SEALs slam Obama for taking credit for bin Laden raid
posted at 10:55 am on May 3, 2012 by Howard Portnoy
Nothing belies the president’s claim that he is not using the bin Laden killing as a political football more than his shameless interview with NBC News on Wednesday inside the White House Situation Room. The alleged purpose of this rare behind-the-scenes look was to show the American people “where it all went down” in May of 2011. The problem for the president is that the real place “where it all went down” is half a world away, in Abbottābad, Pakistan.
That is what current and former U.S. Navy SEALs are now saying in an effort to set the record straight. In interviews with the Mail Online, some half dozen servicemen have spoken up to suggest the president was out of line in his recent boast that “I said that I’d go after bin Laden if we had a clear shot at him, and I did.”
One of them, veteran Navy Commander Ryan Zinke, told the Mail:
The decision was a no brainer. I applaud him for making it but I would not overly pat myself on the back for making the right call.
I think every president would have done the same. He is justified in saying it was his decision but the preparation, the sacrifice—it was a broader team effort.
Zinke, who is now a Republican state senator in Montana, added that Obama was exploiting bin Laden’s death for his re-election bid: “The President and his administration are positioning him as a war president using the SEALs as ammunition. It was predictable.”
An active member of the SEAL Team is franker in his criticism, telling the Mail:
Obama wasn’t in the field, at risk, carrying a gun. As president, at every turn he should be thanking the guys who put their lives on the line to do this. He does so in his official speeches because his speechwriters are smart.
But the more he tries to take the credit for it, the more the ground operators are saying, ‘Come on, man!’ It really didn’t matter who was president. At the end of the day, they were going to go.
Another former SEAL, Chris Kyle, notes:
The operation itself was great and the nation felt immense pride. It was great that we did it.
But bin Laden was just a figurehead. The war on terror continues. Taking him out didn’t really change anything as far as the war on terror is concerned and using it as a political attack is a cheap shot.
In years to come there is going to be information that will come out that Obama was not the man who made the call. He can say he did and the people who really know what happened are inside the Pentagon, are in the military and the military isn’t allowed to speak out against the commander-in-chief so his secret is safe.
Kyle adds, “He’s trying to say that Romney wouldn’t have made the same call? Anyone who is patriotic to this country would have made that exact call, Democrat or Republican. Obama is taking more credit than he is due but it’s going to get him some pretty good mileage.”
Ultimately, the 2012 election is far more likely to turn on the economy than it is on foreign policy. But as for the take-down of bin Laden, I believe that Obama’s recent bout of braggadocio will diminish his role in that operation the eyes of many Americans. This American wrote on May 2, 2011:
Regardless of your political leanings or feelings toward the current administration, one undeniable winner is President Obama. Osama bin Laden met his maker on Obama’s watch and under his leadership. The president revealed last night that the first actionable intelligence on bin Laden’s whereabouts came across his desk last August. He used deliberation as commander-in-chief and waited until the time was ripe, then acted decisively—and was victorious. No American service members were harmed in the attack, which successfully neutralized the primary target. If it were not bitterly ironic to do so, the White House might be draped today in a banner reading ‘Mission accomplished.’
I even went on in that article to extol his speech following the raid as one of his best. Today I went back and reviewed the video of that speech, and Obama’s words now seem hollow and self-serving.
It would have been well if Obama had taken his own best advice about “not spiking the ball.” Instead he has done precisely that, demonstrating once again that when it comes to playing ball, he is all small ball and nothing else.
Related Articles
- Can Obama really use his foreign policy record to help him win in November?
- Fear factor: Are Republicans afraid of Obama’s ‘coolness’?
- The audacity of Obama campaigning on having ‘bagged bin Laden’
- Correction: Obama IS too cool to joke about
- Obama attempting to ‘get his groove back’ with young voters
- Obama sets tone for election with joke about Romney’s stiffness
- Allen West to Obama et al: ‘Get the hell out of America’
- Poll: Americans say growing the economy more important than reducing wealth gap
- Poll: No one is more admired than Obama
- Shock poll: 48% of white blue-collar Dems oppose renominating Obama
- Poll: 1 in 4 Dems want someone other than Obama as their candidate
- The death of OBL: Whose victory?
Follow me on Twitter or join me at Facebook. You can reach me at howard.portnoy@gmail.com or by posting a comment below.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
So why is he running on an “I got Bin Laden” platform? It’s almost as if he has nothing else to run on. Oh, wait, he doesn’t.
rbj on May 3, 2012 at 11:14 AM
Too many I’s to stomach
cmsinaz on May 3, 2012 at 11:33 AM
Obam is the modern day Rambo
ObamatheMessiah on May 3, 2012 at 11:44 AM
I feel sort of sorry for Barry Obambo, I know that in Vietnam they trusted him with a 2 million dollar chopper but when he got back here to the world he couldn’t even keep a job at a car wash…..
if only Brian Dennehy had just let Barry Obambo keep walkin’….
harlekwin15 on May 3, 2012 at 11:49 AM
The truth will eventually be common knowledge. The truth that Obama’s role in this was to mechanically give the go ahead, because a president must do that. The truth that any president would have done the same.
But that may not happen before November 2012, and that is all that matters to Obama and the Dems.
The only people who can deflate the deliberately overinflated fantasy about Obama’s role are members of the Defense Department, past and present, including those presently or formerly in uniform. Those presently serving cannot do it. Hopefully those formerly in positions to know will speak up louder and more often.
farsighted on May 3, 2012 at 11:53 AM
That 2 May 2011 Obama speech in the immediate aftermath of the Bin Laden raid is revealing. I *think* his speechwriters — and let’s face it, speechwriters wrote his remarks — were actually trying for an Eisenhoweresque “Any failure would accrue to me alone.” Instead, they wrote a Trumanesque “It was *my* responsibility; the buck stops here,” forgetting that what made Eisenhower great and beloved was that he DIDN’T take the credit, he gave it exclusively to his men.
They also forget what an emphasis Obama always puts on the word “I” when he speaks. “I *think* x” is a normal person’s speech pattern; “*I* think x” is Obama.
Just think how differently Obama would be regarded if in his speech on 2 May 11, the 4th through 6th paragraphs were replaced by “Based on long and painstaking work by the unsung heroes of our intelligence community, a force of Navy Seals boldly raided a secret compound in Pakistan and killed Osama Bin Laden after a brief firefight. We suffered no casualties. On behalf of all Americans, I honor the men and women who made this success possible, and give you the thanks of a grateful nation.” And then sat down.
Zumkopf on May 3, 2012 at 12:23 PM
small balls. fify
Kissmygrits on May 3, 2012 at 5:57 PM