Romney not ready for prime time

posted at 10:41 am on November 30, 2011 by
[ Elections ]   

On Monday, the New Hampshire Union Leader, the state’s largest newspaper, endorsed Newt Gingrich for the Republican nomination. On Tuesday, a Gallup poll showed Gingrich surging in positive intensity, a measure of the difference between a candidate’s favorable and unfavorable public opinion.

None of this is good news for Mitt Romney, whose own numbers plunged to a new low in the same poll. Increasingly, Romney is coming off as robotic, as someone who—to borrow the words of Joe McQuaid, the Union Leader’s publisher—is “going to say … what he thinks you want him to say.”

But, judging from his less than polished performance in an interview with FOX News Channel’s Bret Baier Tuesday night, political expediency is the least of his problems. Romney appeared uncomfortable, and a little peckish at times. Worse yet, he was ill-prepared for Baier’s questions about his shifting views on key issues—precisely the sorts of questions he will face in the presidential debates should he win the nomination.

When Baier noted early in the interview that Romney has been accused of being “on both sides of some issues,” including climate change, abortion, immigration, and gay rights, Romney bristled, replying:

Well, Bret, your list is just not accurate. So, one, we’re going to have to be better informed about my views on issues. My view is you can look at what I’ve written in my book, you can look at a person who’s devoted his life to his family, to his faith, to his country, and I’m running for president because of the things I believe I think I can do to help this country. [Editor's note: The editorial we is a nice touch.]

Putting aside the damning revelation that a line in his book was changed after the initial printing, Romney needs to articulate his positions firsthand. Unless he’s on a book tour, he should not be sending voters back to his book.

He also needs to go back and “study the film.” In an era where virtually everything is captured on video, it is suicidal for a candidate to challenge an interviewer on his record, as Romney did in this exchange:

Baier: I’m sure you’ve seen these ads using videotape of you in previous years speaking on various issues. And it seems like it’s in direct contrast to positions you take now.

Romney: Well, I’m glad the Democratic ads are breaking through—

[Crosstalk]

Baier: Well, Jon Huntsman has a couple ads that do the same thing.

Romney: —and there’s no question but that people are going to take snippets and take things out of context and try and show there are differences where in some cases there are not….

Would, for Romney’s sake, that the problem was simply a matter of context. By his own admission, his position on abortion has changed, but it is hardly the only issue on which the candidate has attempted to be all things to all people.

Although it seems as though there’s no direction to go at this point in the interview but up, things go downhill fast when the questions turn to specific issues. Romney’s position on immigration is incomprehensible, and his professed views on RomneyCare, captured in this video from the interview, are based on fiction. Baier puts the lie to Romney’s claim that he never advocated extending his health care plan to the nation later in the broadcast, when he plays a clip in which the candidate expresses support for doing precisely that.

With Barack Obama’s polling numbers in the gutter and his quiver empty, Republicans should have an easy time unseating him in 2012. The fact that they do not is less a function of Obama’s plan for the future than it is the Republicans’ lack of one. As the party fumbles to cobble together a message, the last thing it needs is a nominee who can’t get his own story straight. If Mitt Romney is to be that nominee, he had better get to work.

Related Articles

Follow me on Twitter or join me at Facebook. You can reach me at howard.portnoy@gmail.com or by posting a comment below.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Howard,
This article is idiotic! I am getting sick of our side taking quotes out of context on what Romney has said in the past from immigration to abortion to what have you! He has ALWAYS been personally against abortion but said that he would support Roe V Wade as that was the law on the books. In 2005 he made the PUBLIC change to align with his personal views and push the issue back to the States. He voted PRO-LIFE bills as a Governor. He voted PRO-2ND Amendment laws in MA that were praised by the MA NRA. He Cut taxes, he signed anti-illegal immigration laws and authorized his MA State officers to turn over to ICE any illegals they arrested BEFORE any other Governor, he entered that State with a 3BILLION dollar deficit and left with a 2BILLION Surplus…He has ALWAYS said that ALL immigrants need to return even if they are applying for citizenship…has NEVER been for Gay marriage but was against discrimination in the workplace for gays and is for civil unions…what else?

