Green Room

Anti-Obama billboards could be harmful to the GOP’s health

posted at 1:12 pm on August 31, 2012 by

Thursday’s acceptance speech by Mitt Romney made it official. Romney is now the GOP candidate for president heading into the 2012 election and, as many are now praying fervently, will go on to become the 45th president of the United States. According to the Real Clear Politics average released on Friday, the answer to that prayer is now in hailing distance. Obama’s lead over the GOP hopeful is 0.5%—the smallest its been so far in the election.

Polls are, of course, fickle. The bump reflected in the RCP average is likely to diminish, and the DNC is equally likely to give the Obama-Biden ticket a slight uptick, especially with Democrat idol Bill Clinton taking Joe Biden’s spot in the roster of speeches.

One of the states that is firmly in the Democrats’ column is Massachusetts. Why, therefore, should it matter in the least that a local resident of the sleepy town of Hanson (pop. 10,209) has erected a couple of anti-Obama billboards that many will find distasteful? First, because Barack Obama—despite having once decried the unfortunate tendency of politicians to “make a big election about small things”—has made the exclusive focus of the current election minutiae. His campaign has ridiculed Mitt Romney for everything from strapping a crate containing the family dog to the roof of his car to his wife’s owning a horse that competed in the Olympics. His handlers are certain to point to the billboards as evidence of the “sort of people who want to regain control of the nation’s leadership.”

Second, the mainstream media has already smelled blood in the water. On Thursday CBS Boston ran the first of what are certain to be many TV stories on the billboards, one of which features a young child flipping Obama the bird. (The second shows a picture of Obama and is captioned “Somewhere in Kenya a village is missing its idiot.”) 

The billboards are likely to breathe new life into the specious argument that Obama has been subject to more mean-spirited attacks by his critics than any previous president. The illogical conclusions to be drawn—that he deserves a second term because people were mean to him or that all of this is rooted in racism—will be left to voters, many of whom sadly will take the bait.

One legitimate criticism that has been raised is wholly independent of the intent of the ads. It is to the billboard showing a child making an obscene gesture, which many (including this writer) find exploitative.

Some residents of Hanson have asked Robert Sullivan, who is responsible for the signs, to take them down. One resident told news radio station WBZ “It’s being offensive. I think you can send out the message without being this drastic.” Sullivan’s attorney has countered that the signs are protected under his client’s First Amendment’s rights.

That is true. But the fact that the Constitution protects peoples’ right to say what they want doesn’t mean that they should. Bear in mind that the Supreme Court found the actions and words of the Westboro Baptist Church are covered by the group’s free speech rights.

The Hanson story is one of many that are circulating around the web. Another news video about a billboard near Dallas was posted to YouTube last week. Unlike the others, the Hanson story seems to have legs. If Robert Sullivan is really earnest about seeing Obama ousted from office, he might want to think seriously about removing the billboards.

Related Articles

Follow me on Twitter or join me at Facebook. You can also reach me at [email protected].

Recently in the Green Room:



Trackback URL


Howard let me say that anyone who tells you they re-voted for Obama because some single billboard was nasty to Obama is likely lying to you. People (including myself) give excuses for how they voted and Obama voters can’t say they voted for his record and they can’t say they voted for him for selfish reasons like I want my government check because that invites criticism.

Time to stop worrying about such lame excuses and lame media stories designed to besmirch Republicans because they don’t stop no matter what you try unless you want to live in a police state.

Conan on August 31, 2012 at 1:36 PM

If the billboards don’t inflame Oblamo and his lap dog MSM, then they’ll find something else to be offended about. Don’t sweat it.

rpjkw11 on August 31, 2012 at 1:41 PM

Conan on August 31, 2012 at 1:36 PM

It’s not the billboard per se but what Team Obama will do with it.

Howard Portnoy on August 31, 2012 at 1:47 PM

The Obama campaign and Democrats in general piled vile abuse on President Bush prior to the 2008 campaign and it didn’t seem to hurt his numbers. President Obama himself has been very disrespectful of others during his entire presidency. Those opposing his ideas are either evil or stupid.

That being said, I don’t like billboards with young children flipping anyone the bird. That’s out of bounds and I agree, it’s not helping the cause.

NoDonkey on August 31, 2012 at 1:48 PM

It’s not the billboard per se but what Team Obama will do with it.

Howard Portnoy on August 31, 2012 at 1:47 PM

It won’t matter. I think it would only fuel the notion of Obama: The Great Divider. How can he use it to say he’s uniting us? I seriously doubt his re-election will come down to two billboards.

Turtle317 on August 31, 2012 at 1:56 PM

when you’re trying to win independent and moderate voters, these childish signs are not helpful.

burserker on August 31, 2012 at 2:13 PM

OK, I will grant that there is a line of good taste that it would be counterproductive to cross. One can conceive that having a child flipping off Obama may be on the other side of that line. But anything short of that is fair game. This is not [I hope] the McCain campaign, where we compete to make nice on the enemies of our country [and I mean that literally]. The “other” sign? Go for it. Kenyan village idiot? sure. So far, one of my favorite signs is the billboard that says “Pray for Obama. Psalms 109:8”. And I am pretty sure that most of the enemy would not know the verse, or how to look it up. For myself, I would have put “8-14”.

But we are at war. Ridiculing the enemy is not only fair game, but it is good tactics. Ask Clint Eastwood.

In fact, tomorrow I have to give a presentation to a TEA Party group. There may be an empty chair visible.

Subotai Bahadur

Subotai Bahadur on September 1, 2012 at 1:33 AM