, who has been trailing in the polls since Oct. 9—the longest continuous such stretch during the current campaign season—and relishing a chance to go all Medieval on Mitt Romney’s sorry butt.

So what can he say that will turn the tide back in his direction? He could try doubling down on the Sesame Street strategy, which apparently is still on the table. As recently as Thursday, Obama spokesperson Jen Psaki told reporters aboard Air Force One that “there’s only one candidate in this race who is going to continue to fight for Big Bird and Elmo, and he is riding on this plane.”

But what else does the president have in his bag of tricks? Now that Mitt Romney’s “47%” remark is out there, Obama could try bringing that up, but then Romney will counter by reminding voters—while others will learn for the first time—about Obama’s put-down of “small town” voters who “get bitter” and “cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren’t like them.” The insult is sure to be a turn-off unless the listener is Jamelle Bouie, who admits that Obama’s comment was “inartful and condescending” but then attempts to explain it away by positing that it “came from a place of compassion—[that] Obama understands why white rural voters are arrayed against him.”

Obama could mention that Romney plans to do away with the two features of his health care reform law that don’t make voter wretch—the elimination of the waiting period for pre-existing conditions and the provision that children can stay on their parents’ plans until age 26. But Romney already took the air out of that argument in the first debate. He noted that he intends not only to repeal Obamacare but to replace it with a sounder health care reform law that includes not only these popular provisions but portability of premiums across state lines (which will create cost-lowering competition) and (one hopes) tort reform.

Will Obama boast, as he has recently on the campaign trail, that thanks to him al Qaeda is “on its heels”? Or will today’s headline of an al Qaeda-backed jailbreak in the Iraqi city of Tikrit, resulting in the escape of more than 100 prisoners, cause him to rethink this position? Will he brag about bagging Osama bin Laden, and if he does will Romney remind him of the chant of the Egyptian mob that stormed the U.S. embassy in Cairo on Sept. 11: “Obama, Obama there are still a billion Osamas”? Naturally, a mention of foreign policy will prompt Romney to reprise the question has campaign has been asking with regard to the attack on the American embassy in Benghazi and the killing of an American ambassador for the first time in 33 years—namely, what did the president know, and when did he know it?

Related Articles

Follow me on Twitter or join me at Facebook. You can also reach me at howard.portnoy@gmail.com.

Recently in the Green Room:

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

If bho brings up any issue about the rop type, that is the door for Mitt to go after bho/team big time on benghazi? Will bho chance bringing obl up on his own? I would think that someone might ask that question and let the cards fall big time for bho? bho/team hasn’t a leg to stand on about benghazi, IMO!
L

letget on October 13, 2012 at 1:25 PM

SNL is going to have to parody the Biden-Ryan debate (Biden’s not The Whine, it’s ok to make fun of him.) And while they’ll get their digs at Ryan, the take away is going to be the goofy Biden faces.

rbj on October 13, 2012 at 1:42 PM

It probably wouldn’t hurt during the debate to check the names of the audience questioners and Google them on sites like opensecrets.org to see if they have any past campaign donations leaning one way or the other, along with Facebook and Twitter searches to see if the ‘undecided’ questioners really are undecided.

Gaming the audience to get 1-2 people in there who’ll ask the kind of leading “When did you stop beating your wife?” questions seems to be the most likely way to shoehorn in some leftist attacks on Mitt which Team Obama would love to have their guy issue himself, but can’t because of how it would come across to the swing voters.

jon1979 on October 13, 2012 at 2:50 PM

I still think POTUS without TOTUS will ‘fall down go BOOM’ mentally and verbally – all he will have to fall back on is socialist/marxist/redistributionist community organizer slogans and talking points.
That will endear him to the lib/prog core (20 percent of voters at most)… and all others will say “Winning The Future was THAT?”

Marcola on October 13, 2012 at 3:15 PM

Obama is a bullshitter and shit disturber. He doesn’t actually see where his opponent is coming from. He’ll come at Romney pretty much like Biden did at Ryan, he thinks that will work. Romney doesn’t have to play by the set of rules that Ryan did. There is a fair chance that Obama will have his clock cleaned AGAIN, and Mitt will get another surge.

bigmike on October 13, 2012 at 3:26 PM

I’m actually looking forward to some Obama plants asking tough questions. It’s not like Mitt’s not anticipating it anyway, and giving him the chance to look reasonable, interested, compassionate and reply to what some independents or undecideds have been hearing as gossip anyway, to me can’t be a bad thing.

You’re talking like Mitt is Obama for goodness’ sake. I fully expect a repeat of the first two debates: polite, prepared, massively-competent-in-his-field challenger against condescending, defensive, angry, rude, incompetent and/or lazy incumbent.

Why are people nervous? This is Gore 2000 redux. People started tuning in just to see which Gore would show up: screamer/swaggerer, sigher or Anthony-Perkins-I’d-never-hurt-a-fly meek.

I can’t wait for Tuesday. Mitt will win again and Obama is going to get angrier and angrier. Desperate, angry people do stupid things.

inviolet on October 13, 2012 at 3:29 PM

Amen!

avagreen on October 13, 2012 at 5:13 PM