Green Room

Obama WH gave orders in 2011 not to enforce law against Occupy protestors

posted at 12:52 pm on August 8, 2012 by

In an interview published in the August edition of the magazine Black Enterprise, President Obama was asked to respond to criticism that his administration hasn’t done enough to support black businesses. His answer in part was “I’m not the president of black America. I’m the president of the United States of America.”

The statement is obviously intended to recall his groundbreaking speech at the 2004 Democratic convention in which he declared that “there is not a liberal America and a conservative America—there is the United States of America. There is not a Black America and a White America and Latino America and Asian America—there’s the United States of America.”

Those words have proven hollow to those who have opposed the president’s efforts to “remake America” and especially the Tea Party, whom he accused of racial bias in early 2011, calling the movement part of a “subterranean agenda” designed to stir up anger and anxiety at having a black president.

The Occupy movement, in contrast, at least at first, struck the president as all that was good and right about America and the freedom to dissent. On Oct. 6, 2011, he publicly acknowledged that the protesters’ message “expresses frustrations American people feel.” A week later, he went “all in,” formally aligning himself with the movement. Senior campaign adviser David Plouffe announced in an interview:

We intend to make [the anti-Wall Street anger] one of the central elements of the campaign next year. One of the main elements of the contrast will be that the president passed Wall Street reform and our opponent and the other party want to repeal it.

I’m pretty confident 12 months from now, as people make the decision about who to go vote for, the gut check is going to be about, ‘Who would make decisions more about helping my life than Wall Street?’

Ultimately, the Occupiers made it clear that the Obama administration was part of the problem, not the solution, and the White House withdrew its support. But not, it turns out, before the administration had ordered officials with the General Services Administration (GSA) to “stand down” and not arrest Occupy Portland protestors who may have broken the law.

Judicial Watch reports having obtained records from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) via a Nov. 11, 2011 Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request that include internal DHS correspondence. An e-mail exchange between DHS/National Protection and Programs Directorate Chief of Staff Caitlin Durkovich and GSA Public Buildings Service Commissioner Robert Peck (since fired) specifically address Occupy Portland protests taking place on federal property in Portland. On Nov. 6, Durkovich wrote:

I am sorry to be emailing you on a Sunday night, but wanted to let you know our Press Shop has received a couple of calls from Portland media outlets about a group of 11 protesters who again set up camp at Terry Shrunk Plaza in Portland last night. They have chained themselves to a large drum filled with concrete. GSA controls the permits and has asked FPS [Federal Protective Services] not to enforce the curfew at park and the prohibition on overnight encampments. Reporters have asked if we will be arresting the protestors as FPS did last week.

Our FPS Commander in Portland says they are standing down and following GSA’s request to only intervene if there is a threat to public safety.

Peck responded:

Caitlin: yes, that is our position; it’s been vetted with our Administrator and Michael Robertson, our chief of staff, and we have communicated with the WH [White House], which has afforded us the discretion to fashion our approach to Occupy issues…The arrests last week were carried out despite our request that the protesters be allowed to remain and to camp overnight…

The Washington Examiner reports that the Obama White House denied on multiple occasions during last year’s Occupy protests that anyone in the Obama administration had given aid or encouragement to the demonstrators.

Writes Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton:

We now have a new GSA scandal … that involves the Obama White House. These documents clearly show that federal agencies colluded with the Obama White House to allow the Occupy Wall Street protestors to violate the law with impunity. These documents tell us that the GSA and DHS can’t be relied upon to protect federal workers or property.

Related Articles

Follow me on Twitter or join me at Facebook. You can reach me at [email protected] or by posting a comment below.

 

Recently in the Green Room:

Blowback

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Sorry, but this is a non-story. Part of the power Obama has appropriated for himself and the executive branch at large, is the power to arbitrarily refuse to enforce federal laws. See also: DOMA/DADT, immigration law, issuing welfare-to-work waivers, etc.

The Schaef on August 8, 2012 at 1:04 PM

This may be a non-story, but it certainly goes to the heart of the issue: this Administration has no problem blatantly lying to the American press and the American people. Politics trumps everything else with Obama, Gibbs and Carney.

HoosierStateofMind on August 8, 2012 at 1:54 PM

“this Administration has no problem blatantly lying to the American press and the American people”

Something else we’ve known for years.

