‘Food insecure’ Sesame Street Muppet instills fear of hunger in young viewers

posted at 11:23 am on December 11, 2011 by
[ Media ]   

One key difference between liberals and conservatives is that liberals take no prisoners in getting their message out. In November, members of the Occupy Wall Street movement had no qualms about airing their grievances on children, shouting taunts and jeers at 7-year-olds on their way to school.

Now the youngest members of society are under the gun again. This time the attack on childhood is subtler and coming from an august source. Sesame Street, the decades-old PBS show that once taught children to count and spell, is now raising the specter of hunger among its young and impressionable viewers. It is also explaining how when mommy and daddy run out of food, the nanny state can help restock the family larder. CNSNews reports:

A ‘food insecure’ Muppet is helping to promote a national ‘Food for Thought’ campaign that teaches poor families to seek out nutritious food and to eat on the taxpayers’ tab.

At the National Press Club on Thursday, Lily the Muppet—who worries about her family not having enough money to feed her properly—pitched free food at school:

‘Sometimes we can’t always afford to buy all the food that we need,’ Lily said. ‘I mean, but we’ve been finding lots of ways that we can get help.…Yeah, for example, at school I get a free breakfast and a lunch … part of the meal plan.”

The article goes on to quote Rev. Douglas Greenaway of the National WIC (Women, Infants and Children) Association, who not only praised ‘Food For Thought’ but allowed as how the campaign “is really a deficit reduction strategy, and we hope policymakers will take notice of that.”

The good reverend didn’t elaborate on how spending taxpayer money, never mind how beneficent the goal, reduces the deficit. Maybe he was channeling Obama Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack, who intriguingly proclaimed that food stamps create jobs.

Lily’s message, meanwhile, is being circulated in schools, hospitals, and food assistance programs via a multimedia campaign. Included among the instructional tools is this video, complete with a smarmy music track and testimonials by parents, many of them on the verge of tears.

That many American families are struggling to make ends meet right now is undeniable. So is the grim fact that poverty levels are at a record high across the nation. But if instilling fear in young children is part of the liberal solution to this problem, count me out.

Related Articles

Follow me on Twitter or join me at Facebook. You can reach me at howard.portnoy@gmail.com or by posting a comment below.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

The correct response is, “Well, maybe if you could get your mommy and daddy to stop spending money on cigarettes, especially since Obama has made them cost even more, then maybe you wouldn’t have to worry so much about food.”

And then when the lefties freak, point them to the evidence directly linking food insecurity and smoking.

This is the perfect painting of libbies into a corner. They can’t scream about not having enough money to buy food when it’s obvious that people are blowing it on cigarettes instead, they can’t blame the high cost of tobacco because they were the ones who raised it with tax hikes, and they can’t tell poor people to stop smoking because that would be racist and classist.

northdallasthirty on December 11, 2011 at 11:59 AM

Bravo, NDal30
Obama’s fault: plain and simple.

thebrokenrattle on December 11, 2011 at 12:57 PM

Children have to be indoctrinated young. If they are taught these things now, later they can easily be convinced that bailouts, welfare and everything else on the liberal agenda is a good idea. Liberalism is a gut reaction to situations: “everyone should be required to help others”, that has to be trained as a habit.

FlareCorran on December 11, 2011 at 1:03 PM

Well when I was young it was always the responsibility of my parents to feed, clothe, and provide shelter to myself and my brothers and sisters and they did it without bowing down to government. Today I have a child of my own, and it still is my responsibility as a parent to provide food, clothing, and shelter to my child, I don’t want or need the government to that for me, it is my job as a parent and my job alone. It makes me sick that some many people are more than willing to make themselves and their children slaves of the government for the crumbs that contain strings attached to them as “benefits”. Once you start to receive these government crumbs the strings that come with them make tie you so tight that it almost impossible to escape, why would you want a life that, totally dependent on government for your survival with no hope for the future. I work two jobs to care for my family, I want the government to stay away from my family I am fine on my own thank you.

Beastdogs on December 11, 2011 at 2:01 PM

Okay, quick question, if you can’t afford food, why do you still have a TV?

Merovign on December 11, 2011 at 3:00 PM

Haven’t they already covered this already?

If you have little to eat: Develop an appetite for plates, shows, telephones, and foam letters. Eat the silverware after eating the cookies.

Punch Rockgroin on December 11, 2011 at 4:24 PM

At this point we just don’t let our children watch television anymore. Saves me the headache of worrying about this kind of thing, at least on a personal level. Some DVD’s we’ve vetted, the occasional sporting event or holiday special – that’s about it.

Quantus on December 11, 2011 at 10:07 PM

My little girls are always food insecure.

As in, they are always concerned they won’t get enough of what they want (treats). Which they don’t.

What next, Oscar runs for office as a Republican?

NoDonkey on December 12, 2011 at 9:20 AM

Quantus on December 11, 2011 at 10:07 PM

Nice to finally learn that someone else is using the same approach as my wife and myself. When our daughter was about eight, we cut off television. We still had the VCR, but no cable, no satellite, no antenna. Just an occasional film on the VCR. People we knew typically responded in semi-shock with comments such as, “Oh, my husband HAS TO HAVE his sports.”, or “Oh, I can’t do without watching [fill in the blank].” As i routinely pointed out, if you’re willing to allow the sewage on television to influence your child, you’ve already abdicated your responsibility as a parent.

As a result of the “NoTV” policy, we did more things as a family and my daughter also became an avid reader. She now – in her late 20′s – is working a job she loves and is making more money than I ever did.

You’ve made the right decision. Congratulations!

oldleprechaun on December 12, 2011 at 9:23 AM

My daughter never watched Sesame Street, and it didn’t affect her in the least. She was reading over 200 words a minute by third grade. When they get to school they are made to feel responsible for the rain forest. When my daughter came home and told me about the danger the rain forest was in, I told her, you are seven, it’s not your problem. Here’s what you need to take care of- Don’t Litter. This is the only thing I have any sympathy with the OWS people about, they had parents that fell for all this stuff and their children are now suffering for it.

Night Owl on December 12, 2011 at 10:41 AM

This is a completely typical communist tactic.

I had a teacher in high school from Cuba. He told us that when Castro took over, gov’t. bureaucrats went to the various schools to talk to the children. They’d ask the kids if they believed in God. Of course, 99% of the children said yes. They told the children to close their eyes and pray to God for some ice cream. The kids did, and the ice cream didn’t show up. Then the commies told the kids to close their eyes and ask Castro for some ice cream. While they did, the gov’t reps. would cart in some ice cream. Then they’d tell the kids there was no God, to rely on Castro instead.

Of course, no one teaches this kind of truth about communism anymore in the schools. And that’s why we’re losing the country.

avgjo on December 13, 2011 at 8:26 AM