Green Room

Climate Clown James Hansen: on the Government Dole While Accepting $1.6 Million in Additional Income… and Counting

posted at 10:10 pm on November 19, 2011 by

Like the rest of the climate crooks, Hansen appears to be on the warmal colding bandwagon for one reason and one reason alone: the Benjamins:

It seems esteemed NASA astronomer turned climatologist turned paid activist Dr. James Hansen of the Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) has not been reporting some income that he is required by law to do. How long will NASA continue to look the other way? Chris Horner explains.

A Summary of James E. Hansen’s NASA Ethics File

NASA records released to resolve litigation filed by the American Tradition Institute reveal that Dr. James E. Hansen, an astronomer, received approximately $1.6 million in outside, direct cash income in the past five years for work related to — and, according to his benefactors, often expressly for — his public service as a global warming activist within NASA.

…Hansen [also] failed to report tens of thousands of dollars in global travel provided to him by outside parties … to receive honoraria to speak about the topic of his taxpayer-funded employment, or get cash awards for his activism and even for his past testimony and other work for NASA.

Ethics laws require that such payments or gifts be reported on an SF278 public financial disclosure form. As detailed, below, Hansen nonetheless regularly refused to report this income.

Also, he seems to have inappropriately taken between $10,000 and $26,000 for speeches unlawfully promoting him as a NASA employee. This is despite NASA ordering him to return at least some of the money, with the rest apparently unnoticed by NASA. This raises troubling issues about Hansen’s, and NASA’s, compliance with ethics rules, the general prohibition on not privately benefitting from public service, and even the criminal code prohibition on not having one’s public employment income supplemented. All of this lucrative activity followed Hansen ratcheting up his global warming alarmism and activism to be more political… [but] he cannot receive outside income for doing his job, he has placed himself in peril, assuming the Department of Justice can find a way to be interested in these revelations.

…Hansen suddenly became the recipient of many, often lucrative offers of outside employment and awards after he escalated his political activism — using his NASA position as a platform, and springboard. This began with a strident “60 Minutes” interview in early 2006, alleging political interference by the Bush administration in climate science

…consider these failures to report often elegant air and hotel/resort accommodations received on his SF278 as required by law (the amount of direct cash income received from the party providing him travel, as well, is in parentheses):

• Blue Planet Prize ($500,000), travel for Hansen and his wife to Tokyo, Japan, 2010
• Dan David Prize ($500,000), travel to Paris, 2007
• Sophie Prize ($100,000), Oslo Norway, travel for Hansen and his wife, 2010
• WWF Duke of Edinburgh Award, Travel for Hansen and his wife, London, 2006
• Alpbach, Austria (alpine resort)(“business class”, with wife), 2007
• Shell Oil UK ($10,000), London, 2009
• FORO Cluster de Energia, travel for Hansen and wife (“business class”), Bilbao, Spain, 2008
• ACT Coalition, travel for Hansen and wife to London, 2007
• Progressive Forum ($10,000)(“first class”), to Houston, 2006
• Progressive Forum ($10,000), to Houston, 2009
• UCSB ($10,000), to Santa Barbara, CA
• Nierenberg Prize ($25,000), to San Diego, 2008
• Nevada Medal ($20,000), to Las Vegas, Reno, 2008
• EarthWorks Expos, to Denver, 2006
• California Academy of Science ($1,500), to San Francisco, 2009
• CalTech ($2,000), travel to Pasadena, CA for Hansen and his wife, 2007

The following is an incomplete list of other travel apparently accepted to make paid speeches and/or receive cash awards but not reported on SF278 financial disclosures:

Boston, Washington, DC (twice); Columbus, OH; Omaha, NE; Wilmington, DE; Ithaca, NY (business class); Chapel Hill, NC; Deerfield, IL (Sierra Club “No Coal” campaign); Dartmouth, NH; Alberta, Canada (as consultant to a law firm helping run an anti-oil sands campaign), Stanford; Minneapolis; Missoula, MT

…World Wildlife Fund [also] gave Hansen an engraved Montres Rolex watch, which typically run $8,000 and up (2006), but which was not reported by Hansen on his SF 278 under “gifts”, which must be reported if valued at more than $260…

These activities appear to violate the criminal code, 18 U.S.C. 209.

And Hansen’s not the only one enriching himself. Members of the United Nations Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) have profited greatly from their various reports advocating man-made global warming, carbon offsets and other money-making schemes.

Recently in the Green Room:


Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.


Trackback URL


When are these hacks going to be held accountable? I’m tired of people like Hansen flaunting the law and getting away with it. If it were you or me, we’d be in prison by now.

sadatoni on November 20, 2011 at 3:14 AM

Just when you think the level of corruption has hit a new low, the level sinks lower…..

itsspideyman on November 20, 2011 at 12:52 PM

New information here, but I’ve seen scientists argue that scientists shouldn’t be prosecuted for ClimateGate style crimes — data fabrication, data manipulation, software manipulation — that are outright fraud. The ring-leaders (at the very least) should be in prison for what they’ve done.

Now this…

Feedie on November 20, 2011 at 3:49 PM

Small potatoes compared with Al Gore’s cynical use of the issue to enrich himself.

The movement has anointed their very own “saints” to push their orthodoxy. These saints are just playing the role thrust upon them by mankind – what else could they do? And who are we to complain if they make some pittances along the way to saving the planet?

in_awe on November 20, 2011 at 4:48 PM

This is how you can know for sure that agw is a con and a hoax. Since Hansen is an astronomer how is he considered a climate scientist. I don’t think that gazing at the stars would make him an expert in that field.

Kissmygrits on November 20, 2011 at 6:18 PM

What’s the Leftist spin on this?

visions on November 20, 2011 at 6:29 PM

Hey, what is with the photo of the Rolex Explorer 1? I admit it is a classy watch, but it is merely a stainless steel version; Hanson would probably insist on a two-tone (with gold) datejust.

hugh59 on November 28, 2011 at 12:50 PM