The Schaef on August 8, 2012 at 5:25 PM

Mass trials, convictions and hangings beginning in Jan 2013…

oh well, I can at least dream about a GOP with spine.

avgjo on August 8, 2012 at 5:37 PM

Sorry, but this is a non-story. Part of the power Obama has appropriated for himself and the executive branch at large, is the power to arbitrarily refuse to enforce federal laws. See also: DOMA/DADT, immigration law, issuing welfare-to-work waivers, etc.

The Schaef on August 8, 2012 at 1:04 PM

Pretty much this. Obama opting to not enforce laws against members of his own voting bloc? He may be corrupt, but he’s certainly not stupid. These are the people he needs to file into voting booths en masse and keep him in power. They claim he’s part of the problem but don’t know why, but they would never say that they want him gone. Had these Occupy protesters tails, they would be wagging furiously should Obama see them in the street and smile wistfully in their direction.

mintycrys on August 9, 2012 at 11:20 AM

Caitlin: yes, that is our position; it’s been vetted with our Administrator and Michael Robertson, our chief of staff, and we have communicated with the WH [White House], which has afforded us the discretion to fashion our approach to Occupy issues
—-

Maybe I’m reading that wrong but I take “afforded us the discretion” to mean that the White House left the final judgement up to that department, not that the White House issued a directive to do/not to do anything.

???

Am I missing something

Politricks on August 9, 2012 at 3:48 PM

Mass trials, convictions and hangings beginning in Jan 2013…

avgjo on August 8, 2012 at 5:37 PM

First thing that came to my mind: a civilian militia trying a bunch of welfare rioters, ‘courtroom’ in front of a looted building.

MelonCollie on August 9, 2012 at 10:18 PM


HotAir — Politics, Culture, Media, 2017, Breaking News from a conservative viewpoint
Top Pick

“We will answer them on the field”

Top Pick

Taking it to the limit

Sunday morning talking heads

Jazz Shaw Jun 25, 2017 8:01 AM

Health care and tweeting and Russia, oh my!

Will they stay or will they go?

I can’t imagine what I was thinking when I said that

Rocking the boat majorly

Big government never contracts. It only grows more powerful

It’s only a “ban” until it becomes inconvenient

The decline and fall of Obamacare and the AHCA

Jazz Shaw Jun 24, 2017 8:31 AM

This was all over before it began

Fixing crime in America is a complicated issue

Taylor Millard Jun 23, 2017 8:31 PM

Cops alone won’t solve it.

Victim’s father was President Maduro’s supervisor back when he was a bus driver.

Democrats forgot all about the “era of good feelings”

“Bernie and Jane Sanders have lawyered up.”

“the Judiciary Committee is examining the circumstances surrounding the removal of James Comey.”

Winning isn’t everything. It is the only thing

Trump signs VA reform bill into law

John Sexton Jun 23, 2017 2:41 PM

“What happened was a national disgrace, and yet some of the employees involved in these scandals remained on the payrolls.”

A new era of something.

“…died suddenly in less than a week just after his return to the U.S.”

The shortsightedness of “Denounce and Preserve”

Taylor Millard Jun 23, 2017 12:11 PM

Pragmatism for the sake of pragmatism doesn’t always work.

Perhaps if you threw in a new car?

Gay marriages still growing, but not as fast

Andrew Malcolm Jun 23, 2017 10:31 AM

More, but not as quickly.

Should’ve stuck with the pirate gig. It was working for him

The battle for the rubble of Raqqa is underway

Andrew Malcolm Jun 23, 2017 8:51 AM

Won’t be much left.

Your list of demands is a publicity stunt

“what happened that day was emblematic of a deeply troubling trend among progressives…”

“The jobs are still leaving. Nothing has stopped.”

Bad vendor. Bad! No cookie!

“The Corps is just starting to grapple with the issues the court has identified.”

“So you want me to sing my praises, is that what you’re saying?”

Why would we possibly want that?

“I mean he sold our country to The Russians.”

I could think of someone else you might want to ask about…

“You can ask a hundred people what hate speech is and you get a thousand different answers”

Trump: I never made any recordings of Comey

Allahpundit Jun 22, 2017 2:01 PM

Bluff.

Hackers stole private data from election databases

John Sexton Jun 22, 2017 1:21 PM

“90,000 records stolen by Russian state actors contained drivers license numbers”