Green Room

It’s alive! Individual mandate upheld by SCOTUS (sort of)

posted at 11:24 am on June 28, 2012 by

At 10 o’clock on Thursday, June 28, the nation held its collective breath as the Supreme Court began reading its rulings for June. ObamaCare was number three on the docket, after United States v. Alvarez, which held that it is permissible for a current or former member of the armed forces to lie about receiving a medal.

At 10:08, the opinion everyone was waiting for came down. Crowds milling outside the high court and television viewers alike were told that the individual mandate had been struck down. Within minutes, that reading had been revised. A split 5-4 decision held that the individual mandate is constitutional, but as a tax. The swing vote turned out to belong to Chief Justice John Roberts, who sided with the left-leaning justices. Justice Anthony Kennedy voted with the conservative minority.

On Tuesday, Speaker John Boehner warned his House colleagues not to spike the ball if the ruling went Republicans’ way. Rest assured that President Obama will do precisely that when he speaks on the ruling, which is scheduled to happen shortly. He will almost certainly praise the court—which he assailed three short months ago as an “unelected group of people” guilty of “judicial activism”—for its infinite wisdom and restraint.

His jubilation, however, may be premature—and short-lived. The line in the sand between the two factions has become etched more deeply with today’s ruling, which throws up new obstacles for the administration and Democrats.

One major hurdle that the president must now contend with is his repeated insistence in 2009 that the individual mandate was not a tax. In September of that year, ABC’s George Stephanopoulos put this question to Obama: “Under this mandate, the government is forcing people to spend money, fining you if you don’t. How is that not a tax?” Here is a transcript of the exchange that followed:

Obama: Well, hold on a second, George. Here—here’s what’s happening. You and I are both paying $900, on average—our families—in higher premiums because of uncompensated care. Now what I’ve said is that if you can’t afford health insurance, you certainly shouldn’t be punished for that. That’s just piling on. If, on the other hand, we’re giving tax credits, we’ve set up an exchange, you are now part of a big pool, we’ve driven down the costs, we’ve done everything we can and you actually can afford health insurance, but you’ve just decided, you know what, I want to take my chances. And then you get hit by a bus and you and I have to pay for the emergency room care, that’s…

Stephanopoulos: That may be, but it’s still a tax increase.

Obama: No. That’s not true, George. The—for us to say that you’ve got to take a responsibility to get health insurance is absolutely not a tax increase. What it’s saying is, is that we’re not going to have other people carrying your burdens for you anymore than the fact that right now everybody in America, just about, has to get auto insurance. Nobody considers that a tax increase. People say to themselves, that is a fair way to make sure that if you hit my car, that I’m not covering all the costs.

Stephanopoulos: But it may be fair, it may be good public policy…

Obama: No, but—but, George, you—you can’t just make up that language and decide that that’s called a tax increase. Any…

Stephanopoulos: Here’s the…

Obama: What—what—if I—if I say that right now your premiums are going to be going up by 5% or 8% or 10% next year and you say well, that’s not a tax increase; but, on the other hand, if I say that I don’t want to have to pay for you not carrying coverage even after I give you tax credits that make it affordable, then…

Stephanopoulos: I—I don’t think I’m making it up. Merriam Webster’s Dictionary: Tax—”a charge, usually of money, imposed by authority on persons or property for public purposes.”

Obama: George, the fact that you looked up Merriam’s Dictionary, the definition of tax increase, indicates to me that you’re stretching a little bit right now. Otherwise, you wouldn’t have gone to the dictionary to check on the definition. I mean what…

Stephanopoulos: Well, no, but…

Obama: …what you’re saying is…

Stephanopoulos: I wanted to check for myself. But your critics say it is a tax increase.

Obama: My critics say everything is a tax increase. My critics say that I’m taking over every sector of the economy. You know that. Look, we can have a legitimate debate about whether or not we’re going to have an individual mandate or not, but…

Stephanopoulos: But you reject that it’s a tax increase?

