Green Room

Forward

posted at 9:51 am on May 1, 2012 by

By now you’ve probably heard the Obama campaign has decided on a new campaign slogan.

The word “Forward” has been chosen for … yeah, I don’t know. We’ve done anything but move forward under this administration. Perhaps it should have been “Okay Now Let’s Try To Go Forward”. Right, too awkward.

The Washington Times notes that the slogan has long ties to socialism:

The Obama campaign apparently didn’t look backwards into history when selecting its new campaign slogan, “Forward” — a word with a long and rich association with European Marxism.

Many Communist and radical publications and entities throughout the 19th and 20th centuries had the name “Forward!” or its foreign cognates….

The slogan “Forward!” reflected the conviction of European Marxists and radicals that their movements reflected the march of history, which would move forward past capitalism and into socialism and communism.

Ann Althouse notes it also has long tiesto … Wisconsin?

“Forward” is the Wisconsin state motto, and I’ve heard it used over and over again by politicians.

Whatever.

One has to assume that “forward” is meant mean to start in a particular direction from the point you now occupy. And that’s where it gets dicey for Obama. What is the point we now occupy from which he’d like to move us “forward”?

Well, shall we make a list to help his campaign?

-Forward to an unemployment rate lower than 8.2% (oh, wait, that was the job of the stimulus.)

-Forward from the first ever credit downgrade (a unique first for a president, no?)

-Forward toward a total debt that is less than our GDP (yeah, that’s not going to happen.)

-Forward toward more government (it does solve all our problems, right? Right?)

-Forward toward more executive “we can’t afford to wait” orders (because now an imperial presidency is a ‘good thing’).

-Forward to more green energy boondoggles (at taxpayers expense, of course.)

-Forward to even less fossil fuel exploitation on federal lands (because, you know, fossil fuel is a fuel of the past.)

-Forward to implementing unconstitutional mandates (if ObamaCare survives, what can’t government mandate?)

-Forward to even more Americans on food stamps (a record to be proud of?)

-Forward to another 4 years of poor leadership (like putting pressure on the Senate to pass a budget? Oh, wait …)

-Forward to another ‘reset’ with our international allies (because they feel so loved right now.)

-Forward to a DoJ that’s even worse than it is now (Fast and Furious? You ain’t seen nothing yet.)

-Forward to a president no longer answerable to the people (you know, one with more “flexibility”.)

-Forward toward a possibility of making additional Supreme Court appointments (frightening to anyone who values liberty).

-Forward with a president who identifies with the values the OWS crowd (just review his record if you don’t get that.)

-Forward with the push to tax “global warming” (its about revenue, not science.)

-Forward with the class warfare “equality” campaign (it means ‘redistribution’, see identification with OWS)

-Forward with other redistributionist schemes (Student loans anyone?)

-Forward with more divisive partisanship from the most partisan president ever (ask Paul Ryan about that.)

-Forward from 2.2% GDP growth and a jobless recovery (ignore the jobs more oil drilling could bring immediately.)

Yes, I know, a partial list (I’m sure you can add to it), but I need to move on.

“Forward”.

I like it. Of course, it’s probably not a good thing when those who want you out of office like you’re new slogan. They probably have an ulterior motive for doing so (yup, that’d be me).

Any bets on whether or not it will be quietly retired soon in favor of another? I mean I’m sure the focus groups loved it, but really? Forward?

This is a bit like the Chernobyl town council declaring “forward” as their slogan after the melt down.

The three headed frogs all liked it.

~McQ

Twitter: @McQandO

Recently in the Green Room:

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

maybe we co-opt it and release bumper stickers with “FROWARD” …. only problem is most libs would just think we didn’t know how to spell…

LARR
USN – RET

Larr on May 1, 2012 at 10:24 AM

Forward from the disaster we’re currently in? That would entail a change of leadership. Not only is the theme implicitly marxist, it’s implicitly a call for a new president.

rbj on May 1, 2012 at 10:25 AM

Greg Gutfeld on Red Eye had the most plausible explanation – forward has one O so they can use the awesome O-logo.

NeoDawg on May 1, 2012 at 10:25 AM

Why let 0bama have exclusive rights to “Forward”?

-Forward, to an administration that will begin to repair the damage 0bama has done.

cozmo on May 1, 2012 at 10:28 AM

Odd ‘Forward’ on most tape and dvd device players points to the ‘Right’.

hehe.

orbitalair on May 1, 2012 at 10:55 AM

Greg Gutfeld on Red Eye had the most plausible explanation – forward has one O so they can use the awesome O-logo.

NeoDawg on May 1, 2012 at 10:25 AM

meh, like this AWESOM-O ???
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AWESOM-O

hmm, are ‘we’ Butters in that picture??? hehe.

orbitalair on May 1, 2012 at 10:58 AM

Well at least they’re coming partially out of the socialist closet by using a historically Marxist slogan. Of course most Dem voters aren’t educated enough (versus indoctrinated) to recognize that.

dentarthurdent on May 1, 2012 at 11:26 AM

Romney’s campaign slogan should be “UPWARD!”

J.E. Dyer on May 1, 2012 at 12:31 PM

This is a bit like the Chernobyl town council declaring “forward” as their slogan after the melt down.

Just a note for historical accuracy, Bruce. Chernobyl was the nuclear plant, but the town closest to the plant where all the plant workers lived was Pripyat.

gravityman on May 1, 2012 at 12:42 PM

Just a note for historical accuracy, Bruce. Chernobyl was the nuclear plant, but the town closest to the plant where all the plant workers lived was Pripyat.

See, the three-headed frogs would have known that. Drat.

Bruce McQuain on May 1, 2012 at 1:00 PM

Forward as in Great Leap Forward?

agmartin on May 1, 2012 at 2:34 PM

Forward–to the imaginary future that didn’t work in the past!

Olo_Burrows on May 1, 2012 at 5:59 PM