Green Room

Place Your Bets: Big Taxpayer Gamble May Be Funded In Part By… Casino Tax Revenues

posted at 4:13 pm on March 30, 2012 by

There are lots of stories about failed “big idea” development programs out there, and Hot Air touches on most of the big national ones. Solyndra in particular is probably the most famous recent member of the failed government-backed enterprise coterie, and while it may not be the only eco-devo disaster on the current Administration’s watch (“per se“), Solyndra holds high the flag of cronyism and beacon of bad government.

But bad government investments aren’t unique to the federal government, and you’ve probably seen similar boondoggle projects crop up in your states, too. We’ve certainly had our share here in Missouri, and if you have any examples of your own, definitely leave them in the comments, or holler at me on Twitter.

Here’s but another story in that vein.

At the Show-Me Institute, we have long-followed one project coursing through the Missouri legislature called “Aerotropolis,” which I’ve talked about in the Green Room before.

What’s an “Aerotropolis”?

The idea is that decades from now, the animating appendage to the most successful cities will be massive international transit hubs combining air, rail and wheels that can get product from manufacturers in, say, China to buyers around the United States. It requires massive inventories of warehouses around the airport to store the product, massive improvements in the airport itself to handle the air carriers, and predictably, massive, massive public subsidies, at least if you’re going to build the thing from scratch on the backs of taxpayers.

It it were a musical, the Aerotropolis project might look something like this:

 

 

After failing spectacularly in the legislature last year, there has been no significant movement on the originally half-billion dollar project in the last few months — that is, until this week.

Two different stories on Aerotropolis are now circulating in Missouri media. (Coincidence? Probably not.) The first came out Tuesday and dealt with efforts in the state legislature to once again drive state tax credits to the project. It looks like House leaders may try to tuck Aerotropolis back into an economic development package that the chamber is preparing.

The second story was published Friday and is the more fascinating of the two. It reveals that Saint Louis County may apply $3 million in casino tax revenues to support the Aerotropolis project. If true, the funding source would certainly be apropos, given that Aerotropolis almost certainly is a huge gamble. Over the last year, Show Me’s Audrey Spalding and I (as well as Chrissy Harbin) have discussed at length the merits (or lack thereof) of Aerotropolis, a project that originally clocked in at a cool $480 million when it was first proposed. That figure is worth keeping in mind as proponents of the Aerotropolis plan pine for state money. Taxpayers have been told that Aerotropolis “needed” a half billion dollars to take flight; then $360 million; and then just $60 million. Maybe Aerotropolis should not receive any money from taxpayers?

This also may be a case of life imitating art, as this Show-Me Institute PSA (narrated by Show-Me’s own Rick Edlund) on tax credits makes clear.

No doubt, a plethora of interest groups are still actively campaigning to resurrect Aerotropolis, but proponents of the boondoggle — as proponents of boondoggles are wont to do — have still failed to make the case that 1) the Aerotropolis plan will work, and 2) public money is required to resolve some market failure standing in the way of the project’s success. Last year, it looked like private parties just wanted to gamble with the public’s money, which for this sort of thing isn’t all that unusual. “A game changer at $480 million! A bargain at $360 million! Just $60 million will do the trick!”

It sounds like we have a problem gambler on our hands. Maybe the best thing to do is to simply cut them off.

Recently in the Green Room:

Blowback


HotAir — Politics, Culture, Media, 2017, Breaking News from a conservative viewpoint
Top Pick

Look on the bright side. There’s less snow in the summer

Top Pick

Big win … but for how long?

“Several Russian cities have unveiled monuments to Stalin in recent months.”

Massive disappointment

Emboldened conservative wing?

It’s more about the powers of the Presidency at this point

A second look at paper ballots?

Jazz Shaw Jun 26, 2017 10:41 AM

Low tech solutions to high tech crime

No extra beatings required, thanks

A “”massive, massive f*** up…”

This is totally amazing!

McConnell may not get his wish on health care vote

Taylor Millard Jun 25, 2017 7:31 PM

Senate leadership wants a vote this week, others say, “Negative, Ghost Rider.”

Helping others without the government.

“…the reality is the reality.”

These kiosks don’t make $15 per hour or need benefits

Going for the record

“We will answer them on the field”

Taking it to the limit

Sunday morning talking heads

Jazz Shaw Jun 25, 2017 8:01 AM

Health care and tweeting and Russia, oh my!

Will they stay or will they go?

I can’t imagine what I was thinking when I said that

Rocking the boat majorly

Big government never contracts. It only grows more powerful

It’s only a “ban” until it becomes inconvenient

The decline and fall of Obamacare and the AHCA

Jazz Shaw Jun 24, 2017 8:31 AM

This was all over before it began

Fixing crime in America is a complicated issue

Taylor Millard Jun 23, 2017 8:31 PM

Cops alone won’t solve it.

Victim’s father was President Maduro’s supervisor back when he was a bus driver.

Democrats forgot all about the “era of good feelings”

“Bernie and Jane Sanders have lawyered up.”

“the Judiciary Committee is examining the circumstances surrounding the removal of James Comey.”

Winning isn’t everything. It is the only thing

Trump signs VA reform bill into law

John Sexton Jun 23, 2017 2:41 PM

“What happened was a national disgrace, and yet some of the employees involved in these scandals remained on the payrolls.”

A new era of something.

“…died suddenly in less than a week just after his return to the U.S.”

The shortsightedness of “Denounce and Preserve”

Taylor Millard Jun 23, 2017 12:11 PM

Pragmatism for the sake of pragmatism doesn’t always work.

Perhaps if you threw in a new car?

Gay marriages still growing, but not as fast

Andrew Malcolm Jun 23, 2017 10:31 AM

More, but not as quickly.

Should’ve stuck with the pirate gig. It was working for him