Green Room

In second debate Romney needs to fight fire with fire: expose Obama’s lies

posted at 12:33 pm on October 7, 2012 by

One thing that was absent from the first presidential debate was the truth—the word truth that is. A glimpse at the debate transcript reveals that the word never  came up at all, while true came up twice in an exchange of more than 16,000 words. Each candidate used it once, Mitt Romney indirectly to accuse the president of lying about his platform, Barack Obama overtly in his admission that health care premiums have risen since the passage of Obamacare two years ago.

The Obama campaign has announced plans to change all that in the second debate. In fact they intend to make the event a referendum on the truth, which they claim is in short supply in the Romney camp.

“Mitt Romney didn’t tell the American people the truth on Wednesday night,” The Hill quotes an Obama campaign official as saying. “He lied his way through the debate because he knows his ideas would hurt the middle class. Romney doesn’t want to be held accountable for wht he’s been saying for the last year because he knows that voters don’t want what he’s selling.”

Obama campaign spokeswoman Jan Psaki expanded on that theme on Friday, telling reporters:

If he’s unwilling to tell the truth about his record, tell the truth about his plans and the fact that he wants to put in place a $5 trillion tax cut for millionaires and billionaires and leave the burden on the middle class, then we’re happy to do the work for him.

This is a tall order. Part of the challenge is getting Romney somehow to own up to the fictionalized portrait of him they have crafted.

Take the talking point about his $5 trillion tax cut for the rich. Obama’s own deputy campaign manager Stephanie Cutter has already admitted on CNN that the effect of lowering tax rates across the board by 20% (which is actually what Romney has proposed) will not raise taxes anywhere “near $5 trillion.” In addition, the Tax Policy Center, the group originally posited that the only way to offset the costs of this proposal was to raise taxes on the middle class, has walked back that claim.

A second challenge for Team Obama is that this line of attack could easily blow up in the face of the president, who himself has been—to put it delicately—less than totally honest in his dealings with the American people. A falsehood that he gave utterance to in the first debate was that he has cut taxes for small businesses 18 times. But this claim can be explained away as double-counting (an “accounting technique” the administration used often), and Investor’s Business Daily called most of the cuts “worthless” in any case.

He also repeated the half-truth that his proposed tax hike on the rich would mark a return to Clinton-era rates. But this is an apples-and-oranges comparison, since Clinton also lowered capital gains taxes, which Obama intends to increase, given the chance.

Obama can’t even level with voters on the reasons for his desire to raise taxes on the rich during a fragile recovery. One day he claims—falsely—it is to lower the deficit. (The proposed increase would generate $31 billion in revenue, about one day’s worth of government spending using 2008 statistics.) The next day Obama insists that the move is based on “economic fairness,” though he never explains who appointed him the arbiter of what’s fair or how it is fair to raise taxes on the top 5% of earners, who currently absorb 60% of the nation’s tax debt.

For a president who has stretched, bent, folded, and manipulated the truth as often as Obama has, shouting “Liar!” in a crowded amphitheater may day more harm than good with an electorate that has already seen one side of him they didn’t like. The reason Obama lost the first debate is because no one ever had ever before directly challenged his half-baked and harmful policies. If he opens the door to a discussion of which candidate is the biggest liar, he will likely walk away from the podium a sadder, if not much wiser, man.

Related Articles

Follow me on Twitter or join me at Facebook. You can also reach me at howard.portnoy@gmail.com.

Recently in the Green Room:

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

I’ll say it right here: Mitt Romney doesn’t have the bawlz to call Obama out in this manner. Mark my words. He won’t.

gryphon202 on October 7, 2012 at 1:12 PM

I find it beyond belief that bho/team has the gall to accuse anyone of lying? There is not a truthful person in bho/team on anything! bho is the worse at lying. It is always someone elses fault for everything and even there bho lies! Anything bho brings up on something he has done that isn’t truthful, Mitt has the facts to back up bho’s lies!

I feel Mitt is smart enough not to fall into a trap from bho going after him. At least I sure pray so.
L

letget on October 7, 2012 at 1:16 PM

If the media and democrats in general had an ounce of self respect, this lying president of ours would be called out for every single lie, and would be impeached and possibly imprisoned by now.

KMC1 on October 7, 2012 at 1:46 PM

I’ll say it right here: Mitt Romney doesn’t have the bawlz to call Obama out in this manner. Mark my words. He won’t.

gryphon202 on October 7, 2012 at 1:12 PM

Completely agree. I’m often amused by the misapprehensions about Romney associated with advice like this. It’s simply not in him.

rrpjr on October 7, 2012 at 1:50 PM

A falsehood that he gave utterance to in the first debate was that he has cut taxes for small businesses 18 times.

Mitt response should be:” Mr Pres, if those were working, wouldn’t small businesses be hiring?”…

Obama can’t even level with voters on the reasons for his desire to raise taxes on the rich during a fragile recovery.

Mitt response should be: “Mr Pres, $31 billion would be the impact–tell Americans what % of the natl debt it will solve. If you can’t, I will (2%)”…

hillsoftx on October 7, 2012 at 2:46 PM

Listen to HP Mitt

cmsinaz on October 7, 2012 at 4:03 PM

Obama is the real liar, and Mitt has every right and reason to point that out.

It was Obama who said before Obamacare passed that if it passed, it would reduce the average American family’s health insurance premiums by $2,500. Well guess what? Obamacare passed, and since it passed the average American family’s health insurance premiums have increased by more than $2,700 (according to a recent study by the Kaiser Foundation). In other words, Obama lied.

Obama also continues to lie about the massive cuts that Obamacare made to Medicare. As Mitt correctly pointed out, Obamacare requires $716 Billion in cuts to Medicare. Obama’s camp responds by accusing Romney of telling “lies” about Medicare. They insist that the Medicare cuts won’t affect Medicare beneficiaries (seniors), because the 3/4 Trillion in cuts are only to Medicare providers (doctors and hospitals that treat Medicare patients)! LOL. Don’t worry, granny. Obama is slashing the amount that your doctor is paid for treating you, but it won’t affect the quality of your medical care! HAHAHA. How stupid do they think seniors are?

AZCoyote on October 8, 2012 at 9:36 AM