School refuses to allow preschooler to eat ‘non-nutritious’ lunch from home

posted at 11:36 am on February 15, 2012 by

It’s hard to say which aspect of the story out of Raeford, North Carolina, is the most exasperating. Is it that a 4-year-old was denied permission to eat the lunch she had brought from home because it was declared “non-nutritious” by lunchroom staff? Is it that she was forced to eat a “healthy” school lunch of chicken nuggets instead? Is it that the administration has threatened to pass the cost of the substitute lunch on to the child’s parents who plied her with food that fails to meet “government standards” in the first place? Or is that the government believes its purview includes dictating to citizens what they can and can’t feed their children?

Before you vote, consider the contents of the lunchbox (aka contraband) that the child (whose name has been withheld) attempted to smuggle past food police at West Hoke Elementary School on January 30: A turkey and cheese sandwich, a banana, a container of apple juice, and potato chips.

The Carolina Journal Online, which broke the story, reports:

The Division of Child Development and Early Education at the [State] Department of Health and Human Services requires all lunches served in pre-kindergarten programs—including in-home day care centers—to meet USDA guidelines. That means lunches must consist of one serving of meat, one serving of milk, one serving of grain, and two servings of fruit or vegetables, even if the lunches are brought from home.

But according to the USDA’s MyPlate.gov, the child’s lunch met all of those requirements. Turkey constitutes a serving of protein, cheese one of dairy, the bread slices two of grain, the apple and juice together two of fruit. As for the lone renegade item, the potato chips, state guidelines contain no clear restrictions against including such food in preschoolers’ lunch boxes.

According to Jani Kozlowski, fiscal and statutory policy manager for the division, “If a parent sends their child with a Coke and a Twinkie, the child care provider is going to need to provide a balanced lunch for the child.” She hastens to add that ultimately the provider has no authority to confiscate these items.

Which raises yet another possible source of exasperation in this tale—that the school administrators misapplied USDA guidelines in a manner that could potentially traumatize a young child. The girl’s mother told the Carolina Journal, “You’re telling a 4-year-old, ‘Oh, your lunch isn’t right,’ and she’s thinking there’s something wrong with her food.”

The mother was also irked by the note she received from the school informing her that she might be required to cover the cost of the lunch the school provided her daughter, which in this case was $1.25. She has written a letter of complaint to her state representative, G.L. Pridgen.

Policy Manager Kozlowski believes the policy of charging parents is wrong, adding, “It sounds like maybe a technical assistance need for that school.” If technical assistance is governmentspeak for replacing the food service staff at the school with sentient beings, then I concur.

Related Articles

Follow me on Twitter or join me at Facebook. You can reach me at howard.portnoy@gmail.com or by posting a comment below.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

I would like to see one of these bureaucrats try to force my 3 year old or 1 year old to eat something they don’t like and have it thrown back in their face.

More rule from more people who wouldn’t be caught dead doing anything so icky as raising a child.

NoDonkey on February 15, 2012 at 12:15 PM

And BTW, that lunch the mother made is very nutricious, anyone who disagrees is a complete idiot.

We can’t all afford personal Hollywood chefs to stir our arugula and soy crumpets.

NoDonkey on February 15, 2012 at 12:17 PM

Aren’t chicken nuggets fried? I thought fried food was bad for you.

rbj on February 15, 2012 at 12:49 PM

Imagine a country filled with people who had the government telling them what they are ALLOWED to eat from the age of 3.

What kind of laws/rules/societal structure do you think those people would consider “normal”???

Let that sink in for a minute.

KMC1 on February 15, 2012 at 1:58 PM

The idiot food nazi who did this needs to be fired. Not only did he force a LESS nutritious lunch on the kid, but since she only ate 3 nuggets and didn’t touch her own lunch, she ended up with less food / nutrition than she would have gotten if left to eat her bag lunch.

dentarthurdent on February 15, 2012 at 3:30 PM

Or is that the government believes its purview includes dictating to citizens what they can and can’t feed their children?

It is their purview – when you take government help, you get government help.
That parent already abdicated their parenting responsibilities by sending her 4 yr old to government run babysitting. Taking help from the government always comes with strings, it’s time people woke up to this. If the parent doesn’t want the progressives telling her how to feed her kid she should pull the kid out of the progressive daycare.

batterup on February 16, 2012 at 8:57 AM

batterup on February 16, 2012 at 8:57 AM

Fundamentally I agree with you – BUT – in this case the bag lunch in question actually did meet the USDA guidelines, so the food nazi who did this is incompetent.

dentarthurdent on February 16, 2012 at 10:23 AM

dentarthurdent on February 16, 2012 at 10:23 AM

No the food monitor was competent, she was doing exactly what her purpose is – control – see it’s not about food – it’s about monitoring. The more capricious the decision making is the better for the government.

This is exactly what government controlled healthcare will be like. People need to wake up.

batterup on February 16, 2012 at 2:57 PM

batterup on February 16, 2012 at 2:57 PM

Well from that perspective, yes, I readily concede your point. Everything this corrupt administration does is about controlling us unwashed peons. No argument there….

dentarthurdent on February 16, 2012 at 3:17 PM