Democratic argument that ‘Romney did it first’ is doomed
posted at 2:46 pm on July 2, 2012 by Howard Portnoy
Now that Chief Justice John Roberts, author of the majority (of one) opinion in National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius, has ruled that the ObamaCare is constitutional so long as the T-word is used in place of mandate, some strategists on the left are testing out a “blame Romney” argument.
The argument (which also encompasses the main “it’s-a-penalty, not-a-tax” ploy) goes something like this: If the instrument used to fund the Affordable Care Act is called a tax (and we’re not admitting it is!), then Romney is at least as guilty if not more so than the president because he implemented the same approach in Massachusetts—and he did it first. In fact, since RomneyCare was the model for ObamaCare, the person responsible for the boat load of taxes that will now fall mainly on the shoulders of the American middle class is Romney!
So how likely is this argument to work? If the Democrats could somehow persuade everyone on the right to remain silent between now and the first Tuesday in November, the argument might have a fighting chance. Then again, so far half a million viewers have watched the online version of this fairly compelling ad by the Crossroads GPS super PAC, which focuses on Obama’s repeated promises not to raise taxes on the middle class by so much as a dime.
The other question is who the argument is meant to reach? It is doubtful that voters on the fence are going to care more about a state law that then-Massachusetts Governor Romney signed in 2006 than about a federal law that President Obama signed in 2010 that will affect their lives directly. (Some residents of Massachusetts may be swayed by the argument, but the chance of that solid-blue state going to Romney in November were already pretty remote.)
Those committed to voting for Romney are unlikely to change their vote to Obama on the strength of the argument that Romney is “just as bad.” Some of these voters may choose to stay home on Election Day, but the same is almost certainly true of committed supporters of the president, making it a wash.
If you need an indication of how much of a headache the Supreme Court ruling has been for Team Obama, consider that many of his surrogates are now attempting to change the subject … to the economy. When the Obamans are willing to discussing that lose-lose topic, you know they’re in trouble.
- The Obama legacy: Two messes we have inherited
- Cosmic justice alert: ObamaCare repeal to be mediated using reconciliation
- Should the GOP use the nuclear option to kill ObamaCare?
- John Roberts’ judicial activism and the health care law that time forgot
- Shared sacrifice: Cutting ObamaCare could save $2 trillion
- ObamaCare, the great job killer
- Why ObamaCare needs to be repealed, not tweaked
- It’s alive! Individual mandate upheld by SCOTUS (sort of)
- DNC executive director not only spikes football, but uses profanity
- New survey: 65% of doctors say healthcare quality will decline under ObamaCare
- Poll: 13% of Americans approve of the health care law as written
- Obama’s ‘gotcha’ moment reveals his ignorance of the law
Recently in the Green Room:
- Sunday reflection: Matthew 4:1-11
- Rand Paul wins CPAC straw poll
- Real question: Does Obama’s budget fund overseas abortions to protect endangered animals?
- Photo of the day: Crimea now belongs to Russia, at least on Russian propaganda TV
- Vatican: Pope Francis wasn’t talking about same-sex relationships; Update: “Civil unions” explained