Green Room

Obama campaign spokeswoman: CBS/NYT(!) poll unfavorable to Obama is ‘biased’

posted at 12:44 pm on May 15, 2012 by

How can you tell when a poll is biased or uses flawed methodology? That’s easy. If the findings are unfavorable to the Obama administration or his chances for re-election, the poll can be written off as fantastical.

And we are not just talking FOX News surveys, which everyone knows are absurdly skewed. We’re talking a CBS/New York Times poll.

This was essentially the claim made by Obama campaign deputy manager Stephanie Cutter, who was interviewed by NBC’s Chuck Todd on MSNBC on Tuesday (h/t The Examiner). The subject was a newly released CBS/New York Times survey that asked whether the president’s recent “coming out” as a supporter of same-sex marriage was motivated by politics or by a sincere belief in the righteousness of these unions. Of the 615 adults queried, 67% saw the move as politically expedient, 24% as sincere.

Seeing is believing. In this clip from the program, Todd concedes that the methodology of the poll, which was a callback, was different from the normal procedure. Yet, he notes, “Put[ting] those caveats aside, that’s a lot of people saying that he did this for political reasons.”

Cutter’s response: “We can’t put the methodology of that poll aside, because the methodology was significantly biased.”

Todd goes on to emphasize that the margin was 3 to 1 and asks whether Cutter believes the poll was so biased that the numbers would be reversed if the poll were recast. Her answer—a non-answer really—is that she doesn’t want to bore the viewers with a conservation on methodology.

Related Articles

Follow me on Twitter or join me at Facebook. You can reach me at howard.portnoy@gmail.com or by posting a comment below.

Recently in the Green Room:

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

I’ve posted this elsewhere, but Real Clear Politics is falling in line with this meme. RCP has dropped this poll from its average, moving Obama from +1.6 to +2.2. I am not sure what to make of it. The internals of the poll were certainly not biased: D+6 before weighting, D+3 after weighting. I know of no reason that a callback poll should be biased. RCP has included much more questionable polls in the past.

topdog on May 15, 2012 at 1:05 PM

Isn’t that the normal progressive thinking — if it isn’t what we want, then it’s flawed?

sadatoni on May 15, 2012 at 2:27 PM

Obviously racist. Oh wait, by definition, liberals cannot be racist – my bad!

tballard on May 16, 2012 at 1:11 AM

a conservation conversation on methodology

FIFY

stevehorth on May 16, 2012 at 1:17 PM

stevehorth on May 16, 2012 at 1:17 PM

Thank you.

Howard Portnoy on May 16, 2012 at 4:20 PM