City of Richmond responds to Tea Party invoice—with tax audit
posted at 10:29 am on November 28, 2011 by Howard Portnoy
[ Double Standards ]
The city of Richmond is fighting fire with fire. Scratch that. It is fighting peaceful protest with fire. To fight fire with fire requires the actual setting of a conflagration, which is the M.O. of the Occupy movement.
It is the Tea Party, however, that is being singled out for this particular act of petty retaliation, which comes two weeks after the organization sent an invoice in the amount of $8,500 to Mayor Dwight Jones for costs incurred at previous rallies.
The purpose of the invoice was to draw attention to the disparate treatment of the Tea Party, which conducts peaceful demonstrations and pays its own way, and the Occupiers, which do neither: The stories of Occupier violence are legion, and the costs of their protests are being absorbed by taxpayers in cities across the country.
Presented with this stark contrast, the mayor had the option (duty?) of telling Occupy Richmond to put up or shut up—to apply for and obtain the needed permits to assemble in a public park and to pay for security, portable toilets, and other essentials.
Instead he opted for plan B. Under the guise of collecting delinquent fees from Richmond Tea Party, Inc., the city’s department of finance notified the group (which has an actual business address) that it is being subject to a comprehensive tax audit. A letter signed by Cynthia Carr, who identifies herself as “field auditor,” requests multiple pieces of documentation, including a financial statement and federal tax return for 2010. Sauce for the goose?
One explanation for this behavior unbecoming an elected official is that the mayor is an Occupy sympathizer. Another equally plausible theory is that the city of Richmond is understandably wary of incurring the wrath of a group that is prone to throwing Molotov cocktails.
Related Articles
- Hypocritical OWS protesters channel 1%: Stay at $700-a-night hotel
- Occupiers’ newest enemy: schoolchildren
- OWS violence and the mainstream media’s predicament
- Richmond Tea Party bills city; sees double standard in treatment of ‘occupiers’
- The high price of ‘Occupation’
- NYC shootings are up 28% since OWS began
- ‘How Are OWS and the Tea Party Different?’ home version
- NYC Occupy Wall Street protests turn violent AFTER eviction plan is scratched
- Occupy L.A.: We will need violence and socialism to achieve our goals
- The left and Big Labor get their ‘Tea Party’









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Double Standards X 100. Is it legal for office holders to harass groups, businesses, citizens with tax audits? I think it would be easy to prove.
IowaWoman on November 28, 2011 at 12:12 PM
The 99.99999% have to pay to clean up the mess left by the .000001%
pedestrian on November 28, 2011 at 2:06 PM
The rule of law is dead in that town. That’s appalling.
juliesa on November 28, 2011 at 2:31 PM
Oppressives With Spitefulness
Chip on November 28, 2011 at 3:34 PM
I think the city just got into a p****** contest. I hope this will not end well, for the politicians and officials involved.
LarryD on November 28, 2011 at 5:51 PM