He is the ONLY Candidate with ACTUAL experience of turning things around in the economy. Gingrich’s statement about his experience during the 80′s is laughable as that does not even compare of actually meeting a payroll and earning a profit. HE IS THE ULTIMATE CAREER POLITICIAN!

I have been posting and reading HotAir since 2007 however, it is getting to be a JOKE on the dishonesty of many of its writers as they twist comments of Romney.

g2825m on November 30, 2011 at 12:10 PM

g2825m: I urge you to watch the video of the interview. If Romney comes off this weak in the face of friendly fire, how successful do you think he will be in the debates against a candidate with nothing to run on?

To repeat, if Mitt Romney is to be the GOP nominee, he had better get to work.

Howard Portnoy on November 30, 2011 at 12:29 PM

What a surprise. The princeling is getting upset that anyone would dare question his views, hold him accountable for his statements, or demand that he actually meet the standards that he’s trying to impose on other people.

He’s Mitt Romney, for heavens’ sake. Don’t you know who his daddy is? Don’t you realize how much money he has? Don’t you know how much he’s had to pay to various Republican Party mucky-mucks to get where he is today and get their endorsements? How DARE anyone hold him to the same standards that he demands of those other mere mortals who are trying to take what he’s been promised and to what he’s entitled.

northdallasthirty on November 30, 2011 at 12:41 PM

Correct on all counts. But forget about Romney “getting to work” and figuring it out. It isn’t in him. He’s politically unregenerate. I’ve been watching him for six years. He’s actually getting worse.

rrpjr on November 30, 2011 at 1:00 PM

Putting aside the damning revelation that a line in his book was changed after the initial printing, Romney needs to articulate his positions firsthand. Unless he’s on a book tour, he should not be sending voters back to his book

.

Oh please! That’s not a “damning revelation”. What he said in the hard cover was, “We can accomplish the same thing for everyone in the country.” Out of context that sentence can (and has been!) twisted to mean something it was not intended to mean (and as such, I’ll stipulate it was poorly written/edited and deserved to be pulled).

But what he said is consistent with his long held assertion that states are “laboratories of ideas”….for…other states. It is not advocating for one federally administered program. He repeatedly said and wrote that there cannot be one federal plan; that states need to design their own plans to meet their unique needs. I do agree he could do a better job of articulating his positions, (however, I don’t blame him for being tired of having to constantly restate the obvious. Ironically, if there’s one thing he has been entirely consistent on it’s this).

Baier puts the lie to Romney’s claim that he never advocated extending his health care plan to the nation later in the broadcast, when he plays a clip in which the candidate expresses support for doing precisely that.

It’s not a “lie”. Again, saying that each state could voluntarily adopt a program similar to what was legislated in Massachusetts (“a model for the nation” or a “laboratory for ideas”) is by no means the same thing as advocating a one-size-fits-all federally run central healthcare bureaucracy. Something he has never done, and specifically and repeatedly has stated should not be done…

Buy Danish on November 30, 2011 at 3:20 PM

Buy Danish: In politics, appearance is everything. You change the text of a book stating policy, and it looks like you are squirming to change your position.

As to his stance on health care, the clip Baier played later in the show was unequivocal. It showed Romney saying his program could be extended nationwide. If he was unclear, that’s another problem. Voters don’t tend to give mulligans to politicians who are not clear.

Howard Portnoy on November 30, 2011 at 3:35 PM

Howard Portnoy on November 30, 2011 at 3:35 PM

In politics, appearance is everything. You change the text of a book stating policy, and it looks like you are squirming to change your position.

Changes were made to make the book more current and reflect recent events. This is standard procedure and if it’s a “damning revelation” many authors are burning in hell or destined to go there.

Voters don’t tend to give mulligans to politicians who are not clear.

Ha! How clear was “I never had sex with that woman, Miss Lewinsky?”. How about “Hope and Change”? Or, “We are the one’s we’ve been looking for”? Clarity is hardly the determinative factor in winning elections, with or without mulligans.

That being said, Romney could do with more clarity, and he should not have gotten so testy with Baier…

Buy Danish on November 30, 2011 at 5:36 PM

“I never had sex with that woman, Miss Lewinsky?”. How about “Hope and Change”? Or, “We are the one’s we’ve been looking for”?

Point taken. I should have said “voters with at least the beginnings of a brain.”

Howard Portnoy on November 30, 2011 at 6:06 PM