Green Room

As Romney’s lead in the polls widens, libs slip further into funk

posted at 5:46 pm on October 10, 2012 by

This wasn’t how it was supposed to be. Barack Obama, despite having placed the country’s future in greater jeopardy than he found it in 2008 and having no second-term plans for dealing with the deficit or entitlements, was supposed to coast to a second term against a hapless, floundering Mitt Romney.

Then along came that wretched debate and Romney lied and now he’s ahead in the polls by a full percentage point. Today’s Real Clear Politics average has Romney at 48.2%, the president at 47.2%. Romney now has    a lead of between 1 and 5 points in three polls, Obama a lead of between 1 and 3 in two others, and the two tied according to Gallup.

These are not fun times for the likes of Andrew Sullivan, who supplants one day’s desperate keenings with the next’s even louder wails of grief for what might (should?) have been.

But The Washington Post’s Ezra Klein is still back at the first stage of the grieving process, denial. His column today is titled “In excitable pundits vs. political scientists, I’ll take political scientists every time.” (Presumably he himself is not an excitable pundit, so he’s on safe ground casting stones.) Here’s his lede into an article that is optimistic about the state of the election:

Political scientists will tell you that debates don’t usually decide presidential elections, or even lead to noticeable changes in the polls. In their huge survey of every publicly available poll in the last 15 presidential campaigns, Robert Erikson and Christopher Wlezien concluded, “there is no case where we can trace a substantial shift to the debates.” A study by James Stimson came to much the same conclusion.

It’s possible that Klein penned the piece before today’s polling, but the current shift has been several days in the making. If you go back to Oct. 4, the day after the debate, Obama was still ahead 49.1% to 46%. By the end of the day yesterday, Obama had lost 1.8 percentage points and Romney had gained 2. The difference—3.8 percentage points—might strike even Robert Erikson and Christopher Wlezien as “noticeable.” So what is Klein babbling on about?

Besides if he is going to put all his faith in political science, shouldn’t he be worried that poli sci types are also responsible for the stat that no incumbent since Franklin Roosevelt has won re-election with the unemployment rate over 8%? Yes, I am aware of the happy, albeit inexplicable, tidings from the Bureau of Labor Statistics for the month of September, but one more jobs report is due out prior to Election Day. After 43 straight months of joblessness north of 8%, neither Obama nor Klein should be hanging their hopes on the recent jobs numbers.

Another truism of political science that Klein choose to ignore is that presidents who seek re-election in the midst of a sagging economy usually lose. The best example of this tendency is Herbert Hoover, who lost his bid for a second term in 1932, but more recent cases include Jimmy Carter in 1980 and George H. W. Bush in 1992.

Klein ventures off on his own when he notes that promises to cut the deficit are a loser with the electorate. He cites the fate of deficit-cutter Walter Mondale in 1984 and George H.W. Bush’s losing supply-side campaign. Ignoring the fact that a third-party candidate siphoned off votes from Bush the Elder, the fact remains that the deficit now is a thing apart from any previous deficit. And the primary reason for that is Obama, who increased the deficit he found on his first day of office by 50%.

Finally, Klein seems to be ignoring Team Obama’s antics of the past several days, particularly their effort to save Big Bird. The loony ad the campaign is running certainly has a number of Klein’s brethren gnashing their teeth. Then again, they don’t teach about Big Bird in political science courses, so maybe Klein is right to ignore the ad.

Related Articles

Follow me on Twitter or join me at Facebook. You can also reach me at howard.portnoy@gmail.com.

Recently in the Green Room:

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Not so much ‘funk’ as full-blown, frothing-at-the-mouth insanity (a la Olberdouche).

RoadRunner on October 10, 2012 at 6:06 PM

I’m still a contrarian. I still think that Dems trumpeting (or clinging to) the notion that Obama is comfortably ahead in the polls will ultimately backfire, and induce more complacency amongst Obama voters than it will resignation among Romney voters.

So, yeah, libs, keep screaming that Obama is going to win easily. I like it when you do that. Because nothing will stop most Romney voters from going to the polls, but The 47% need some real convincing to get up off the couch and vote. Telling them it’s in the bag, not to worry, is just going to allow them to lean back, say “Whew! Didn’t feel like moving anyway,” and stay home.

Zombie on October 10, 2012 at 6:44 PM

Just wait until 1 week before the election, when it finally dawns on them that they’re going to lose. You will see them going totally insane and I wouldn’t be surprised by violence. For the week after the election, you’ll see them completely freak out, throwing every sort of accusation around. And then once the glow of the election is off (about 3 days for a Republican), you’ll start to notice that the MSM suddenly realizes their duty to harass the newly elected president.

happi on October 10, 2012 at 6:51 PM

it ain’t over until it’s over…polling outfits used to pride themselves on accuracy (bragging rights) but after this election I think a lot of them will be “pursuing other interests”…used cars or real estate I think.

I’m a Wisconsin person (seems an election every 2 months here with recalls and “non-partisan” Supreme court stuff) and know that strategies are in place to create “illusions”.

teejk on October 10, 2012 at 7:13 PM

echo… It ain’t over till it’s over…

Never count your money while your sitting at the table…

We all have to push and push until the vote is counted.

And then maybe some more..

RockyJ. on October 10, 2012 at 7:18 PM

Yes the left seems to be imploding but 27 days in this election.. absolutely anything can happen…

Never stop until Romney is declared the winner.

RockyJ. on October 10, 2012 at 7:21 PM

RockyJ. on October 10, 2012 at 7:18 PM

…”fat lady sings” (whatever that means)
…”don’t count the chickens before they hatch”
…”bird in hand beats two in the bush”

we could go on and on…but the message is clear. let’s get this clown out of the WH.

now as I wrote that, occurs to me that every Olde English Court had a jester…sorry Biden…you are gone…meet your replacement Obama.

teejk on October 10, 2012 at 7:45 PM

So all Romney has to do is continue to lie and make off-the-wall comment each week that Obamuh can make himself look foolish over and the polls will keep flowing in his favor? Nah. It’s not about the polls. Just vote, baby vote!

stukinIL4now on October 10, 2012 at 8:43 PM

libs slip further into funk

Is it wrong that Air Supply’s “All Out Of Love” was going through my head when I read this?

malclave on October 10, 2012 at 8:55 PM

1960. There is precedent for a debate being a game changer. 1980 sealed the election for Reagan. Not a game changer, but it finished off any hope for History’s Greatest Monster.

TheLastBrainLeft on October 10, 2012 at 9:52 PM

Obama has thin skin. He can’t tolerate losing anything. That’s why he won’t shut up about the last debate. He’s still trying to win it.

MrX on October 10, 2012 at 10:18 PM

The only political science I trust is Randy Newman’s

marlin77 on October 10, 2012 at 10:31 PM

The only political science I trust is Randy Newman’s

marlin77 on October 10, 2012 at 10:34 PM

In excitable pundits vs. political scientists, I’ll take political scientists every time

No thanks. I’ll take the common-sense realist every time over the academic with his head up his ass.

dominigan on October 11, 2012 at 1:13 AM

Is it wrong that Air Supply’s “All Out Of Love” was going through my head when I read this?

malclave on October 10, 2012 at 8:55 PM

ROFL!

dominigan on October 11, 2012 at 1:13 AM