Obese 8-year-old taken from family, placed in foster care

posted at 12:23 pm on November 28, 2011 by

How much is too much? It’s a question that the Ohio Department of Children and Family Services (DCFS) answered last month when the agency removed an 8-year-old child weighing 200 pounds from his home.

The action, described by the Cleveland Plain Dealer as a first for Cuyahoga County and possibly the state, loops back to the same question: How much is too much? How much government intervention on “beneficent grounds” is acceptable before a line is crossed?

County case workers would answer that question in this case by claiming the child’s mother wasn’t doing enough to control his weight. Mary Louise Madigan, a spokeswoman for DCFS, calls this an instance of medical neglect. “This child’s problem was so severe,” she is quoted as saying, “that we had to take custody.” The agency worked with the mother for more than a year before asking Juvenile Court to intervene, she adds, emphasizing the child’s risk of developing diabetes and hypertension.

But as the article reports, except for his weight problem and a sleep apnea condition that is under control, the boy is a normal elementary school student. Records indicate that he is on the honor roll and participates in school activities.

Lawyers for the mother, a substitute elementary school teacher, see the situation not in terms of overweight but of overreach. Juvenile Public Defender Sam Amata points out that children in homes where there is drug abuse or physical violence are in imminent danger, which justifies the state stepping in. But this case, he argues, is different:

[W]e would concede that some intervention is appropriate. But what risk became imminent [in the child’s health]? When did it become an immediate problem?

Members of the medical community are themselves divided on the question of whether the state should become involved in deciding whether parents of obese children are fit to raise their offspring. Arthur Caplan, a professor of bioethics and medical ethics at the University of Pennsylvania, takes a pragmatic approach. He acknowledges:

A 218-pound 8-year-old is a time bomb. But the government cannot raise these children. A third of kids are fat. We aren’t going to move them all to foster care. We can’t afford it, and I’m not sure there are enough foster parents to do it.

David Ludwig, a Harvard University professor and pediatric obesity expert, co-authored an article that appeared in the Journal of American Medical Association this summer that maintained that other interventions should be tried first and that children should be removed only as a last resort. But “last resort” is a subjective diagnosis. In his article, he cited the example of one of his own patients, a 12-year-old who weighed 400 pounds and had developed diabetes, cholesterol problems, high blood pressure, and sleep apnea—conditions that could kill her before the age of 30. But even in such extreme situations, who gets to make the call? And what is the official cut-off?

The Plain Dealer article reports 12% of third-graders, or 11,500 children, in Ohio are severely obese. How many are too many to become wards of the state?

And then there is the opposite problem, exemplified earlier this month in Madison, Wisconsin, where a couple worried that their infant daughter would become obese starved her for months. When the child was picked up by family services, she was found to have gained just 5 pounds in the 14 months after her birth—well short of the expected weight of 22 pounds.

Maybe it is time for the government to take a moratorium from its role as self-appointed arbiter of what is best for the nation’s children. The Wisconsin story additionally suggests that the First Lady’s well-intentioned, though misguided, campaign to end childhood obesity may be frightening some parents into making choices antithetical to their children’s health.

Related Articles

Follow me on Twitter or join me at Facebook. You can reach me at howard.portnoy@gmail.com or by posting a comment below.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Poor baby. One of my children is overweight. She’s nowhere near obese, but she’s overweight. I have NO idea what to do for her besides encourage more exercise and to try to minimize her intake of sweets. My other children are all within more normal weight parameters. Oh yes, and there’s obesity on one side of my family. My child looks, in fact, just like my father’s sister has looked her entire life. Might be hereditary. But still, tell that to people who look at my kid and assume I stuff her full of potato chips and soda?

If that boy weighs 200+ lbs, I’m betting there’s an endocrine problem that will NOT be addressed by yanking him away from his family and dumping him on a foster family who is, let’s be honest, quite possibly only in the system for the money. Poor baby. Poor parents. What a wretched situation.

chotii on November 28, 2011 at 12:46 PM

The mother may be so unaware about nutrition that she actually doesn’t realize her child is consuming more calories than he should be eating every day, glandular problem or not. She’s overfeeding him.

Is common sense just dead as a doornail these days?

Allahs vulva on November 28, 2011 at 1:38 PM

When the child was picked up by family services, she was found to have gained just 5 pounds in the 14 months after her birth—well short of the expected weight of 22 pounds.

It appears the parents didn’t bother to take their baby to see a pediatrician like they are suppose to do, either. I hope they are in prison.

Blake on November 28, 2011 at 2:38 PM

The government created dietary guidelines that cause obesity, and now they act shocked that people are obese. I’m sure they told the mother to give her child lots of “healthy whole grains” which do nothing but cause the blood sugar to spike, and the body to store more fat.

Vera on November 28, 2011 at 2:40 PM

Just horrible. Yes, their child shouldn’t weigh that much, yes it is a failure of the child’s parents and doctor to have allowed it to go on for so long. But he’s on the honor roll, in school activities, an average (albiet obese) kid. Maybe even better than average as most kids aren’t on the honor roll.

He never should have been removed from the household, and you can bet his next report card isn’t going to be so good being raised by people who aren’t his parents.

How can they use “potential health issues” as an excuse for immediate removal? He could go on for years, even decades without contracting diabetes or high blood pressure, and even if he did he could go on for decades more with those conditions before becoming seriously ill.

I don’t give the parents a pass, but this is an overreach beyond what anyone should accept.

DrAllecon on November 28, 2011 at 4:59 PM

So the solution is to let some strangers starve the kid in loco parentis?

Come on, Buckeye State. You can do better than this. The worst solution is to remove the kid from the home. It’s not like the kid’s name was Ayran Nation Jones or something . . .

BigAlSouth on November 28, 2011 at 5:22 PM

Turns out his siblings were sneaking food to him. Now the Child Services say they want to put him in a second foster home and provide a personal trainer. Why didn’t they just offer that to the parent in the first place instead of yanking him off school grounds and kidnapping him.

elclynn on November 28, 2011 at 7:47 PM

Police. State.

KMC1 on November 28, 2011 at 8:32 PM

Grotesque overreach. I do not live in America anymore, clearly.

I am not kidding, this is sick. When the kid doesn’t fit their chart (even after years) what will they do? keep shuffling him from family to family until he’s 18 and then cut him loose?

There is no “safe line” to draw on this kind of thing.

Yes, he’s unhealthy. I’ve seen vegan kids that look like freakin’ zombies, they won’t be taken away because that’s politically correct.

Merovign on November 30, 2011 at 1:29 AM