Obama: I absolutely reject that notion.

In addition, the court’s decision was unequivocal in its finding that Congress had overstepped its authority in writing this legislation, emphasizing that the individual mandate as a non-tax vehicle was beyond the scope of the Commerce Clause. Its and Obama’s overreach are sure to become a GOP talking point.

Finally, there is the matter of ObamaCare’s abiding unpopularity. For nearly the duration of its existence, the law has been opposed by a majority of voters. A plurality of voters also want to see the law repealed.

Today’s ruling is not likely to alter either of those sentiments. Nor will it change the perception, put forth in recent days by liberal pundits, that Obama squandered the first half of his term as president pushing for passage of the health care law when his sights should have been set on rescuing the economy.

The fight is just getting underway.

Related Articles

Follow me on Twitter or join me at Facebook. You can reach me at [email protected] or by posting a comment below.


Follow me on Twitter or join me at Facebook. You can reach me at [email protected] or by posting a comment below.

Recently in the Green Room:



Trackback URL


The fight is just getting underway.

I hope you’re right about that. I so desperately hope that you are. But my gut feeling is that this fight is over, and we lost.

Mr. Prodigy on June 28, 2012 at 12:07 PM

Roberts…crazy like a fox. Now everyone knows its a tax, as we’ve been saying since we shouted at our tv’s in the beginning.

I hate the outcome. I wish they had struck it down as unconstitutional. Under the commerce clause, it was unconstitutional. As a tax, it’s fair game.

How does that tax feel to you, Democrats? Just as warm and fuzzy as it does to the rest of us?

Why do people hate liberty? Where does this fear come from? Not having husbands? Fathers? Is that it? *spits*

winoceros on June 28, 2012 at 12:16 PM

The SCOTUS ruled 1) that individual mandates of ANY non-commerce activities are beyond the scope of the Commerce Clause, and 2) that the mandate is a TAX.

Doesn’t this decision open the door to lawsuits regarding all kinds of mandated activity regarding non-commerce activity (ie mandating that you withhold a portion of your income for Social Security and Medicaid?)

Also, now that SCOTUS ruled it was a tax, the GOP can say that Obama has raised everybody’s taxes.

Seems like the libs didn’t get what they wanted after all.

For this to truly be a win, the SCOTUS would have to rule that it is constitutional under the Commerce Clause, and we all knew that wasn’t going to happen.

conservablogger on June 28, 2012 at 12:44 PM

The fight is just getting underway.


Nobody saw this result coming. And it couldn’t have come out better for republicans if it was scripted that way.

The dems think they won today.

cozmo on June 28, 2012 at 1:08 PM

conservablogger on June 28, 2012 at 12:44 PM

And, there are no provisions in the current 0bamacare about collecting those taxes.

That part of the law (funding) will have to be revisited.

cozmo on June 28, 2012 at 1:09 PM

The fight is just getting underway.


Nobody saw this result coming. And it couldn’t have come out better for republicans if it was scripted that way.

The dems think they won today.

The dems did win today. They won a huge battle today. It’s up to us to make sure they ultimately lose the war. If the Demonrat party is not utterly destroyed, the country will be

john1v6 on June 28, 2012 at 1:20 PM

john1v6 on June 28, 2012 at 1:20 PM

And that’s the way it should be.

cozmo on June 28, 2012 at 1:26 PM

You know, I just read a link from HA’s front page that there is a rumor that Roberts originally was going to rule against Obamacare, and then was pressured to do what he did today.

I wonder what they had on him?

You know, the closer I look at him, the more he reminds me of that creep senator from ‘The Last Boy Scout’…

avgjo on June 28, 2012 at 1:44 PM

If Roberts really did change his decision due to political pressure, he should resign at the beginning of next year. He’s a disgrace to the Court and a coward. That Kennedy even realized how unconstitutional this bill was shows how delusional Roberts decision was.

njrob on June 28, 2012 at 2:11 PM

Stop wasting energy on Roberts’ infantile threading of the needle, and start working where it will do some good.

