Green Room

Obama, the tax cutter, hits the campaign trail with Obama, the tax cut hater

posted at 12:57 pm on September 8, 2012 by

There may be only one America—not a red America and blue America—but there are surely two Barack Obamas. Both took the stage at a campaign rally in Portsmouth, N.H., on Friday to ridicule the GOP ticket for its plan to extend the Bush tax cuts for everyone, including for the wealthiest Americans.

Despite his acknowledgment in 2009 that “you don’t raise taxes in a recession,” Obama has since become a champion of economic fairness. Wearing that hat, he has repeatedly excoriated his opponents for their refusal to accept his moral truth that earners at the top should be willing to “do their fare share” and “pay a little more” to help the moribund economy turn around.

He did it again in Portsmouth, but in a haughty and mean-spirited fashion borne of desperation, reducing the Romney-Ryan approach to a comedic punch line:

Tax cuts, tax cuts, gut some regulations—oh, and more tax cuts. Tax cuts when times are good, tax cuts when times are bad. Tax cuts to help you lose a few extra pounds. Tax cuts to improve your love life. It will cure anything, according to them.

The jab drew approving snickers from a small crowd that was present to witness Obama, the tax cut hater, metamorphose before their eyes into Obama, the tax cutter. “We have cut taxes for small businesses 18 times,” he suddenly boasted.

Or “17, or 18, or 19 times,” to quote Press Secretary Jay Carney. “Whatever number they’re touting,” writes Investor’s Business Daily, “it’s bogus”:

In fact, if you look at Obama’s list [of alleged tax cuts for small business], you quickly realize that all but four have either expired or will soon expire, aren’t cuts at all, or are double-counted. And the rest are pretty much worthless.

There is also the unresolved matter of whether Obama’s plan to allow the tax cuts to lapse for those making more than $250,000 would adversely impact small business owners. Much has been made of the 3% figure. That is the “tiny” percentage of small business owners that would face higher tax bills, the administration claims. The IBD article points out that 3% still translates to 900,000-plus small firms that would still see their tax bills climb.

But is the 3% figure accurate? Kevin Hassett, director of economic policy studies and a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, and Alan D. Viard, a resident scholar, answered that question in a Wall Street Journal op-ed from 2010:

The 3% figure, which is computed from IRS data, is based on simply counting the number of returns with any pass-through business income. So, if somebody makes a little money selling products on eBay and reports that income on Schedule C of their tax return, they are counted as a small business. The fact that there are millions of people in the lower tax brackets with small amounts of business income may be interesting for some purposes, but it is irrelevant for the assessment of the economic impact of the tax hikes.

The numbers are clear. According to IRS data, fully 48% of the net income of sole proprietorships, partnerships, and S corporations reported on tax returns went to households with incomes above $200,000 in 2007.

A study released in July suggests even more pointedly that “millions of small businesses” (in the words of The Washington Post) “could be forced to cut jobs and wages, placing an enormous strain on the already sluggish economic recovery.” Critics will point out that the study, by the accounting firm Ernst & Young, was prepared on behalf of the Independent Community Bankers of America, the National Federation of Independent  Business, the S Corporation Association, and the United States Chamber of Commerce, and is hence partisan. But the numbers don’t lie.

Suffice it to say that raising taxes on any segment of the population, never mind job creators, at a time when the unemployment rate has declined from 8.3% to 8.1% only because more people have dropped out of the work force is a gamble. In July, when Obama was still trying out campaign slogans, one of the memes tested was “Betting on America.” His campaign was ultimately wise to reject it. Will the American people in November be wise enough to do the same with a man who is still willing to go all in using the house’s money?

Related Articles

Follow me on Twitter or join me at Facebook. You can also reach me at








Recently in the Green Room:



Trackback URL


If bho wasn’t out telling lies, he would be playing golf! Even then he probably lies about his score?

And now this! HOW long has bho/team known they needed to do this? Wanna bet it will be the Friday dump next week and it will be just horrible coming from bho/team?

letget on September 8, 2012 at 1:21 PM

So is Obama kind of like these guys from an original Star Trek episode titled Let That Be Your Last Battlefield and he has to like and hate himself at the same time?

stukinIL4now on September 8, 2012 at 2:54 PM

Tax cuts, tax cuts, gut some regulations—oh, and more tax cuts. Tax cuts when times are good, tax cuts when times are bad.

This should be the Republican position on taxes, but we are not fortunate enough to have Republicans with such good sense. And, of course, there need to be at least twice as many spending reductions as tax cuts. And then more spending cuts and gutted regulatory agencies.

What are so many people so blind to the urgent need for radical reductions in the size, scope, and spending of our government?

Steve Stoddard on September 8, 2012 at 5:31 PM

HotAir — Politics, Culture, Media, 2017, Breaking News from a conservative viewpoint
Top Pick

Why would we possibly want that?

Top Pick

“I mean he sold our country to The Russians.”

I could think of someone else you might want to ask about…

“You can ask a hundred people what hate speech is and you get a thousand different answers”

Trump: I never made any recordings of Comey

Allahpundit Jun 22, 2017 2:01 PM


Hackers stole private data from election databases

John Sexton Jun 22, 2017 1:21 PM

“90,000 records stolen by Russian state actors contained drivers license numbers”

Failure to protect the city

Big man on the Middle Eastern campus

Biased Americans see media as biased.

Tough times down on the liberal ranch

Will Nancy Pelosi survive this latest Dem disaster?

Andrew Malcolm Jun 22, 2017 8:41 AM

Eat quick, before it’s gone.

Slow your roll, boss

“I’m bothered by the lack of emerging evidence…”

FIrst look at the Senate health bill

John Sexton Jun 21, 2017 9:21 PM

“the Senate bill would go farther than the House version in its approach to cutting Medicaid spending.”

Divide and conquer?

“If we do nothing, more companies will back out and more people will lose coverage.”

You know, I may have cracked the case for you, guys

“They’re still running against her and still winning races.”

“…the suspect is from Quebec and has a Canadian passport.”

When the Left lost their way on immigration

Jazz Shaw Jun 21, 2017 2:41 PM

It wasn’t all that long ago, really

“I personally watched some of these students go up to Chief Brown, right up to her face, and call her all kinds of names, cursing at her.”

Did the Queen “nix” a Trump visit to London?

Jazz Shaw Jun 21, 2017 12:41 PM

More like wishful thinking on the American left

Sometimes it’s hard. This was the hardest part

Did the polls get the Handel/Ossoff race wrong?

Allahpundit Jun 21, 2017 11:21 AM


Physician, heal thyself

Maybe we’ll stay home and watch.

Good lack of work if you can get it

GOP takes 2 more special House races, meaning what?

Andrew Malcolm Jun 21, 2017 8:41 AM

Two more demoralizing moral victories for Dems.

Not a murder, but nearly as awful

GA Election results thread Update: Handel wins!

John Sexton Jun 20, 2017 7:10 PM

Late night?

7 p.m. ET: The election to end all elections

Allahpundit Jun 20, 2017 7:01 PM


Dashcam footage: The shooting of Philando Castile

Allahpundit Jun 20, 2017 6:31 PM

“Sir, I have to tell you that I do have a firearm on me.”