Difficultas_Est_Imperium on June 28, 2012 at 2:13 PM

Difficultas, the problem is that Robert’s ‘infantile threading of the needle’ (well put, by the way) is that he has given Congress carte blanche to control any aspect of our lives with taxes. It will take time to work our way through that intellectually. It is important to do so because we have to now strategize around this.

avgjo on June 28, 2012 at 2:26 PM

I hate both Obama and Roberts because they are taking health care away from our disabled child. If we cannot get rid of both Obummer and this horrible law soon my husband and I are going to spend our retirement years in poverty because we will have to spend all our savings paying cash to doctors so our disabled child can get the health care she needs. We are not rich so eventually we will run out of money for medical care and I don’t know what we will do then. Many people don’t know this but Obummer is planning to cancel the Tricare military health insurance program and throw us all into the exchanges in 2014. It will be as if my husband had never served and earned health benefits from the military.

I’m a pharmacist who would be very opposed to Obummercare even if I had no children. It will destroy the patients’ medical privacy in addition to rationing care. My husband and I are both shocked and deeply saddened by this decision. Our child is also very upset because she is old enough to understand what this means and she is frightened for her future. I now have no respect for the court or for our government. We are not a free country anymore but a dictatorship.

sherrimae on June 28, 2012 at 9:23 PM

HotAir — Politics, Culture, Media, 2017, Breaking News from a conservative viewpoint

McConnell may not get his wish on health care vote

Taylor Millard Jun 25, 2017 7:31 PM
Top Pick

Senate leadership wants a vote this week, others say, “Negative, Ghost Rider.”

Top Pick

Helping others without the government.

“…the reality is the reality.”

These kiosks don’t make $15 per hour or need benefits

Going for the record

“We will answer them on the field”

Taking it to the limit

Sunday morning talking heads

Jazz Shaw Jun 25, 2017 8:01 AM

Health care and tweeting and Russia, oh my!

Will they stay or will they go?

I can’t imagine what I was thinking when I said that

Rocking the boat majorly

Big government never contracts. It only grows more powerful

It’s only a “ban” until it becomes inconvenient

The decline and fall of Obamacare and the AHCA

Jazz Shaw Jun 24, 2017 8:31 AM

This was all over before it began

Fixing crime in America is a complicated issue

Taylor Millard Jun 23, 2017 8:31 PM

Cops alone won’t solve it.

Victim’s father was President Maduro’s supervisor back when he was a bus driver.

Democrats forgot all about the “era of good feelings”

“Bernie and Jane Sanders have lawyered up.”

“the Judiciary Committee is examining the circumstances surrounding the removal of James Comey.”

Winning isn’t everything. It is the only thing

Trump signs VA reform bill into law

John Sexton Jun 23, 2017 2:41 PM

“What happened was a national disgrace, and yet some of the employees involved in these scandals remained on the payrolls.”

A new era of something.

“…died suddenly in less than a week just after his return to the U.S.”

The shortsightedness of “Denounce and Preserve”

Taylor Millard Jun 23, 2017 12:11 PM

Pragmatism for the sake of pragmatism doesn’t always work.

Perhaps if you threw in a new car?

Gay marriages still growing, but not as fast

Andrew Malcolm Jun 23, 2017 10:31 AM

More, but not as quickly.

Should’ve stuck with the pirate gig. It was working for him

The battle for the rubble of Raqqa is underway

Andrew Malcolm Jun 23, 2017 8:51 AM

Won’t be much left.

Your list of demands is a publicity stunt

“what happened that day was emblematic of a deeply troubling trend among progressives…”

“The jobs are still leaving. Nothing has stopped.”

Bad vendor. Bad! No cookie!

“The Corps is just starting to grapple with the issues the court has identified.”

“So you want me to sing my praises, is that what you’re saying?”

Why would we possibly want that?

“I mean he sold our country to The Russians.”

I could think of someone else you might want to ask about…